Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:edit
You don't have any understanding of what this thread is about, do you?
hehe, wrong thread. I try to stay out of you guys's
Sorry
Moderator: Community Team
Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:edit
You don't have any understanding of what this thread is about, do you?
Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:They are trying to force it on us, force it in our schools, force it in the workplace, in our church. All of a sudden we have to change everything into our new hijacked defintions. Anyone who disagrees with the new highjacked definitions must be put out of business, and the schools must be flipped upside down.
That's why it's Nazi tactics. Look at the absurdity of calling someone who thinks marriage is between a man and a woman is now a bigot. It's totally absurd! That's all marriage has ever been!
You don't have any understanding of what this thread is about, do you?
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:edit
You don't have any understanding of what this thread is about, do you?
hehe, wrong thread. I try to stay out of you guys's
Sorry
Evil Semp wrote:Upgrayedd wrote:"Rights issues", by which you probably mean institutionalized discrimination, can affect the population in a significant way, therefore your reasoning is flawed.
Isn't that what this thread is about? Institutionalized discrimination.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
yang guize wrote:do you think that all religious schools should be refused government money? or just religious schools like this that is not accepting of gay families?
it sounds like you are just complaining because you think gays and straight people are equal. therefore you will not let anyone believe differently. unfortunately for you, it is not your position to force your value system on every other citizen of your country.
your choice is either:
- official recognition of and support for all religious values, whether or not you personally agree with them.
- no official recognition of or support for any religious values.
essentially, if you ask your government to fun some people but not others then you are asking your government to regulate morality.
Upgrayedd wrote: Homosexual example: no you shouldn't care about what other people have the "right" to do. You are not them, therefore you cannot speak for them. If they a problem dealing with discrimination, it's up to them to solve it. Game over, insert coin to continue.
GreecePwns wrote:Exactly. Which is why government funding should not go to private schools. This money can be used to fund a myriad of other things that don't involve imposing morality on citizens.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Upgrayedd wrote: Homosexual example: no you shouldn't care about what other people have the "right" to do. You are not them, therefore you cannot speak for them. If they a problem dealing with discrimination, it's up to them to solve it. Game over, insert coin to continue.
Yeah, pretty much what a lot of people said in 1925 Germany.....
yang guize wrote:do you think that all religious schools should be refused government money? or just religious schools like this that is not accepting of gay families?
it sounds like you are just complaining because you think gays and straight people are equal. therefore you will not let anyone believe differently. unfortunately for you, it is not your position to force your value system on every other citizen of your country.
your choice is either:
- official recognition of and support for all religious values, whether or not you personally agree with them.
- no official recognition of or support for any religious values.
essentially, if you ask your government to fun some people but not others then you are asking your government to regulate morality.
Upgrayedd wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Upgrayedd wrote: Homosexual example: no you shouldn't care about what other people have the "right" to do. You are not them, therefore you cannot speak for them. If they a problem dealing with discrimination, it's up to them to solve it. Game over, insert coin to continue.
Yeah, pretty much what a lot of people said in 1925 Germany.....
The Weimar Republic was discriminating! THE HORROR![]()
FYI Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems (much less homosexual discrimination). Your post is completely nonsensical.
Upgrayedd wrote:Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems
yang guize wrote:LOL.Upgrayedd wrote:Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems
from what i have heard, there was a european holocaust that was run by the germans during world war 2 (so it was going on during 1943).
it was so serious that in europe they still arrest and punish people who were involved in killing jews at this time. it sounds to me that discrimination caused some fairly big problems during the nazi's leadership.
Yeah, I picked 1925 for a reason. See, waiting until an oppressive regime is already in power is pretty much too late to fight oppression.Upgrayedd wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Upgrayedd wrote: Homosexual example: no you shouldn't care about what other people have the "right" to do. You are not them, therefore you cannot speak for them. If they a problem dealing with discrimination, it's up to them to solve it. Game over, insert coin to continue.
Yeah, pretty much what a lot of people said in 1925 Germany.....
The Weimar Republic was discriminating! THE HORROR![]()
FYI Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems (much less homosexual discrimination). Your post is completely nonsensical.
Upgrayedd wrote:yang guize wrote:LOL.Upgrayedd wrote:Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems
from what i have heard, there was a european holocaust that was run by the germans during world war 2 (so it was going on during 1943).
it was so serious that in europe they still arrest and punish people who were involved in killing jews at this time. it sounds to me that discrimination caused some fairly big problems during the nazi's leadership.
1. You need to learn what discrimination means
2. You need to learn what holocaust means
3. You need to learn what context means
P.S. You should also look into the fact that not only Jews died during WW2
Frigidus wrote:
Oh man, she got the date wrong. You totally countered her point there. Well played.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Yeah, I picked 1925 for a reason. See, waiting until an oppressive regime is already in power is pretty much too late to fight oppression.Upgrayedd wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Upgrayedd wrote: Homosexual example: no you shouldn't care about what other people have the "right" to do. You are not them, therefore you cannot speak for them. If they a problem dealing with discrimination, it's up to them to solve it. Game over, insert coin to continue.
Yeah, pretty much what a lot of people said in 1925 Germany.....
The Weimar Republic was discriminating! THE HORROR![]()
FYI Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems (much less homosexual discrimination). Your post is completely nonsensical.
But if you have trouble understanding what I wrote, then you should try some basic English classes (not mention a few history classes).
Then again, answers like this are likely humerous to most people here...Upgrayedd wrote:yang guize wrote:LOL.Upgrayedd wrote:Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems
from what i have heard, there was a european holocaust that was run by the germans during world war 2 (so it was going on during 1943).
it was so serious that in europe they still arrest and punish people who were involved in killing jews at this time. it sounds to me that discrimination caused some fairly big problems during the nazi's leadership.
1. You need to learn what discrimination means
2. You need to learn what holocaust means
3. You need to learn what context means
P.S. You should also look into the fact that not only Jews died during WW2
LOL... LOL... LOL
For fun, how about you provide us with your "definitions" ..... It should prove interesting...
Woodruff wrote:This school should not receive any Federal tax money. As an aside, I also don't understand why they would reject this, given they "could save the kid"...shouldn't they be thinking that way?
http://www.koat.com/news/new-mexico/albuquerque/School-rejects-3-year-old-because-parents-are-gay/-/9153728/15665304/-/aadto3/-/index.html
Upgrayedd wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Yeah, I picked 1925 for a reason. See, waiting until an oppressive regime is already in power is pretty much too late to fight oppression.Upgrayedd wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Upgrayedd wrote: Homosexual example: no you shouldn't care about what other people have the "right" to do. You are not them, therefore you cannot speak for them. If they a problem dealing with discrimination, it's up to them to solve it. Game over, insert coin to continue.
Yeah, pretty much what a lot of people said in 1925 Germany.....
The Weimar Republic was discriminating! THE HORROR![]()
FYI Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems (much less homosexual discrimination). Your post is completely nonsensical.
But if you have trouble understanding what I wrote, then you should try some basic English classes (not mention a few history classes).
Then again, answers like this are likely humerous to most people here...Upgrayedd wrote:yang guize wrote:LOL.Upgrayedd wrote:Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems
from what i have heard, there was a european holocaust that was run by the germans during world war 2 (so it was going on during 1943).
it was so serious that in europe they still arrest and punish people who were involved in killing jews at this time. it sounds to me that discrimination caused some fairly big problems during the nazi's leadership.
1. You need to learn what discrimination means
2. You need to learn what holocaust means
3. You need to learn what context means
P.S. You should also look into the fact that not only Jews died during WW2
LOL... LOL... LOL
For fun, how about you provide us with your "definitions" ..... It should prove interesting...
FYI Nazi party had popular support and few people even tried fighting it's oppression. If the majority of Germans really wanted to they'd have had no problem kicking the Nazi's out. FAIL.
PLAYER57832 wrote:They do accept children who are not Roman Catholic, though we have to pay more money.
jimboston wrote:
Question... why would anyone want to go to a private school that doesn't want them or accept their lifestyle?
PLAYER57832 wrote:Upgrayedd wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Yeah, I picked 1925 for a reason. See, waiting until an oppressive regime is already in power is pretty much too late to fight oppression.Upgrayedd wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Upgrayedd wrote: Homosexual example: no you shouldn't care about what other people have the "right" to do. You are not them, therefore you cannot speak for them. If they a problem dealing with discrimination, it's up to them to solve it. Game over, insert coin to continue.
Yeah, pretty much what a lot of people said in 1925 Germany.....
The Weimar Republic was discriminating! THE HORROR![]()
FYI Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems (much less homosexual discrimination). Your post is completely nonsensical.
But if you have trouble understanding what I wrote, then you should try some basic English classes (not mention a few history classes).
Then again, answers like this are likely humerous to most people here...Upgrayedd wrote:yang guize wrote:LOL.Upgrayedd wrote:Nazis didn't come to power until 1933 and by 1943 discrimination was the LEAST of Germany's problems
from what i have heard, there was a european holocaust that was run by the germans during world war 2 (so it was going on during 1943).
it was so serious that in europe they still arrest and punish people who were involved in killing jews at this time. it sounds to me that discrimination caused some fairly big problems during the nazi's leadership.
1. You need to learn what discrimination means
2. You need to learn what holocaust means
3. You need to learn what context means
P.S. You should also look into the fact that not only Jews died during WW2
LOL... LOL... LOL
For fun, how about you provide us with your "definitions" ..... It should prove interesting...
FYI Nazi party had popular support and few people even tried fighting it's oppression. If the majority of Germans really wanted to they'd have had no problem kicking the Nazi's out. FAIL.
and you feel this disputes what I said, how, exactly?
See my point is that we don't want to copy pre WWII Germany... We DO fight oppression, here, which is why the objections to tax dollars being used to promote one religious viewpoint.
jimboston wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:They do accept children who are not Roman Catholic, though we have to pay more money.
This is a misleading statement.
You don't pay more because you're not Roman Catholic.
You pay more because you are not a member of the parish.
Roman Catholic's who belong to another parish would also pay more than a local parishioner.
Note... the discount to parishioner's is a reflection of the fact that they make donations to the church weekly.
(or at least they are supposed to... and many parishes track how much based on the envelope which people use.)
(Technically a catholic is supposed to donate 10% of his/her income to his/her parish... though around here very few actually do that much.)
Upgrayedd wrote:
So because one ultra-oppressive state failed that means all forms of oppression, no matter how minor, will also fail. Wut. What about Rome, Ancient China, pre-modern USA - they were all oppressive and yet they did extremely well for themselves, affording their citizens higher standards of living than was the norm for their times and leaving behind legacies that would persist for thousands of years.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:GreecePwns wrote:Exactly. Which is why government funding should not go to private schools. This money can be used to fund a myriad of other things that don't involve imposing morality on citizens.
+1
If you want to indoctrinate your kids you can do it on your own dime.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users