Conquer Club

U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

VOTE FOR ONE (FEBRUARY 20, 2016) ...

Poll ended at Fri Oct 30, 2015 5:08 pm

 
Total votes : 0

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby saxitoxin on Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:55 am

mrswdk wrote:How does that work? I thought Sanders just slaughtered Clinton in the second round?


big whoop
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13398
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby saxitoxin on Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:59 am

America is democracy where people free to choose anyone they want as leader. Provided they don't choose wrong leader.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13398
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby mrswdk on Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:17 pm

Found a great piece of commentary in that article:

Nearly all of those who said only Sanders is honest and trustworthy said he got their vote.


Who woulda thunk it?
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby mrswdk on Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:17 pm

What I want to know is, who are those people who said only Sanders is trustworthy and then voted for Clinton?
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby jgordon1111 on Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:38 pm

Has no one paid attention at all to what has been said, if not what struck me was that Ted Cruz and Hillary both are being supported by Goldman-Sachs, which says that they are hedging their bets on both parties, and what do they gain from this, both are viable canidates to win, not sure about anyone else but this looks fishy to me,
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby tkr4lf on Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:56 pm

Only sort of related, but I didn't want to start a whole new topic for this.

I got a good laugh at it though.

http://nypost.com/2015/01/11/sorry-liberals-scandinavian-countries-arent-utopias/


If only natty were around to corroborate the stuff about Finnish males...
User avatar
Major tkr4lf
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 am
Location: St. Louis

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby Symmetry on Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:01 pm

jgordon111 wrote:Ted Cruz and Hillary


This raises an interesting question that came up in the last presidential election. Why the bias in naming among certain groups?

I'm genuinely interested in why you went with "Ted Cruz", and " Hillary" as your terms. In the last election, those who tacitly accepted Willard Romney's preferred name of "Mitt", provided an interesting point of hypocrisy for posters who insisted on " Barack Hussein Obama".

Your thoughts?
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby jgordon1111 on Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:53 pm

Symmetry wrote:
jgordon111 wrote:Ted Cruz and Hillary


This raises an interesting question that came up in the last presidential election. Why the bias in naming among certain groups?

I'm genuinely interested in why you went with "Ted Cruz", and " Hillary" as your terms. In the last election, those who tacitly accepted Willard Romney's preferred name of "Mitt", provided an interesting point of hypocrisy for posters who insisted on " Barack Hussein Obama".

Your thoughts?


Ok I don't like you and normally ignore your posts
But on this one I will explain I said it the way I did so it would be perfectly clear who I was talking about, I used Cruz's first and last name because some dolt like yourself may have possibly thought I was referring to someone else, I used Hillary only because she is the only woman left in the race at this point, so if someone mistook who I meant there they shouldn't be speaking in this thread, it would be beyond their learning curve.

And as far as Barack Obama I never use his middle name personally, because when people see it they automatically think muslim and the negative conotations it infers in a certain mindset group.

Btw do you realize where his middle name originates from and what it means?
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby Symmetry on Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:35 am

jgordon1111 wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
jgordon111 wrote:Ted Cruz and Hillary


This raises an interesting question that came up in the last presidential election. Why the bias in naming among certain groups?

I'm genuinely interested in why you went with "Ted Cruz", and " Hillary" as your terms. In the last election, those who tacitly accepted Willard Romney's preferred name of "Mitt", provided an interesting point of hypocrisy for posters who insisted on " Barack Hussein Obama".

Your thoughts?


1) Ok I don't like you and normally ignore your posts

2) But on this one I will explain I said it the way I did so it would be perfectly clear who I was talking about, I used Cruz's first and last name because some dolt like yourself may have possibly thought I was referring to someone else, I used Hillary only because she is the only woman left in the race at this point, so if someone mistook who I meant there they shouldn't be speaking in this thread, it would be beyond their learning curve.

3) And as far as Barack Obama I never use his middle name personally, because when people see it they automatically think muslim and the negative conotations it infers in a certain mindset group.

4) Btw do you realize where his middle name originates from and what it means?


Now, I've gone and added some numbers to your post so that folk can follow and all.

1) OK, I borrowed your sig, your clan threw a hissy fit, a bunch of other people found it hilarious. It was pretty funny.

2) This makes no sense.

3) Huh, you sure? Because,...

4) ... It seems to be your last point.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby Metsfanmax on Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:17 am

Symmetry wrote:
jgordon111 wrote:Ted Cruz and Hillary


This raises an interesting question that came up in the last presidential election. Why the bias in naming among certain groups?


Are you sure there's a bias? Since Ted Cruz's actual first name is Rafael I'm pretty sure jgordon is doing him a solid here.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby Dukasaur on Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:23 am

jgordon1111 wrote:Has no one paid attention at all to what has been said, if not what struck me was that Ted Cruz and Hillary both are being supported by Goldman-Sachs, which says that they are hedging their bets on both parties, and what do they gain from this, both are viable canidates to win, not sure about anyone else but this looks fishy to me,

Pretty normal for large corporate donors to hedge their bets. Their mission is to make sure they will have friends in high places regardless of which way the wind blows on election day.
ā€œā€ŽLife is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.ā€
― Voltaire
User avatar
Lieutenant Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28081
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby jgordon1111 on Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:23 pm

Dukasaur wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:Has no one paid attention at all to what has been said, if not what struck me was that Ted Cruz and Hillary both are being supported by Goldman-Sachs, which says that they are hedging their bets on both parties, and what do they gain from this, both are viable canidates to win, not sure about anyone else but this looks fishy to me,

Pretty normal for large corporate donors to hedge their bets. Their mission is to make sure they will have friends in high places regardless of which way the wind blows on election day.



Yes Duk I know but one canidate in particular is saying they can't be bought by Goldman-Sachs, And people believe it.
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby notyou2 on Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:12 pm

Symmetry wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
jgordon111 wrote:Ted Cruz and Hillary


This raises an interesting question that came up in the last presidential election. Why the bias in naming among certain groups?

I'm genuinely interested in why you went with "Ted Cruz", and " Hillary" as your terms. In the last election, those who tacitly accepted Willard Romney's preferred name of "Mitt", provided an interesting point of hypocrisy for posters who insisted on " Barack Hussein Obama".

Your thoughts?


1) Ok I don't like you and normally ignore your posts

2) But on this one I will explain I said it the way I did so it would be perfectly clear who I was talking about, I used Cruz's first and last name because some dolt like yourself may have possibly thought I was referring to someone else, I used Hillary only because she is the only woman left in the race at this point, so if someone mistook who I meant there they shouldn't be speaking in this thread, it would be beyond their learning curve.

3) And as far as Barack Obama I never use his middle name personally, because when people see it they automatically think muslim and the negative conotations it infers in a certain mindset group.

4) Btw do you realize where his middle name originates from and what it means?


Now, I've gone and added some numbers to your post so that folk can follow and all.

1) OK, I borrowed your sig, your clan threw a hissy fit, a bunch of other people found it hilarious. It was pretty funny.

2) This makes no sense.

3) Huh, you sure? Because,...

4) ... It seems to be your last point.



Don't you have something better to do than troll?
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby tkr4lf on Sat Feb 13, 2016 10:33 pm

Well f*ck you guys then I thought it was a cool article.
User avatar
Major tkr4lf
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 am
Location: St. Louis

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby jgordon1111 on Sat Feb 13, 2016 10:37 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
jgordon111 wrote:Ted Cruz and Hillary


This raises an interesting question that came up in the last presidential election. Why the bias in naming among certain groups?


Are you sure there's a bias? Since Ted Cruz's actual first name is Rafael I'm pretty sure jgordon is doing him a solid here.


I was aware max, just seeing if symturd, who likes to point and spout ignorant shit, was even aware of it, but no he just wants to try comedy to hide his learning curve limitations,come on symturd say something smart, show your as smart as you pretend you are for once
Btw symturd Rafael Edward Cruz is his whole name, the more you know
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby jgordon1111 on Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:42 pm

Here it is, the reason I will not vote for Jeb! Or Hillary, I don't believe the office of the president was deigned for dynastic rule, if the founding father's wanted that they would have made George Washington king, he declined the offer.enough is enough, Hillary keeps parading the next royal family member out for America to see and get used to I think it odd she is speaking for mommy on numerous occasions,as for jabs family his dad was a good president his brother was a lying idiot, who got the office because, oddly enough it came down to the state that Jeb was govener of that swung the vote his way, so no to those two. If you got to vote republican it looks like kasich, democrat it is Sanders, because they seem to be lying less than everyone else and less of a hidden agenda than everyone else
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby tzor on Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:41 pm

Symmetry wrote:... provided an interesting point of hypocrisy for posters who insisted on " Barack Hussein Obama".


Personally I started throwing in Hussein because otherwise his initials (BO) frankly STINKS. BHO is a lot more dignified. And frankly, just because Hussein is the first name of a secular (emphasis on that word) tyrant who screwed the majority population in his own country and attempted to assassinate George Herbert Walker Bush while getting his but kicked by both father and son, it doesn't have any of the "Oh look he's Muslim" implications that people (who are mostly against its usage anyway) want to give it.

I really wasn't into this kind of thing back in the GHWB days (although as a child I did so love "Milhous" as it is fun to say).

But really, if you want me to keep repeating Herbert Walker ...
Herbert Walker ...
Herbert Walker ...


First rule of being a kid. When you are called by your formal name, you know you are in a lot of trouble. :P

"George Herbert Walker Bush, young man. You come over here this instant and apologize to the nice actor for calling his economics 'voodoo.'"
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby saxitoxin on Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:32 pm

Image
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13398
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby Symmetry on Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:05 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:Here it is, the reason I will not vote for Jeb! Or Hillary, I don't believe the office of the president was deigned for dynastic rule, if the founding father's wanted that they would have made George Washington king, he declined the offer.enough is enough, Hillary keeps parading the next royal family member out for America to see and get used to I think it odd she is speaking for mommy on numerous occasions,as for jabs family his dad was a good president his brother was a lying idiot, who got the office because, oddly enough it came down to the state that Jeb was govener of that swung the vote his way, so no to those two. If you got to vote republican it looks like kasich, democrat it is Sanders, because they seem to be lying less than everyone else and less of a hidden agenda than everyone else


As a friendly heads up, using paragraph breaks and punctuating correctly will make your arguments read better.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby jgordon1111 on Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:23 pm

Symmetry wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:Here it is, the reason I will not vote for Jeb! Or Hillary, I don't believe the office of the president was deigned for dynastic rule, if the founding father's wanted that they would have made George Washington king, he declined the offer.enough is enough, Hillary keeps parading the next royal family member out for America to see and get used to I think it odd she is speaking for mommy on numerous occasions,as for jabs family his dad was a good president his brother was a lying idiot, who got the office because, oddly enough it came down to the state that Jeb was govener of that swung the vote his way, so no to those two. If you got to vote republican it looks like kasich, democrat it is Sanders, because they seem to be lying less than everyone else and less of a hidden agenda than everyone else


As a friendly heads up, using paragraph breaks and punctuating correctly will make your arguments read better.


Just a heads up symturd being the most prolific troll on site is not considered a good thing
FuQ
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby Symmetry on Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:34 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:Here it is, the reason I will not vote for Jeb! Or Hillary, I don't believe the office of the president was deigned for dynastic rule, if the founding father's wanted that they would have made George Washington king, he declined the offer.enough is enough, Hillary keeps parading the next royal family member out for America to see and get used to I think it odd she is speaking for mommy on numerous occasions,as for jabs family his dad was a good president his brother was a lying idiot, who got the office because, oddly enough it came down to the state that Jeb was govener of that swung the vote his way, so no to those two. If you got to vote republican it looks like kasich, democrat it is Sanders, because they seem to be lying less than everyone else and less of a hidden agenda than everyone else


As a friendly heads up, using paragraph breaks and punctuating correctly will make your arguments read better.


Just a heads up symturd, being the most prolific troll on site is not considered a good thing
FuQ


Don't feel bad about it. Nobody thinks you're the most prolific. Borderline illiterate, perhaps, but we're working on that

Did you figure out what "parody" means yet BTW?
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby saxitoxin on Sat Feb 20, 2016 8:51 pm

results logged and a new, Jeb!-less, poll is up
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13398
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby mrswdk on Sat Feb 20, 2016 9:19 pm

saxitoxin wrote:results logged and a new, Jeb!-less, poll is up


And if www.jebbush.com is anything to go by, he's now throwing his weight behind Trump =D>
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: U.S. presidential election 2016 (official thread)

Postby riskllama on Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:47 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:
Just a heads up symturd being the most prolific troll on site is not considered a good thing
FuQ

duuude...mrswdk is by far the biggest forum troll on here. it's not even close anymore, i think apologies to both injured parties are in order here...
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant riskllama
 
Posts: 8972
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: deep inside Queen Charlotte.

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users