jak111 wrote:Campin_Killer wrote:
Count is being replaced, just saying
>:O You would take a good case away from me
what did you have on him Jak,it might do for his replacement to be able to explain some things.
Moderator: Community Team
jak111 wrote:Campin_Killer wrote:
Count is being replaced, just saying
>:O You would take a good case away from me
jgordon1111 wrote:jak111 wrote:Campin_Killer wrote:
Count is being replaced, just saying
>:O You would take a good case away from me
what did you have on him Jak,it might do for his replacement to be able to explain some things.
jgordon1111 wrote:jak111 wrote:Campin_Killer wrote:
Count is being replaced, just saying
>:O You would take a good case away from me
what did you have on him Jak,it might do for his replacement to be able to explain some things.
Iron Butterfly wrote:jgordon1111 wrote:jak111 wrote:Campin_Killer wrote:
Count is being replaced, just saying
>:O You would take a good case away from me
what did you have on him Jak,it might do for his replacement to be able to explain some things.
His inactivity.
vodean wrote:well i guess my vote came after deadline...
vodean wrote:well im pretty sure i voted NoS earlier. i unvoted him because i thought that some of the other cases seemed more promising, but then i changed my vote back so that we would at least get a lynch. and look how it turned out! i hardly think that scum would hammer their scum-buddy when they could just wait 10 minutes.
jak111 wrote:vodean wrote:well im pretty sure i voted NoS earlier. i unvoted him because i thought that some of the other cases seemed more promising, but then i changed my vote back so that we would at least get a lynch. and look how it turned out! i hardly think that scum would hammer their scum-buddy when they could just wait 10 minutes.
Which brings me to the main point about the post that you skipped. You brought your vote back in hoping the deadline already passed.
Iron Butterfly wrote:There are to many people not playing.
I would be curious as to what jgordons investigation revealed. he stated he was a forensics investigator. I would assume he tried to investigate jonty.
jgordon1111 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:There are to many people not playing.
I would be curious as to what jgordons investigation revealed. he stated he was a forensics investigator. I would assume he tried to investigate jonty.
You are correct IB, I did investigate jonty and despite what my role says, I got no results, I have asked CK about it,and he said no results which to me would indicate I got blocked. otherwise my thought are whoever killed jonty is the only mafia left and has a joat type role.
Iron Butterfly wrote:I played on the side of caution.
Iron Butterfly wrote:jgordon1111 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:There are to many people not playing.
I would be curious as to what jgordons investigation revealed. he stated he was a forensics investigator. I would assume he tried to investigate jonty.
You are correct IB, I did investigate jonty and despite what my role says, I got no results, I have asked CK about it,and he said no results which to me would indicate I got blocked. otherwise my thought are whoever killed jonty is the only mafia left and has a joat type role.
Why do you believe he is the only mafia left and has a joat type role?
jak111 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:I played on the side of caution.
Sometimes it's the caution that get us killed. If we're too afraid to lynch the fake claiming docs, cops, JOAT's, etc. Then we're never going to see through mafia fake claims. You play on caution, I play on everybody is fair game until we start getting confirmations.
jgordon1111 wrote:speculation IB,its a small game 3 mafia would be kind of overdoing it most likely, and per the last scene,somebody got grabbed,mafia tried to make a kill but it didnt work out,and I got a no result on what should have been a sure thing,which means I got blocked.
So I am figuring 2 things cult,joat or game slight imbalance with 3 mafia. anyone else with anything.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users