Streaker wrote:strike wolf wrote:fp'ed by Streaker. Don't know how fast it was. Probably just missed that there was a new post when I was doing my preview.
I believe I have countered your last argument about no input by fastposting you. Must also concede on your point where I say 'getting the party started' and following it up with a joke vote. Honest mistake there.
Yeah honest mistake there. You made 4 posts prior to this one on the page. One in which you basically agreed with IB and then restated what has already been said a few times. One in where you call out Mars to clarify on why he's calling you out (a minor attack on Mars) and two where you attacked the person calling you out. [sarcasm]Yeah really counters my opinion that a lot of your activity has been in response to people calling you out as suspicious.[/sarcasm]
Streaker wrote:Also, I wagoned twice in this game (mitch first, then endgame). I voted mitch to get information if he was absent, or on a restriction. Once we got confirmation that he was not absent, I left it.
You wagoned Mitch based on the same reasons I provided (which already weren't revolutionary to mafia gaming). You did little more than say you agreed with IB before voting Endgame. I don't really count those as serious content posts.
Streaker wrote:My wagon on endgame is valid, I feel. The case made is good, and I support it. It's not a mindless wagon.
I followed up with 2 meaningfull posts on Mars, something I am very eager to look further into, and will do so soon.
It's not a mindless wagon but it's not like you are the one driving the wagon. That is (or at least was) IB. I already stated my opinion of your Mars attack earlier in this post.
Endgame422 wrote:Funny you should mention that game.
My role in this one is very,VERY similiar to that.
So you don't want to claim but you have no problem giving a soft claim. Got it.
Endgame422 wrote:As for whos scum my top pick has it to be boss.
First off his back and forth with aage thus far regarding the last person to vote strategy seemed strange,seemed like suggesting a random lynch D1(which i usually read as a scum move because it leaves noone accountable for anything)
Then his vote on me was a pure wagon, he only adressess the vote with 3 words.
bosaardbeitje wrote:unvote vote Endgame for flawed reasoning
Then his most recent post using some pretty convoluted logic to decide dakky has admitted to being scum,which not only doesnt really make alot of sense,but i disagree with the conclusion that dakky is scum.
A scum dakky i do not think would stick his neck out for me even the little bit he has,in my experience,dakky as scum just lays as low as possible and only really pops in when mentioned or called.
Ill agree strikes huge post seemed like fluff but that doesn't really say much about his alignment to me.
I will say it is good to get some more content from you but I am not sure how I feel about you effectively picking out the newest person as your choice. So...I've got a more or less neutral opinion on this part of the post.
Brief list of those I think could be scum:
1. Streaker-Above reasons. His play bugs me in this game with a lot of posts that seem like fluff to me and a borderline OMGus attack on Mars. It could be legitimate but I could also see a scum Streaker using a weak case against him as a launching point to discredit not only the attack but the attacker as well.
2. Endgame-IB summed up initial reasons fairly nicely. I don't like the automatic jump assumption that PR enforcer is mafia though his excuse is possibly viable (I know I've made dumber mistakes). I am also like IB suspicious of the interactions between Endgame and Dakky. Finally, I am as said above skeptical about the fact that he pointed out the newest player as his vote.
3. Dakky-As mentioned above his interactions with Endgame. He could just be a dissenter to the bandwagon but his reasoning for why he has held off on the Endgame wagon has been pretty lacking and if I am to believe that he is simply a dissenter I need to hear more from him on that front. Furthermore his interactions in this game beyond that have also seemed lacking.
People who need to speak up.
1. Madmitch-unless he is completely blocked from posting we still do need to hear something from him today.
2. Hotshot-Okay he is still catching up but I respect his opinions if he is town and if he's scum, I can't make a read on someone who isn't posting.
Town read:
1. Tim-This is my only town read. He has said a couple things that sound debatable but his entire presence in this game has seemed like newish town to me.
I considered putting IB on the town list but he's a veteran player and less than 9 pages into Day 1 is too early to make that kind of judgment on a player of his experience and skill level.