Moderator: Community Team
Epitaph1 wrote:It looks like Dexter is a bad guy this game and there is another killer out there.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Epitaph1 wrote:It looks like Dexter is a bad guy this game and there is another killer out there.
Why don't you try to explain this? Dexter is a killer, and may well have WC contrary to some townies, but his goal is most likely the same as the towns, end threats (SKs)
BGtheBrain wrote:Weak play saf.
I must've just made up the part about my role pm being messed up.
You're a better player than that FOS safari guy
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
chapcrap wrote:Yesterday, I preferred a lynch of BG over jonty. However, today that seems like something that's pretty weak and silly. Just jumping to the conclusion of a non-VT game after 3 deaths? I'm sorry, but I just can't buy that. If you have something on BG, then it would be different, but going for a lynch simply based on assumptions that there isn't a VT in the game is preposterous at this point.
So, the line of actions go:
- saf votes BG with ridiculous reasoning
- thechuck follows immediately for no real reason other "to follow saf's lead"
- LSU votes for the same weak reasoning saf showed
I don't know which of you is the scummiest, but this is all very scummy, IMO. And clearly, I'm not just on BG's side. I put him at L-1 yesterday.
BGtheBrain wrote:So basically, we're basically treating D2 like an extension of D1 while adding nothing to the game?
Not one person voting me has discussed the logic behind me fakecounterclaiming for no reason on a SK....
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users