Moderator: Community Team






















QoH wrote:Credit to Patches - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=175466
Tis the election season in the US. So it's time to exercise that American pastime, mocking and making fun of the incumbent challenger. This thread is dedicated to calling out Obama Romney on his BS, gaffs, ineptitude and his gigantic normal ears.
No matter what side of the isle one may fall on the false dichotomy of the left/right paradigm, I think we can all agree that it's quite appropriate to make fun of our Dear Leaders, whomever they may be.
No doubt, the Obamaphiles Romneyphiles will sputter and be indignant but that's half the fun.
Political satire is a staple of freedom of expression. So, without violating the obscenity rules of the site, without further ado, Obamamentz Romneymentz!
The Best Romney Memes Around!





patches70 wrote:










Woodruff wrote:I can't imagine there's nearly the material for this thread, though.
























Colemanus wrote:Somebody who dislikes a candidate for dodging the draft 45 years ago is stupid. The Candidate will be giving orders to the military and they will follow those orders.










Woodruff wrote:Colemanus wrote:Somebody who dislikes a candidate for dodging the draft 45 years ago is stupid. The Candidate will be giving orders to the military and they will follow those orders.
I think that if someone wants to be the Commander In Chief, the idea of whether they dodged the draft or not is quite relevant.
I would agree that some leniency could be made for a great length of time passing (as attitudes change), but I think it's still relevant to be part of the discussion.






















Timminz wrote:Well, you managed to make one post without the indignant sputtering. I applaud you for your self-control.




patches70 wrote:Woodruff wrote:Colemanus wrote:Somebody who dislikes a candidate for dodging the draft 45 years ago is stupid. The Candidate will be giving orders to the military and they will follow those orders.
I think that if someone wants to be the Commander In Chief, the idea of whether they dodged the draft or not is quite relevant.
I would agree that some leniency could be made for a great length of time passing (as attitudes change), but I think it's still relevant to be part of the discussion.
Was it relevant in Bill Clinton's case?
Was it relevant in Dick Cheney's case?
patches70 wrote:Just asking is all, let the Romney bashing continue unabated.










patches70 wrote:Timminz wrote:Well, you managed to make one post without the indignant sputtering. I applaud you for your self-control.
Still butt sore or sumptin? Don't worry, the pain passes eventually.










Woodruff wrote:Absolutely, for me it was, in both cases. Though not nearly as strongly as using illegal means for doing so. I'm curious as to why you think I would be inconsistent in that view?
Woodruff wrote:Where was I bashing Romney in any way? Are you going Phatscotty on us?



GBU56 wrote:I nominate patches70 as the new policeman for this forum. He'll restore order here, regardless how many posters he needs to ban!








































Timminz wrote:Slightly off-topic: I am curious what patchy thinks I might be butt-hurt over. Is he confusing me with someone else, or did he recently school me on something without me noticing?



















Users browsing this forum: No registered users