Conquer Club

New Evidence regarding Obama

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby BigBallinStalin on Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:32 am

Image


The connection cannot be disputed.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby BigBallinStalin on Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:34 am

Furthermore,










































Image
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Ray Rider on Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:57 am

That's definitely some conclusive evidence there! No way he can argue that! lol
Image
Image
Highest score: 2221
User avatar
Major Ray Rider
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: In front of my computer, duh!

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Baron Von PWN on Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:33 pm

this is totes a trap thread.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Baron Von PWN
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: Capital region ,Canada

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby rdsrds2120 on Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:38 pm

Baron Von PWN wrote:this is totes a trap thread.


I don't think it's sprung yet.

*sits back with salty/sweet snack and waits*

-rd
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby The Voice on Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:55 pm

Kittens!!!!!!

EDIT: Dammit, I'm trapped.
Major The Voice
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: Location, Location!

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby BigBallinStalin on Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:03 pm

Baron Von PWN wrote:this is totes a trap thread.


Sorry to disappoint you, BVP, but there are no traps ITT.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby rdsrds2120 on Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:45 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Baron Von PWN wrote:this is totes a trap thread.


Sorry to disappoint you, BVP, but there are no traps ITT.


But how do we know that there are no traps at the Institute of Travel and Tourism?

-rd
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Army of GOD on Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:48 pm

OP is racist. Not all black people look alike.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby BigBallinStalin on Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:49 pm

rdsrds2120 wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Baron Von PWN wrote:this is totes a trap thread.


Sorry to disappoint you, BVP, but there are no traps ITT.


But how do we know that there are no traps at the Institute of Travel and Tourism?

-rd


it's just one of those things that you have to see for yourself...
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby huamulan on Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:49 am

Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class huamulan
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 7:53 am

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Army of GOD on Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:07 pm

seems legit
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Phatscotty on Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:15 pm

Obama's birthplace aside, it is a fact he did not grow up in mainland America and literally grew up in a foreign country for 80% of his time under 18 years old, and Obama did not step a foot into the lower 48 until he was 18 years old.

That's where his unAmericanism comes from. Growing up in America is an invaluable and irreplaceable part of understanding what it means to be an American.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Lootifer on Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:34 pm

Phatscotty wrote:Obama's birthplace aside, it is a fact he did not grow up in mainland America and literally grew up in a foreign country for 80% of his time under 18 years old, and Obama did not step a foot into the lower 48 until he was 18 years old.

That's where his unAmericanism comes from. Growing up in America is an invaluable and irreplaceable part of understanding what it means to be an American.

Quoting for WTF
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby saxitoxin on Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:14 am

Phatscotty wrote:Obama did not step a foot into the lower 48 until he was 18 years old. That's where his unAmericanism comes from. Growing up in America is an invaluable and irreplaceable part of understanding what it means to be an American.


Scott just single-handed expelled Hawai'i from the United States.

Image
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13413
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Army of GOD on Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:27 am

Hawaii is further south than any other state. How are the "other" 48 "lower"?
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:57 am

Army of GOD wrote:Hawaii is further south than any other state. How are the "other" 48 "lower"?


The lower 48

The term lower 48 may or may not include the District of Columbia (which is not part of any of the 48 states).

The contiguous United States are the 48 U.S. states on the continent of North America that are south of Canada and north of Mexico, plus the District of Columbia.[1] The term excludes the states of Alaska and Hawaii, and all off-shore U.S. territories and possessions, such as Puerto Rico.[2][3][4]


Fun fact
Non-contiguous areas within the contiguous United States

Some parts of the contiguous United States are accessible by road only by travelling on Canadian soil. Point Roberts, Washington; Elm Point, Minnesota, and the Northwest Angle in Minnesota are three such places
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Lootifer on Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:13 pm

Still fails to make your initial point not batshit insane.

DOUBLE NEGATIVE FTW
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby spurgistan on Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:45 am

That birth certificate misspelled the racial epithet popularized by George Jefferson, "Honky." I think it mighta been faked.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.


Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Sergeant spurgistan
 
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Army of GOD on Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:48 am

I thought honkies referred to cars and Skeeter from Doug.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby huamulan on Fri Jun 15, 2012 5:53 am

It's funny because everyone says Obama is a black president when what they really mean is 'pale brown president'.

He's barely more than a white man with a tan.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class huamulan
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 7:53 am

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Phatscotty on Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:52 pm

There is new evidence Obama literally and physically signed up to join a Socialist party in 1996-97.

Image

Image
Obama deadbeated his dues to the New Socialist Party in 1997.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... -New-Party

New Party principles
* Full public financing of elections, universal voter registration, proportional representation, free party competition.
* The establishment, defense, and facilitation of worker, consumer, shareholder, and taxpayer rights to democratic self-organization.
* The creation of a sustainable economy based on the responsible and reverent use of our earth's resources-taking no more than we need, replacing and reusing all that we can.
* A society in which we all take seriously our responsibilities as parents, workers and citizens.
* The democratization of our banking and financial system-including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets, community-controlled alternative financial institutions.
* A Bill of Rights for America's Children, guaranteeing true equality of opportunity, providing equal education for all students, and achieving an adequate standard of health care, nutrition, housing, and safety.
* Community-control and equitable funding of our schools, within which we seek true excellence in public education along with equal opportunity to achieve it.
* Full employment, a shorter work week, and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal "social wage" to include such basic benefits as health care, child care, vacation time, and lifelong access to education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth and like programs to ensure gender equity.
* A progressive tax system based on the ability to pay.
Rebuilding our cities and metropolitan regions-the cornerstones of a high-wage and ecologically sustainable economy-through community-led programs of comprehensive, democratic, high-wage, and low-waste economic development.
* A community in which residents, neighborhood organizations, businesses, police and local officials work cooperatively as equal partners to provide a safe and secure environment in which to live and work and study.
* A reduction of national military spending to that necessary to the defense of the United States and an end to unilateral military interventions.
* Trade among nations consistent with mutual improvement in living standards, reduced cross-national inequalities, and sustainable development.
* In all aspects of our economy and social life, an absolute bar to discrimination based on race, gender, age, country of origin, and sexual orientation, and absolute security in reproductive rights, fundamental liberties, and privacy.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby maasman on Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:59 pm

I honestly see nothing wrong with those principles. Now if they're actually possible can be debated, but they are nice goals.
Image
User avatar
Major maasman
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:45 pm
Location: Goose Creek, USA

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby BigBallinStalin on Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:04 pm

I'd ask PS to stop derailing the thread, but in retrospect his posts fit the surious theme of the OP.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: New Evidence regarding Obama

Postby Phatscotty on Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:08 pm

maasman wrote:I honestly see nothing wrong with those principles. Now if they're actually possible can be debated, but they are nice goals.


How do you think they would impact liberty?
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Next

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users