Moderator: Community Team
strike wolf wrote:Probably Jay.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
ritz627 wrote:Yea, jay, I'm sorry to inform you, but smotlz is not only better skill-wise, he is more versitle and durable. I know you want to say glavine was better b/c he plays for your team, but he's just not.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:ritz627 wrote:Yea, jay, I'm sorry to inform you, but smotlz is not only better skill-wise, he is more versitle and durable. I know you want to say glavine was better b/c he plays for your team, but he's just not.
The team as a whole is better and that will be the decider!
That's only why Glavine has almost 100 more wins, 1000 more innings pitched, and 9 more shutouts. However Smoltz has 154 more saves, like 450 less walks, 300 more strikeouts, and a .20 lower career ERA.ritz627 wrote:Yea, jay, I'm sorry to inform you, but smotlz is not only better skill-wise, he is more versitle and durable. I know you want to say glavine was better b/c he plays for your team, but he's just not.
GosoxJ wrote:That's only why Glavine has almost 100 more wins, 1000 more innings pitched, and 9 more shutouts. However Smoltz has 154 more saves, like 450 less walks, 300 more strikeouts, and a .20 lower career ERA.ritz627 wrote:Yea, jay, I'm sorry to inform you, but smotlz is not only better skill-wise, he is more versitle and durable. I know you want to say glavine was better b/c he plays for your team, but he's just not.
Glavine vs. Smoltz...Smoltz for sure.ritz627 wrote:GosoxJ wrote:That's only why Glavine has almost 100 more wins, 1000 more innings pitched, and 9 more shutouts. However Smoltz has 154 more saves, like 450 less walks, 300 more strikeouts, and a .20 lower career ERA.ritz627 wrote:Yea, jay, I'm sorry to inform you, but smotlz is not only better skill-wise, he is more versitle and durable. I know you want to say glavine was better b/c he plays for your team, but he's just not.
Exactly, the reason Smoltz has less wins and less innings, and less shutouts is because he was a closer for most of his career. I guess it is debatable who is more durable, but I still say Smoltz is more versitle and just plain better.
ritz627 wrote:GosoxJ wrote:That's only why Glavine has almost 100 more wins, 1000 more innings pitched, and 9 more shutouts. However Smoltz has 154 more saves, like 450 less walks, 300 more strikeouts, and a .20 lower career ERA.ritz627 wrote:Yea, jay, I'm sorry to inform you, but smotlz is not only better skill-wise, he is more versitle and durable. I know you want to say glavine was better b/c he plays for your team, but he's just not.
Exactly, the reason Smoltz has less wins and less innings, and less shutouts is because he was a closer for most of his career. I guess it is debatable who is more durable, but I still say Smoltz is more versitle and just plain better.
unriggable wrote:f*ck the yankees.
dominationnation wrote:unriggable wrote:f*ck the yankees.
and the mets. and the red sox. and the astros. and the nationals. and the padres. and every other team besides he cardinals
dominationnation wrote:unriggable wrote:f*ck the yankees.
and the mets. and the red sox. and the astros. and the nationals. and the padres. and every other team besides he cardinals
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
sfhbballnut wrote:under .500 is always good, of course lower is always better
Users browsing this forum: jusplay4fun