WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Ok, so D1 this was vaguely an acceptable reason to vote. Charm didnt really back up her vote on Sempai and sheeped. But come D2 why is Ragian still continuing to push exclusively on the same person he has pushed all game with no additional information added? This is whats been bothering me about Rage. There is nothing outside of focus on Charm for mild misdemeanors. I agree that Charm has not been particularly helpful so far, and could be mafia, but thats not a reason to focus. This is all made worse by the, "Pix has been just as bad, but I dont want him lynched" section. There is little difference between the two players in terms of experience.
Wrong. There is the very huge difference that I don't know charm (or her meta or whatever you call it). I know Pix. So far he's playing like he always does. I stand by my vote on charm from D1. To me, she was fishing for information that would benefit scum more than town. Moreover, she sheeped/bandwagoned. D2, she has done f*ck all except for fossing Harry Potter.I can't see how she has been silenced when she's able to post. If she had limited posts, why not sit back, read, and then put out some quality instead of this vague "don't bother with me". It sounds like an excuse not to do anything.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:@Rage - What are your intentions with your lack of vote? Pressure? Claim? Are you basing it only on the fact that.. oh wait no there is no vote.
When in games with loads of people I don't know, I am very prudish with my vote. That's just how I play. Also, as mentioned, it was a rough weekend. I don't like just barging in voting for something that will be half-arsed on my part.
Counting game: sempai has 50+
So, this is the stuff that endgame is looking at:
MudPuppy wrote:Unvote
Vote Pershy
OK Semp... It's on you. Hope a tie would result in a no lynch so we can get a read from Mad Eye tonight and not lynch Snape.
Then he explains himself here:
MudPuppy wrote:@dd, my bad math accounted for sempai's double vote. In that instance, 1+1=3 for the tie. I unvoted because Pershy got too many votes and I was aiming for No Lynch. I would have preferred a Storr lynch but he was on and I thought a necessary component to saving Severus. I was wrong. I was retabulating votes when day ended but was seconds away from voting deg in hopes of getting back to a tie... But it woudn't have mattered. Not sure if Stor was simply playing me to save his ass (of which I was aware) or playing me to lynch Pershy (of which I knew was a risk but was caught off guard by amount of last second activity). Wondering if scum can communicate during day as that lynch felt like it may have been coordinated.
I see it as MP believes the claims and doesn't want an investigative role or the town vig lynched. That makes sense, though, doesn't it?
Endgame422 wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE PERSHY
Dd came and defended himself nicely.
Why did you vote for Pershy?
FP'ed by virus
