Which number do you roll the most?

[jammyjames]

This all goes back to the age old suggestion of "no dice" games.

I for one would love to have an option where I don't get rammed in the arse by dice every game i play.

Starting using Dominating12.com the other day, dice are a hell of a lot different & as of yet, I haven't received any unquestionable random!

[DaGip]

For me it's the No.2..not a good number to roll the most in either attack or defense.

same here...number 2. That's considered crap in most languages.

However, my average is 3.50 overall. Still, pretty crappy dice.

[DaGip]

can u see the naked woman in my avatar?
its like a hidden mona lisa.

I jerk off to your avatar every time I see it.

[jwiedlin]

I believe the discrepancy for dice "1" rolls lies in the behavior of risk attacks.

A roll of a "1" on an individual die by an attacker will more likely result in the loss of an attacking troop. This reduces the chance of a future attack. A stack of 4 attackers versus a stack of 20 defenders has the possibility of rolling "6" 30 times, but can only roll "1" a maximum of 4 times.

[Metsfanmax]

I believe the discrepancy for dice "1" rolls lies in the behavior of risk attacks.

A roll of a "1" on an individual die by an attacker will more likely result in the loss of an attacking troop. This reduces the chance of a future attack. A stack of 4 attackers versus a stack of 20 defenders has the possibility of rolling "6" 30 times, but can only roll "1" a maximum of 4 times.

No. While your first sentence is correct -- rolling a 1 does make you less likely to attack next than rolling a 6 -- the distribution is theoretically independent of what has previously happened. If I roll ten winning battles in a row, I'm just as likely to roll a 1 in the next roll as a 6. The problem is indeed that the dice were drawn from a non-uniform distribution.