Conquer Club

Visual Inflation

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Inflation

Postby thegreekdog on Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:34 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:Image

Arguably indeed.


I'm not sure what a picture of slaves has to do with anything, but okay.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Inflation

Postby Juan_Bottom on Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:38 pm

You don't need God for morality. Firstly, several studies (I can cite the major if need be) have proven that basic morality is inherit to a person. The same way that a bird knows to fly south for the winter, the human being knows not to murder.
Second, 97%+ of American prisoners are self-identified Christians.
Third, and Philosophically, the Bible/Koran/everything teaches you to be good to avoid being hurt and going to the hurt place. So what's the difference if you behave to avoid a teacher's wraith or a God's wraith?


thegreekdog wrote:Arguably, Lincoln single handedly did more to make sure wealth would be accumulated in the hands of the few than any other president.


SLAVES!


thegreekdog wrote:I'm not sure what slaves have to do with anything, but okay.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Inflation

Postby Army of GOD on Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:44 pm

"human beings know not to murder"

oh really? like how animals know not to kill their fami..oh wait, no, some animals do kill their families. Morality is an artificial concept.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Inflation

Postby thegreekdog on Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:45 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:You don't need God for morality. Firstly, several studies (I can cite the major if need be) have proven that basic morality is inherit to a person. The same way that a bird knows to fly south for the winter, the human being knows not to murder.
Second, 97%+ of American prisoners are self-identified Christians.
Third, and Philosophically, the Bible/Koran/everything teaches you to be good to avoid being hurt and going to the hurt place. So what's the difference if you behave to avoid a teacher's wraith or a God's wraith?


thegreekdog wrote:Arguably, Lincoln single handedly did more to make sure wealth would be accumulated in the hands of the few than any other president.


SLAVES!


thegreekdog wrote:I'm not sure what slaves have to do with anything, but okay.


I would be scared of any wraiths and I'm not sure what God has to do with inflation.

Are you saying that because President Lincoln was instrumental in securing freedom for slaves that he was making sure wealth was not accumulated in the hands of the few? Seems like a stretch to me.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Inflation

Postby Juan_Bottom on Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:52 pm

No, you just said that Lincoln arguable did more to help wealth accumulate in the hands of the few. I'm saying it's quite easy to argue against your conclusions because he freed the slaves, who were, slaves. Yes, a nearly insignificant portion of them did accumulate wealth and some did buy freedom. But they did so with the blessing of their owner.
Your argument would have us ignore the freedom of the slaves who were a significant percentage of the American population. I would go after other presidents way before I'd target Lincoln for that. Martin Van Buren and George W. Bush for example.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Inflation

Postby Juan_Bottom on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:01 pm

Image


Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Inflation

Postby thegreekdog on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:03 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:No, you just said that Lincoln arguable did more to help wealth accumulate in the hands of the few. I'm saying it's quite easy to argue against your conclusions because he freed the slaves, who were, slaves. Yes, a nearly insignificant portion of them did accumulate wealth and some did buy freedom. But they did so with the blessing of their owner.
Your argument would have us ignore the freedom of the slaves who were a significant percentage of the American population. I would go after other presidents way before I'd target Lincoln for that. Martin Van Buren and George W. Bush for example.


I don't disagree (mostly because there are too many variables to determine whether one president did more to get us to where we're at now than anyone else). My point is that before Lincoln, we had a weak, decentralized federal government. After Lincoln, we had a strong, central government. President Lincoln ensured that we would have a strong central government thereby taking any number of powers away from the people. The two I'm most concerned with is the right to privacy and the ability of rich people and organizations to control elections of a small(er) group of elected officials and unelected officials. I can explain in further detail if anyone cares enough.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Inflation

Postby BigBallinStalin on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:05 pm

Argument: Lincoln did not "help wealth accumulate in the hands of the few" because he freed the slaves.


1) Did he free the slaves?

Lerone Bennett Jr., "is an African-American scholar, author and social historian, known for his revisionist analysis of race relations in the United States. His best-known works include Before the Mayflower and Forced into Glory (wiki)," says, "oh, no he didn't!"


show


http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m ... _59110854/

So, hopefully that's cleared up.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Inflation

Postby BigBallinStalin on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:07 pm

thegreekdog wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:No, you just said that Lincoln arguable did more to help wealth accumulate in the hands of the few. I'm saying it's quite easy to argue against your conclusions because he freed the slaves, who were, slaves. Yes, a nearly insignificant portion of them did accumulate wealth and some did buy freedom. But they did so with the blessing of their owner.
Your argument would have us ignore the freedom of the slaves who were a significant percentage of the American population. I would go after other presidents way before I'd target Lincoln for that. Martin Van Buren and George W. Bush for example.


I don't disagree (mostly because there are too many variables to determine whether one president did more to get us to where we're at now than anyone else). My point is that before Lincoln, we had a weak, decentralized federal government. After Lincoln, we had a strong, central government. President Lincoln ensured that we would have a strong central government thereby taking any number of powers away from the people. The two I'm most concerned with is the right to privacy and the ability of rich people and organizations to control elections of a small(er) group of elected officials and unelected officials. I can explain in further detail if anyone cares enough.


Type, my good man. Let thy thoughts flow.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Inflation

Postby Juan_Bottom on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:10 pm

Van Buren is the guy who's credited for creating Big Government. I question why McKinley doesn't get the title, but whatever.

I believe we need a strong central government. But it takes the people to hold the government accountable. Lincoln and Jefferson both said that it's up to the people to violently overthrow bad government and avenge base villainy.
Today the people don't even hold themselves accountable. That's where we fell apart. But over time, all $$$-hijacked governments fall.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Inflation

Postby Juan_Bottom on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:14 pm

Pretty much any Civil War historian will tell you that John Brown was the most responsible person for freeing the slaves.


EDIT: How could the Emancipation directly free the slaves that were in foreign and hostile territory? That's a duh situation. It was a promise that was kept.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Inflation

Postby Phatscotty on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:23 pm

thegreekdog wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:
Arguably indeed.


I'm not sure what a picture of slaves has to do with anything, but okay.


Slavery is their answer for everything
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Inflation

Postby thegreekdog on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:32 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:Image


Campaign Donations:

David Cordani (Cigna)
- 10/2/2010 - $1,000 to Jason Altmire (Democrat)
- 10/9/2010 - $2,000 to Kevin McCarthy (Republican)
- 10/2/2010 - $2,000 to Kelly Ayotte (Republican)
- 7/29/2011 - $1,000 to Thomas Carper (Democrat)
- 10/2/2010 - $1,000 to Daniel Coates (Republican)

Stephen Hemsley (UnitedHealth)
- 8/26/2010 - $500 - Francisco Canseco (Republican)
- 10/7/2010 - $10,000 - Massachusetts Republican Party (Republican)
- 10/25/2011 - $2,500 - Orrin Hatch (Republican)
- 7/9/2010 - $5,000 - United Health Group Inc. PAC (Republicans and Democrats)
- 6/7/2011 - $5,000 - United Health Group Inc. PAC (Republicans and Democrats)
- 3/23/2012 - $2,500 - Peter Roskam (Republican)
- 3/25/2011 - $5,000 - Scott Brown (Republican)

Angela Braly (WellPoint)
- 6/15/2011 and 3/14/2012 - $4,000 - The Proctor & Gamble Company Good Government Fund (Republicans and Democrats)
- 5/28/2010 - $1,000 - Kelly Ayotte (Republican)
- 3/30/2010 - $1,000 - Roy Blount (Republican)
- 6/25/2011 - $2,000 - Orrin Hatch (Republican)
- 4/13/2012 and 9/14/2010- $35,000 - National Republican Senatorial Committee (Republican)
- 5/20/2010 - $750 - Mitch McConnell (Republican)
- 9/10/2010 - $1,000 - National Republican Congressional Committe (Republican)

Allen Wise (Coventry)
- 2/15/2012 - $200 - Paul Ryan (Republican)
- 3/31/2012 - $250 - International Bank of Commerce Committee for Improvement and Betterment of the Country (Republicans and Democrats)
- 6/6/2010 - $500 - Robert K. Wasinger (Republican)
- 2/15/2012 - $250 - NRA Political Victory Fund (Republican... I assume)
- 8/31/2011 - $200 - James Inhofe (Republican)
- 9/2/2010 and 10/14/2010 - $500 - James Lankford (Republican)

Mark Bertolini (Aetna)
- 3/29/2010 - $1,000 - Robert Simmons (Republican)
- 3/3/2012 - $2,500 - Saxby Chambliss (nice name... Republican)
- 11/9/2010 - $1,500 - Kelly Ayote (Republican)
- 5/11/2011 - $2,500 - Max Baucus (Democrat)
- 11/5/2010 - $1,000 - Ronald Wyden (Democrat)
- various dates from 2010 through 2012 - upwards of $9,000 - AETNA Inc. PAC (Republicans and Democrats)
- 11/1/2010 - $1,000 - Roy Blount (Republican)
- 11/1/2010 - $2,400 - Rob Portman (Republican)
- 11/24/2010 - $1,000 - Dan Coates (Republican)
- 11/2/2010 - $500 - Charles Shumer (Democrat0
- 2/15/2012 - $2,500 - Mark Warner (Democrat)

Michael McCallister (Humana)
- 3/18/2010 and 6/21/2011 - $4,000 - Americas Health Insurance Plans PAC (Republicans and Democrats)
- 9/27/2010 - $2,400 - Kevin McCarthy (Republican)
- 8/4/2010 - $500 - Rudy Moise (Democrat)
- 6/22/2010 - $1,200 - Rob Portman (Republican)
- 7/1/2011 - $2,500 - Greg Walden (Republican)
- 9/15/2010 - $2,400 - Jason Altmire (Democrat)
- 3/31/2012 - $2,500 - Mitch McConell (Republican)
- 10/18/2011 - $1,500 - Bill Nelson (Democrat)
- 9/4/2008 - $250 - Barack Obama (?)
- 5/13/2010 - $1,400 - Trey Grayson (Republican)
- various dates - upwards of $5,000 - Humana Inc. PAC (Republicans and Democrats)
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Inflation

Postby thegreekdog on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:36 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:Van Buren is the guy who's credited for creating Big Government. I question why McKinley doesn't get the title, but whatever.

I believe we need a strong central government. But it takes the people to hold the government accountable. Lincoln and Jefferson both said that it's up to the people to violently overthrow bad government and avenge base villainy.
Today the people don't even hold themselves accountable. That's where we fell apart. But over time, all $$$-hijacked governments fall.


I would argue it's FDR followed closely by Lincoln and GW Bush (that's my argument anyway). Lincoln paved the way (honestly) for torture and the Patriot Act. Small price to pay for freeing the slaves and he was under extreme stress (so was the country), but one thinks of the Ben Franklin quote on liberty and tyranny and whatnot.

Juan_Bottom wrote:How could the Emancipation directly free the slaves that were in foreign and hostile territory?


There was a backlash against the Emancipation Proclamation freeing the slaves (given that was a proclamation against states no longer in the US and not under federal control). I naturally backlashed against the backlash (what was Lincoln supposed to do?).

Phatscotty wrote:Slavery is their answer for everything


Oh stop it.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Inflation

Postby Woodruff on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:45 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:The problem is that people in this country lack self-control and almost feel entitled to have certain things.


That is the goal of what the public education system strives for, that is what they produce and what we are trained to be, whether people want to admit it or not.


It most certainly is NOT what the public education system strives for, nor what the public education system produces. In fact, I would state that it is far more prevalant at the university level, where diplomas are created simply to make money, than it is in public education.

I'm not sure why you have this hard-on against public education, other than that you clearly don't understand it very well. What you want to blame on public education more accurately rests with the parents of the children in public education.

Phatscotty wrote:Emotions are allowed to run wild and even encouraged, and we neglect passing on anything close to actual discipline (getting suspended from school can be easily justified by the suspended as a good thing these days).


Very rarely is being suspended considered to be a good thing by those suspended. I'm not even sure what you mean about emotions being allowed and encouraged to "run wild"...perhaps you could clarify? And actual discipline certainly is not neglected, other than by the parents I mentioned previously.

Phatscotty wrote:Teachers do not have the power to punish children anymore


That's not true at all. My school's administration absolutely supports my decisions about punishing students, whether it be staying after school, suspension or whatever (as long as it's legal, of course). That doesn't mean they won't ask questions or gather information (as they should), but I have never felt unsupported at all.

Phatscotty wrote:and it's more likely that students physically attack their teachers


In my five years of teaching, I have never once seen this happen nor have I heard of it happening in the two schools I've taught in. And one of those schools had metal detectors at the doors. You're buying into the hype if you believe this is a routine occurrence.

Phatscotty wrote:And then we pulled the trifecta, tearing God out of every inch of every school, while failing to reinstall any workable system of morals in it's place.


The idea that schools fail to install any system of morals is thoroughly ignorant. In fact, I would state that most schools follow the Judeo-Christian model of morals for the most part, they simply don't outline it as being such.

Phatscotty wrote:I think the sense of entitlement can also be attributed to being born into debt like we are.


I don't think it's a sense of entitlement so much as a lack of understanding of the very real consequences.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Inflation

Postby Woodruff on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:46 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:You don't need God for morality. Firstly, several studies (I can cite the major if need be) have proven that basic morality is inherit to a person.


I think the key to morality is largely nature with some nurture (particularly involving the parents) involved. I agree God is not necessary for morality and in fact hinders it at times.
Last edited by Woodruff on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Inflation

Postby Woodruff on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:49 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:
Arguably indeed.


I'm not sure what a picture of slaves has to do with anything, but okay.


Slavery is their answer for everything


Who is "they" in this context, Phatscotty?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Inflation

Postby Timminz on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:50 pm

Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:
Arguably indeed.


I'm not sure what a picture of slaves has to do with anything, but okay.


Slavery is their answer for everything


Who is "they" in this context, Phatscotty?


He was responding to an American, so he probably meant Americans.
User avatar
Captain Timminz
 
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: At the store

Re: Inflation

Postby Woodruff on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:52 pm

Timminz wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:
Arguably indeed.


I'm not sure what a picture of slaves has to do with anything, but okay.


Slavery is their answer for everything


Who is "they" in this context, Phatscotty?


He was responding to an American, so he probably meant Americans.


He (as an American) does seem to be the one that talks about racism the most, so that could be right.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Inflation

Postby thegreekdog on Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:23 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:No, you just said that Lincoln arguable did more to help wealth accumulate in the hands of the few. I'm saying it's quite easy to argue against your conclusions because he freed the slaves, who were, slaves. Yes, a nearly insignificant portion of them did accumulate wealth and some did buy freedom. But they did so with the blessing of their owner.
Your argument would have us ignore the freedom of the slaves who were a significant percentage of the American population. I would go after other presidents way before I'd target Lincoln for that. Martin Van Buren and George W. Bush for example.


I don't disagree (mostly because there are too many variables to determine whether one president did more to get us to where we're at now than anyone else). My point is that before Lincoln, we had a weak, decentralized federal government. After Lincoln, we had a strong, central government. President Lincoln ensured that we would have a strong central government thereby taking any number of powers away from the people. The two I'm most concerned with is the right to privacy and the ability of rich people and organizations to control elections of a small(er) group of elected officials and unelected officials. I can explain in further detail if anyone cares enough.


Type, my good man. Let thy thoughts flow.


Do work or respond to BBS? No contest...

(1) Privacy. Prior to Abraham Lincoln, there were local and state situated militias. Alone, these were not enough to fight the federal government to the extent the federal government wished to exert its will (see, e.g. The American Civil War), they did protect some modicum of privacy. This was also a holdover from the 18th and early 19th century when everyone had a gun (yeah, I typed it). In any event, it was less likely that the federal government would come down and break into your house. Fast fowrad to today where the federal government is a monolith that can do pretty much whatever it wants without any repurcussions, much less outright rebellion that Juan talks about. The only check on the executive and legislative branches is the Supreme Court and they seem to be rubber stamping any sorts of violations of rights to privacy. I blame Lincoln.

(2) Small number of people in power in a central government = easier to corrupt. We have some hundreds of Congress people, one president, and a host of regulatory workers that work in one place for one government. Rich people, companies, and interested parties can find it much easier to monetarily control these people rather than having to control, say, thousands of members of Congress or legislatures across the states. Who took the most power away from the states and consolidated a lot of that power to the federal government? Abe.

Caveat - I still consider him the greatest president in history.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Inflation

Postby Juan_Bottom on Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:19 am

thegreekdog wrote: Fast forward to today where the federal government is a monolith that can do pretty much whatever it wants without any repurcussions, much less outright rebellion that Juan talks about.

We. We are talking about...



Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Inflation

Postby Lootifer on Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:23 pm

Ironically Australia has just announced a new 20k grant to new home buyers...

I mean its not nearly as bad as subprime mortgages and other bubbles... BUT COME ON! WHAT DID WE LEARN ABOUT HOUSING?!?!!?!
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: Inflation

Postby BigBallinStalin on Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:39 pm

Lootifer wrote:Ironically Australia has just announced a new 20k grant to new home buyers...

I mean its not nearly as bad as subprime mortgages and other bubbles... BUT COME ON! WHAT DID WE LEARN ABOUT HOUSING?!?!!?!


That subsidizing housing can be politically profitable in the short-run,* and that if things go sour, blame the market?

That worked very well in the US for nearly all politicians.



*and probably also in the long-run, if (A) the "informed" public can be easily misled, (B) the voting public is misinformed, (C) the voting public has a short memory and short attention span, etc.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Inflation

Postby huamulan on Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:45 pm

Once you realize that humans are predisposed to short-term thinking then all of this will be less of a puzzle to you.

It's basic psychology that most people will take 1 sweet now rather than 3 tomorrow.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class huamulan
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 7:53 am

Re: Inflation

Postby Juan_Bottom on Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:28 pm

huamulan wrote:Once you realize that humans are predisposed to short-term thinking then all of this will be less of a puzzle to you.

It's basic psychology that most people will take 1 sweet now rather than 3 tomorrow.



Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users