Moderator: Community Team
huamulan wrote:Scenario:
You sleep with a woman and, because you have incredible sperm, she gets pregnant. You tell her that you have absolutely no desire for a child, are unable to offer support and that if she has it she is having it alone.
She chooses to have the baby.
Is it fair for her to blame you for not being involved in 'your' child's life? Bearing in mind that she knew from the outset that you didn't want a child.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880






























huamulan wrote:Scenario:
You sleep with a woman and, because you have incredible sperm, she gets pregnant. You tell her that you have absolutely no desire for a child, are unable to offer support and that if she has it she is having it alone.
She chooses to have the baby.
Is it fair for her to blame you for not being involved in 'your' child's life? Bearing in mind that she knew from the outset that you didn't want a child.










huamulan wrote:Scenario:
You sleep with a woman and, because you have incredible sperm, she gets pregnant. You tell her that you have absolutely no desire for a child, are unable to offer support and that if she has it she is having it alone.
She chooses to have the baby.
Is it fair for her to blame you for not being involved in 'your' child's life? Bearing in mind that she knew from the outset that you didn't want a child.


















huamulan wrote:Scenario:
You sleep with a woman and, because you have incredible sperm, she gets pregnant. You tell her that you have absolutely no desire for a child, are unable to offer support and that if she has it she is having it alone.
She chooses to have the baby.
Is it fair for her to blame you for not being involved in 'your' child's life? Bearing in mind that she knew from the outset that you didn't want a child.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"








huamulan wrote:Scenario:
You sleep with a woman and, because you have incredible sperm, she gets pregnant. You tell her that you have absolutely no desire for a child, are unable to offer support and that if she has it she is having it alone.
She chooses to have the baby.
Is it fair for her to blame you for not being involved in 'your' child's life? Bearing in mind that she knew from the outset that you didn't want a child.
























huamulan wrote:It is also perfectly legitimate to argue that he did not know before the sex that she would be crazy and want a baby with a man she is not in a relationship with. Maybe she should have informed him of her strong maternal instincts.




















huamulan wrote:It is also perfectly legitimate to argue that he did not know before the sex that she would be crazy and want a baby with a man she is not in a relationship with. Maybe she should have informed him of her strong maternal instincts.



























































Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
















huamulan wrote:It is also perfectly legitimate to argue that he did not know before the sex that she would be crazy and want a baby with a man she is not in a relationship with. Maybe she should have informed him of her strong maternal instincts.
Neoteny wrote:ITT: women are reduced to bitchy, helpless, semen receptacles.
I'm going to put on my tgd pretentious/natty holier than thou face and note that every single post in this thread is ridiculous.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"








huamulan wrote:It is also perfectly legitimate to argue that he did not know before the sex that she would be crazy and want a baby with a man she is not in a relationship with. Maybe she should have informed him of her strong maternal instincts.













Neoteny wrote:ITT: women are reduced to bitchy, helpless, semen receptacles.
I'm going to put on my tgd pretentious/natty holier than thou face and note that every single post in this thread is ridiculous.






















greenoaks wrote:if you engage in an act that's primary goal is to create offspring, and you create a child, it is your responsibility.














Bones2484 wrote:huamulan wrote:Scenario:
You sleep with a woman and, because you have incredible sperm, she gets pregnant. You tell her that you have absolutely no desire for a child, are unable to offer support and that if she has it she is having it alone.
She chooses to have the baby.
Is it fair for her to blame you for not being involved in 'your' child's life? Bearing in mind that she knew from the outset that you didn't want a child.
Your scenario states that you tell her AFTER you have sex that you do not want to get involved. So she did [u]not know from the outset that you didn't want a child as you claim.[/u]
So while you don't need to necessarily be "involved" in your child's life, you are 100% still responsible for support.

















BigBallinStalin wrote:This.
Before engaging in a voluntary exchange, it helps to know the expectations of the other party before agreeing to said exchange.
If important concerns weren't discussed earlier, then the blame lies with both parties.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"

























Users browsing this forum: No registered users