Conquer Club

Second Rate Citizens

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Woodruff on Wed May 01, 2013 7:18 pm

Here's an outstanding example of what we're trying to say regarding dumbass felonies:

http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/16-year-old-girl-arrested-and-charged-felony-science-project-mistake

How does all of this warrant a felony? This is retarded. Might I think differently if it were a student who was consistently in trouble with the school authorities and who had repeated violations of school rules? Absolutely. But in this particular situation, it is total asshat (I am creating nouns today) to arrest this student and charge her with a felony. This isn't a racism issue (I'm fairly sure), it's a retarded-zero-tolerance issue.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Funkyterrance on Wed May 01, 2013 10:05 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:In both instances, neither of us had intended to commit a crime, and we turned ourselves in.

In my associate's case, he wrote the bad check at a store I worked at. My store called him, and he agreed to come in to pay it with cash, meanwhile a police officer was called to the store to arrest him when he got there. Sure enough, the detective who came to the store let him pay it with cash before taking him to jail.
His story was that his gf spent the money in his checking account without telling him. Sounds pretty plausible.

And in my case I hit a bicyclist with the passenger-side mirror of this van the same day I bought it. I was driving it home with no plates or insurance, and I thought what I hit was a road-sign. But it turned out the bicyclist hit the road sign. Anyway, I parked my van on the street in plain sight, and when the cops showed up at my house, I gave a written confession and everything, all without a lawyer. I didn't even know I was in trouble. That was the week of my 19th birthday, and so I've got this felony for life, no rehabilitation, no redemption, no anything.

And while I agree that hitting a bicyclist and driving away (there were other cars that drove away too, confirming my belief that I hit a sign) is very shitty, it was also very obviously an accident, or why the hell else would I even do the confession? Now since I was 19 I've had the same resume as a rapist or murderer.

EDIT: Oh yeah, and crazy turn of events; my associate lost his job when the economy took a dive. He couldn't find a job anywhere, being a felon and all, and he ended up selling dope. That's why I just say he's an associate. I don't like the guy anymore. It's pretty sad that he went from just a normal honest kid to not caring anymore.

These explanations shed more light on your earlier post. ;)

Woodruff wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:I have a felony for failure to render aid after a traffic accident.

I know a cat who got a felony for writing a bad check over $200.

There are over 1 million felony convictions nationwide each year.

Think about that.

The public doesn't know sh*t about how felonies work.



Wait, what are you saying? That those offenses are minor? Writing a bad check over $200 is serious theft under the right circumstances and failure to render aid can be equally shitty.
I'm not saying they are necessarily awful, depends on the scenario, but just to mention them as evidence that people don't understand felonies doesn't seem complete.


I don't think anyone disagrees with what you're saying as far as severity, necessarily. But none of those things are worthy of losing a Constitutional right, which is what happens with a felony conviction. It's like crimes that are felonies have become extremely commonplace items yet the resultant consequences haven't slid down the scale at all, and that doesn't make sense.

Right, like when people envision a felon(as JB was alluding earlier) they don't picture someone like JB, they picture a serial murderer, rapist, etc.. That's partly the reason why I don't think people should lose the right to own a gun with a felony charge, especially if the charge has nothing to do with guns. The other reason is that, like I mentioned earlier, that if you've served your sentence shouldn't you be more or less back to square one as far as rights are concerned?

I can see taking someone's rights away if they've had numbers of infractions and not learned their lesson but losing a right for one mistake that is potentially not even related to the right lost does seem a bit irrational.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Woodruff on Wed May 01, 2013 10:41 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:Right, like when people envision a felon(as JB was alluding earlier) they don't picture someone like JB, they picture a serial murderer, rapist, etc.. That's partly the reason why I don't think people should lose the right to own a gun with a felony charge, especially if the charge has nothing to do with guns. The other reason is that, like I mentioned earlier, that if you've served your sentence shouldn't you be more or less back to square one as far as rights are concerned?


While I personally agree with you, that could only be true if our judicial system was actually about rehabilitation. But it's not...it's about punishment. There is no room for rehabilitation in our judicial system.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re:

Postby john9blue on Wed May 01, 2013 11:00 pm

2dimes wrote:BBS would shoot your eye out.


was i the only one who got this pun?

was this even supposed to be a pun?

Image
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Postby 2dimes on Wed May 01, 2013 11:20 pm

It was a movie reference. Puns are when you use a word that is the same or close to another word.

I'm kind of grumpy that bouncing a cheque can make a person into a felon.
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13095
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re:

Postby john9blue on Wed May 01, 2013 11:25 pm

2dimes wrote:It was a movie reference. Puns are when you use a word that is the same or close to another word.

I'm kind of grumpy that bouncing a cheque can make a person into a felon.


BBS would shoot your eye out

BB's would shoot your eye out

BB gun



...i guess it's kind of a stretch
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Lootifer on Wed May 01, 2013 11:28 pm

Only people who use cheques are Saxi and BBS anyway. No big loss if those chumps get felonys.
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Postby 2dimes on Wed May 01, 2013 11:35 pm

Do you mean cash that's so old it smells funny.
john9blue wrote:...i guess it's kind of a stretch


I like your style.
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13095
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Juan_Bottom on Wed May 01, 2013 11:53 pm

Schoolgirl tries science experiment, arrested for felony

This student at Bartow High School in Florida allegedly thought she'd put a couple of household chemicals in an 8-ounce water bottle, just to see the reaction.

The reaction was that she was expelled and marched off in handcuffs, accused of felony possession/discharge of a dangerous weapon.


lol, this place ](*,)
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby john9blue on Thu May 02, 2013 1:30 am

^ yeah i heard about that

i'm usually the last person to cry "racism" but i don't see how else she could possibly have been expelled...

has the idiotic weapons hysteria really gotten that bad in this country?

edit: i do find it kinda funny that leftist websites which are fueling this hysteria are suddenly upset when people like these floridans take it too far...
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Gillipig on Thu May 02, 2013 3:01 am

Woodruff wrote:
kentington wrote:I see it brought up a lot that felons can't use guns as an argument that people want restrictions on guns when they claim they don't. (I hope that makes sense).

My question is this:

Are felons second rate citizens? If they no longer have the rights of normal citizens, then does that count as a restriction on the 2nd Amendment?


Felons are classed as second-rate citizens, I think. Unfortunately, probably rightly so. I would like to see some sort of a time-based "earn your rights back" capability, but I can at least understand why it's necessary for their rights to be restricted in the manner they are. Other than the right to vote...I never really understood why that was taken away from them, to be honest.

As for that counting as a restriction on the 2nd Amendment, of course it does. It is one. It sort of has to.

kentington wrote:What rights should felons have/not have?


Well, I certainly understand a restriction on their ability to own a firearm. I would like to see this be something they could earn back over a long period of time, personally.
As I mentioned above, I have never understood why they cannot vote.
There are some other restrictions, like a restriction on travel abroad, but that is mostly levied by the foreign governments, so that is unavoidable and understandable.
There are some (varies by state) restrictions on the ability to hold public office. This is probably unnecessary, as anyone who is going to be elected would have to go through "why were you a convicted felon" in the campaign, so it would come out in the wash anyway.

kentington wrote:Is this constitutional and should it be?


Yes. It's perfectly acceptable to have reasonable limitations on our freedoms and rights. The key, and difficulty certainly, is that word "reasonable" because different people will view that word differently for each freedom and right, based on their personal priorities and worldviews.

You want a once convicted criminal to in time be able to legally buy a gun?? Man, you must be klingon!
They should keep their right to vote though, but I'm not sure they care about that right very much. Politics is just a big farce anyway so they're not missing out on anything important.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
User avatar
Lieutenant Gillipig
 
Posts: 3565
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Juan_Bottom on Thu May 02, 2013 8:31 pm

What's the reasoning behind not allowing someone convicted of any crime from buying a gun?
I know the history behind it, but what's the logic behind it?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby notyou2 on Thu May 02, 2013 8:58 pm

Umm.......less violent gun related crimes....................
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Juan_Bottom on Thu May 02, 2013 9:21 pm

The Fire Arms Ban of '38 is responsible for all of this, but it just hasn't done that. We still have a legal free market for criminals to buy guns. You just don't want to be caught by the cops with one. And actually, it's gotten easier for criminals to get guns, while at the same time all sorts of crimes that weren't felonies before have become felonies. So it's easier to become a criminal, and it's easier to buy a gun as a criminal. With at least 1 million felony convictions a year, I am failing to see the logic in all of this.


Somehow, Reagan declared a war on Crime, then signed the law that allowed criminals to buy guns without background checks. And he's worshiped for it.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby BigBallinStalin on Fri May 03, 2013 3:40 am

Juan_Bottom wrote:The Fire Arms Ban of '38 is responsible for all of this, but it just hasn't done that. We still have a legal free market for criminals to buy guns. You just don't want to be caught by the cops with one. And actually, it's gotten easier for criminals to get guns, while at the same time all sorts of crimes that weren't felonies before have become felonies. So it's easier to become a criminal, and it's easier to buy a gun as a criminal. With at least 1 million felony convictions a year, I am failing to see the logic in all of this.


Somehow, Reagan declared a war on Crime, then signed the law that allowed criminals to buy guns without background checks. And he's worshiped for it.


Great contradiction, JB.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Juan_Bottom on Fri May 03, 2013 4:21 pm

Yeah, but it's not my contradiction.
This is one of those dumb ideas we've been arguing about in the gun control thread. In over 40% of gun sales it's perfectly legal to sell a gun to someone on the ATF's DO NOT SELL list. You don't even have to record the sale, and you don't need any identification from the buyer. Al Qaeda spokesmen talk about it. Politicians talk about it. Jon Stewert talks about it.
You buy a gun anywhere but a gun store and there's no background check required.
You just don't want to be caught with it.
"Leave the gun, take the cannoli."
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Phatscotty on Sat May 04, 2013 8:58 pm

kentington wrote:I see it brought up a lot that felons can't use guns as an argument that people want restrictions on guns when they claim they don't. (I hope that makes sense).

My question is this:

Are felons second rate citizens? If they no longer have the rights of normal citizens, then does that count as a restriction on the 2nd Amendment?

What rights should felons have/not have?

Is this constitutional and should it be?


They are definitely second class/rate whatever you want to call it. Sometimes felons can get their rights back, depending on the circumstances.

The golden rule seems to be if you infringe on another person's rights, the state will infringe on yours on the citizen's behalf since we aim to reduce said crime in the future, and that is supposed to the be the deterrent against crime.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Woodruff on Sat May 04, 2013 9:03 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
kentington wrote:I see it brought up a lot that felons can't use guns as an argument that people want restrictions on guns when they claim they don't. (I hope that makes sense).

My question is this:

Are felons second rate citizens? If they no longer have the rights of normal citizens, then does that count as a restriction on the 2nd Amendment?

What rights should felons have/not have?

Is this constitutional and should it be?


They are by definition second class/rate whatever you want to call it.


Wait, what? You're saying that it is by definition that some Americans are considered "second rate citizens"?

Phatscotty wrote:The golden rule seems to be if you infringe on another person's rights, the state will infringe on yours on the citizen's behalf since we aim to reduce said crime in the future, and that is supposed to the be the deterrent against crime.


Bullshit. The War on Drugs is the greatest offender against our liberty, and the majority of those charged in The War on Drugs are not infringing on the rights of others and for those who are, it is almost always directly attributable to the whole idea behind The War on Drugs. Prohibition doesn't work.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Phatscotty on Sat May 04, 2013 9:06 pm

Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
kentington wrote:I see it brought up a lot that felons can't use guns as an argument that people want restrictions on guns when they claim they don't. (I hope that makes sense).

My question is this:

Are felons second rate citizens? If they no longer have the rights of normal citizens, then does that count as a restriction on the 2nd Amendment?

What rights should felons have/not have?

Is this constitutional and should it be?


They are by definition second class/rate whatever you want to call it. Sometimes felons can get their rights back, depending on the circumstances.


Wait, what? You're saying that it is by definition that some Americans are considered "second rate citizens"?



viewtopic.php?f=8&t=190066#p4154958

Woodruff wrote:
Felons are classed as second-rate citizens, I think. Unfortunately, probably rightly so. I would like to see some sort of a time-based "earn your rights back" capability....


I said the exact same thing you said, and you trolled it! HYPOCRITE OF ALL HYPOCRITES!
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Symmetry on Sat May 04, 2013 9:15 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
kentington wrote:I see it brought up a lot that felons can't use guns as an argument that people want restrictions on guns when they claim they don't. (I hope that makes sense).

My question is this:

Are felons second rate citizens? If they no longer have the rights of normal citizens, then does that count as a restriction on the 2nd Amendment?

What rights should felons have/not have?

Is this constitutional and should it be?


They are by definition second class/rate whatever you want to call it. Sometimes felons can get their rights back, depending on the circumstances.


Wait, what? You're saying that it is by definition that some Americans are considered "second rate citizens"?



viewtopic.php?f=8&t=190066#p4154958

Woodruff wrote:
Felons are classed as second-rate citizens, I think. Unfortunately, probably rightly so. I would like to see some sort of a time-based "earn your rights back" capability....


I said the exact same thing you said, and you trolled it!


I'm not sure where the trolling is, at least on his part.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Woodruff on Sat May 04, 2013 10:13 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
kentington wrote:I see it brought up a lot that felons can't use guns as an argument that people want restrictions on guns when they claim they don't. (I hope that makes sense).

My question is this:

Are felons second rate citizens? If they no longer have the rights of normal citizens, then does that count as a restriction on the 2nd Amendment?

What rights should felons have/not have?

Is this constitutional and should it be?


They are by definition second class/rate whatever you want to call it. Sometimes felons can get their rights back, depending on the circumstances.


Wait, what? You're saying that it is by definition that some Americans are considered "second rate citizens"?


viewtopic.php?f=8&t=190066#p4154958

Woodruff wrote:
Felons are classed as second-rate citizens, I think. Unfortunately, probably rightly so. I would like to see some sort of a time-based "earn your rights back" capability....


I said the exact same thing you said, and you trolled it! HYPOCRITE OF ALL HYPOCRITES!


You don't think the term "by definition" means anything as opposed to "I think", Phatscotty? I know you like to try to point me out as a hypocrite because I point out your hypocricy so often, but you've definitely missed the mark on this one.

"Hypocrite of all hypocrites" indeed...how freaking ironic is that?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Woodruff on Sat May 04, 2013 10:14 pm

Symmetry wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
kentington wrote:I see it brought up a lot that felons can't use guns as an argument that people want restrictions on guns when they claim they don't. (I hope that makes sense).

My question is this:

Are felons second rate citizens? If they no longer have the rights of normal citizens, then does that count as a restriction on the 2nd Amendment?

What rights should felons have/not have?

Is this constitutional and should it be?


They are by definition second class/rate whatever you want to call it. Sometimes felons can get their rights back, depending on the circumstances.


Wait, what? You're saying that it is by definition that some Americans are considered "second rate citizens"?


viewtopic.php?f=8&t=190066#p4154958

Woodruff wrote:
Felons are classed as second-rate citizens, I think. Unfortunately, probably rightly so. I would like to see some sort of a time-based "earn your rights back" capability....


I said the exact same thing you said, and you trolled it!


I'm not sure where the trolling is, at least on his part.


As with everything else, it's only in his mind. It's fascinating how he finds time to respond to my posts when he thinks he has "a gotcha", but can't be bothered when I'm asking him legitimate questions about his positions.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Juan_Bottom on Sat May 04, 2013 10:28 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
kentington wrote:I see it brought up a lot that felons can't use guns as an argument that people want restrictions on guns when they claim they don't. (I hope that makes sense).

My question is this:

Are felons second rate citizens? If they no longer have the rights of normal citizens, then does that count as a restriction on the 2nd Amendment?

What rights should felons have/not have?

Is this constitutional and should it be?


They are definitely second class/rate whatever you want to call it. Sometimes felons can get their rights back, depending on the circumstances.

The golden rule seems to be if you infringe on another person's rights, the state will infringe on yours on the citizen's behalf since we aim to reduce said crime in the future, and that is supposed to the be the deterrent against crime.


I agree with you in principle, but not in practice. Victims get their rights back, whether that's property or money or whatever, but the criminal loses his Constitutional rights for life. Losing your Constitutional protections for life because you bounced a check is extreme, harsh, and irrational, I think.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby Funkyterrance on Sat May 04, 2013 11:31 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote: Losing your Constitutional protections for life because you bounced a check is extreme, harsh, and irrational, I think.

I would even go so far as to call it wrong. It has a rationale of the "better safe than sorry" brand but it's inhumane to take a constitutional right away from someone permanently imho. 10 years, 20 years, whatever it takes for someone to appreciate their rights is possibly understandable but to say 'never and under no circumstances' is going to instill all the wrong emotions/reactions in someone who has lost a right.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Funkyterrance
 
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:52 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Second Rate Citizens

Postby kentington on Sun May 05, 2013 12:39 am

Juan_Bottom wrote:I agree with you in principle, but not in practice. Victims get their rights back, whether that's property or money or whatever, but the criminal loses his Constitutional rights for life. Losing your Constitutional protections for life because you bounced a check is extreme, harsh, and irrational, I think.


I think the majority agree here. Felons shouldn't be allowed to own firearms. The definition of a felony should change.
It should be illegal to write bad checks, but not a felony unless you can prove it was intentional. Burden of proof on the accuser. I mean if you pay the money for the bounced check and you pay the fee to the bank, no harm.

Just like Woody said, not everything can be black and white.
-
Juan, do you think this could be the governments attempt at revoking the right to bear arms? By taking away more and more people's rights with frivolous convictions of felonies?
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
User avatar
Sergeant kentington
 
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:50 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users