Moderator: Community Team
fadedpsychosis wrote:so... my sum up of the past few pages (slightly out of order, but I'm trying to follow the thought flow):
Woodruff: I don't believe because I see no evidence
john9blue: what about all this evidence? where's your evidence?
Wood: absence of evidence is evidence of absence, and I don't believe your evidence so it doesn't count to me
john: whatchoo talkin bout woodruff? unthinking unbelief is just like unthinking belief
Funkyterrance: I agree!
PLAYER57832: me too!
wood: you're stupid!
(FT and wood go back and forth about accountability)
FT: can you stop calling people stupid?
wood: then quit being stupid!
FT: now you're derailing! (changes subject to motive)
chang50:(simplistic answer) now back to what we were arguing about!
FT: (goes back to motive argument, dragging chang and oss spy with him)
chang: you say you're neutral but you're not neutral!
FT: objection! irrelevant!
(more arguing, topic shifts slightly to meaningfulness, blame thown at FT)
FT: don't blame me for the subject I brought up, blame the subject! I'm innocent I tell you!
Wood: wait, WTF? you're blaming ME for derailing??
(more words from wood at FT)
(back and forth between oss and FT)
BBS: trollolololol!
Wood: (to john) you don't know what agnosticism means!
fadedpsychosis: you keep using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means.
Funkyterrance wrote:Woodruff wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Woodruff wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Lovely, now you're going to act like a petulant child?? This is helping your stance in your opinion?
Perhaps instead of saying stupid things, you'd discuss the issue that was being discussed before you started saying stupid things.
I would be happy to keep to issues being discussed if you wouldn't constantly interrupt them with "you're stupid" whenever you are at a loss of words. Deal?
At any rate I am starting to see a pattern of you derailing the convo. when your argument starts to falter. Its the equivalent of taking a "time out".
You're blaming ME for derailing the thread, when it's YOU who did it? Brilliant. Dishonest, which isn't surprising...but brilliant.
I honestly believe you derail the thread whenever you resort to name calling. It's disruptive to the flow of a conversation and has no weight whatsoever, therefore pure interruption.
Dishonest? Wtf?
Woodruff wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Woodruff wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Woodruff wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Lovely, now you're going to act like a petulant child?? This is helping your stance in your opinion?
Perhaps instead of saying stupid things, you'd discuss the issue that was being discussed before you started saying stupid things.
I would be happy to keep to issues being discussed if you wouldn't constantly interrupt them with "you're stupid" whenever you are at a loss of words. Deal?
At any rate I am starting to see a pattern of you derailing the convo. when your argument starts to falter. Its the equivalent of taking a "time out".
You're blaming ME for derailing the thread, when it's YOU who did it? Brilliant. Dishonest, which isn't surprising...but brilliant.
I honestly believe you derail the thread whenever you resort to name calling. It's disruptive to the flow of a conversation and has no weight whatsoever, therefore pure interruption.
Dishonest? Wtf?
I was on topic. You were not. You derailed.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Woodruff wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Woodruff wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Woodruff wrote:
Perhaps instead of saying stupid things, you'd discuss the issue that was being discussed before you started saying stupid things.
I would be happy to keep to issues being discussed if you wouldn't constantly interrupt them with "you're stupid" whenever you are at a loss of words. Deal?
At any rate I am starting to see a pattern of you derailing the convo. when your argument starts to falter. Its the equivalent of taking a "time out".
You're blaming ME for derailing the thread, when it's YOU who did it? Brilliant. Dishonest, which isn't surprising...but brilliant.
I honestly believe you derail the thread whenever you resort to name calling. It's disruptive to the flow of a conversation and has no weight whatsoever, therefore pure interruption.
Dishonest? Wtf?
I was on topic. You were not. You derailed.
Calling him stupid and a petulant child really kept the conversation on track, Woodruff!
thegreekdog wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:oss spy wrote:What a retarded comment. I am atheist and I am skeptical that God exists- I find it silly to assert that it is impossible for all loosely defined Gods do not exist. Please get your facts straight before replying to someone. Learn the difference between a strong and weak atheist.
Now please- provide me the method you used to disprove Zeus. I'll use your method to disprove Yahweh.
Zeus is merely a false god of Satan, the Great Deceiver. The idea of "Zeus" exists, but Zeus himself is a mere illusion. This is part and parcel of the Great Deceiver's work!
Militant atheists are funny. The "live and let live" worldview just doesn't compute with them and that worldview usually only doesn't compute with the ultra, super, religious. Ironic, no?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users