Here's the scenario:
In the future, the price of an abortion would be the same as the Eviction Procedure, which includes evicting the fetus and rehabilitating it to a fully developed newborn.
- For the sake of argument, and to skip past all these objections about unknown future costs and benefits to society,* assume that the distribution of newborns is perfect. In other words, let's assume that all the evicted newborns are shipped to loving families in the peace-loving and wealthy land of Newbornistan, where they experience a totes awesome life. Therefore, there are no costs to society in which the eviction occurs, and the family who evicted that fetus experiences the somewhat similar costs of "losing" a child.
- What is evicting a fetus? The fetus is like an unwanted tenant, who is evicted from one's property. In other words, the fetus is removed in any trimester but is "rehabilitated" into a fully developed new born.
Now then,
Since the prices of an abortion and of an eviction are the same, then is aborting the fetus justified?