Symmetry wrote:chapcrap wrote:For the record, it's Chick, not Chic. Those words mean different things.
Also for the record, they make amazing chicken and it tastes great.
Is this one of those "Mussolini made the trains run on time" kind of apologetics? Cause surely nice tasting fast food doesn't excuse donating to organisations that are partly responsible for executions of homosexuals in Uganda, if Juan's sources are correct.
This is one of those "The chicken is awesome, I don't care what CEOs say, everything I have experienced from the company is positive, and I love food a lot" kind of apologetics.
And about Uganda:

EDIT: I mean, you can't take Juan sources from what he says. He can't even spell the company name right. So, he obviously doesn't graze his material very meticulously. If you're going to argue against something, like Chick-Fil-A, then come across competent, informed, and have something ready for what people are going to respond back to you. Otherwise, why bother?