Moderator: Community Team
josko.ri wrote:For about 2 hours, no new tournaments have been started.
ZaBeast wrote:5761 CC Olympics - Closing Ceremonies 2017-08-30 12:00 Fm
Except it has 5 games at a time. System allowed me to join it (and then I unjoined) but wouldn't it be a better idea to have a freemium-friendly tournament that won't force them to drop games?
Unless of course the game number limit can be bypassed for this tournaments like these fremium-friendly ones that allowed you to play speed or poly.
ZaBeast wrote:Unless of course the game number limit can be bypassed for this tournaments like these fremium-friendly ones that allowed you to play speed or poly.
Dukasaur wrote:dkmaster wrote:two speed games running at the same time is sure to much
I've seen people playing five or more speed games at once.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Dukasaur wrote:dkmaster wrote:two speed games running at the same time is sure to much
I've seen people playing five or more speed games at once.
I seem to recall a freestyle assassin (or something like that) tournament for the Olympics last time that was speed and resulted in 4 or 5 games simultaneously.
dkmaster wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Dukasaur wrote:dkmaster wrote:two speed games running at the same time is sure to much
I've seen people playing five or more speed games at once.
I seem to recall a freestyle assassin (or something like that) tournament for the Olympics last time that was speed and resulted in 4 or 5 games simultaneously.
We got that again. Assdoodling
It is not speed though, only freestyle and assassin
Pirlo wrote:
This has happened just now.. in a 7-payer hive game with 20 rounds limit, he begged for peace, and in the last round and without prior notice, he decided the truce is off because the game was about to end. he could not win the game, but he decided to ruin it for certain people in the favor of other certain people for that nonsense reason he mentioned in the game chat as an excuse to break the truce he implicitly asked for.
So if Josko and I were in a similar game, we are allowed have a secret diplomacy instead of competing fairly? and of course, according to this logic. It's more like a Chinese swimmer intentionally attacking and stopping an Italian swimmer to make sure Italy doesn't get a medal and secure a better place for China.
I know it's probably not illegal in CC to do this, but it's still ridiculous.
Pirlo wrote:
This has happened just now.. in a 7-payer hive game with 20 rounds limit, he begged for peace, and in the last round and without prior notice, he decided the truce is off because the game was about to end. he could not win the game, but he decided to ruin it for certain people in the favor of other certain people for that nonsense reason he mentioned in the game chat as an excuse to break the truce he implicitly asked for.
So if Josko and I were in a similar game, we are allowed have a secret diplomacy instead of competing fairly? and of course, according to this logic. It's more like a Chinese swimmer intentionally attacking and stopping an Italian swimmer to make sure Italy doesn't get a medal and secure a better place for China.
I know it's probably not illegal in CC to do this, but it's still ridiculous.
Mad777 wrote:Pirlo wrote:
This has happened just now.. in a 7-payer hive game with 20 rounds limit, he begged for peace, and in the last round and without prior notice, he decided the truce is off because the game was about to end. he could not win the game, but he decided to ruin it for certain people in the favor of other certain people for that nonsense reason he mentioned in the game chat as an excuse to break the truce he implicitly asked for.
So if Josko and I were in a similar game, we are allowed have a secret diplomacy instead of competing fairly? and of course, according to this logic. It's more like a Chinese swimmer intentionally attacking and stopping an Italian swimmer to make sure Italy doesn't get a medal and secure a better place for China.
I know it's probably not illegal in CC to do this, but it's still ridiculous.
You know what....suck it up...you have no right to say anything since you did the exact same thing against me in this Game 17656498, I comment my unhappiness in the chat after the round you did kill my stack and this would not have giving you any advantage to win but you decided who will get the most troops by this action, you did it again the round after.....so as far I'm concern your whining post is not gonna make me feeling bad, you just deserve it...perhaps next time you will act more fairly in games you have no chance to win and let the high troops players fight to each other without you making unnecessary decision...bye felicia!
Pirlo wrote:ِAgain, chill out bro, and get a life. I was not whining. I brought this to the community's attention because people will keep doing it intentionally in more games. I just doesn't feel cool.
At least this make you feeling what you have made to others...hopefully lesson learn for you, I feel you would be more attentive with 8000+ games under your belt but I guess I was wrong, and not worry for my life, I have a good life and it can't be better like it is now, other than wining the jackpot in a lottery .
As for my attack against you, it was just a normal attempt to expand in a trench game. you are taking it personal and also taking it too far by attacking my stacks in all our escalating multiplayer games (Ancient Greeks). I can provide screen shots that prove you have intentionally attacked my stacks for no reason but out of your madness over one hive game. Our hive games are freestyle multiplayer in which you don't have the usually comfortable time frame we are used to have, not to mention the fact that this event has overloaded the game count and kinda drove us mental and limited our ability to concentrate.
normal attempt to what? 2 rounds before game ends and breaking bonuses that will not add you more than 1 perhaps 2 troops per round which would not have benefit you in any case for the next 2 rounds and be the highest troops, but in my case I went from almost 60+ deployement to 30+ because you broke several of my bonuses, I wanted to add that I kept my troops at the border and didn't went further into your bonuses to not waste my count...since it would not have been benefitial for me...
EDIT: I forgot to mention I was the troop leader before your unecessary attacks.
As far our other games (Ancient Greek) yes I'm attacking your stack to position myself, sorry you are in my path and I don't think I'm breaking any rule here, I've failed in some and I've gained better position in others.
If you feel being into too much games and feel that your ability to play is reduced because your brain is overloaded then don't join that much next time, I personaly joined ALL Olympic tournament (except the speed type) and so far I've not make such a mistake because I plan my turn accordingly, I meant that I haven't suicide myself to others because of no reason...just staying where I'm and drop and end.
Watch your language and attitude. I don't think it's acceptable, especially for a moderator.
Not sure what offended you in my language when I used the words "you are an idiot", "retarded my friend", "play like a dick", those words are pretty universal...you are also unlucky since I had to deal with another "idiot" player in another Hive game who did the exact same thing and was like you not in a position to win 2 rounds before the limit.
About the fact I'm a Moderator doesn't prevent me to use common language and again I don't see where I break any rule with the above and my chat comment...At least this story will have me learning something, playing against you or Generalissimo will take me thinking differently in the future (I'm saying that because I don't use the foe tool and don't plan to).
Have a nice day Sir
Mad777 wrote:At least this make you feeling what you have made to others
Mad777 wrote:I went from almost 60+ deployement to 30+ because you broke several of my bonuses, I wanted to add that I kept my troops at the border and didn't went further into your bonuses to not waste my count...since it would not have been benefitial for me...
Mad777 wrote:As far our other games (Ancient Greek) yes I'm attacking your stack to position myself, sorry you are in my path and I don't think I'm breaking any rule here, I've failed in some and I've gained better position in others.
Mad777 wrote:If you feel being into too much games and feel that your ability to play is reduced because your brain is overloaded then don't join that much next time, I personaly joined ALL Olympic tournament (except the speed type) and so far I've not make such a mistake because I plan my turn accordingly, I meant that I haven't suicide myself to others because of no reason...just staying where I'm and drop and end.
Mad777 wrote:Not sure what offended you in my language when I used the words "you are an idiot", "retarded my friend", "play like a dick", those words are pretty universal...you are also unlucky since I had to deal with another "idiot" player in another Hive game who did the exact same thing and was like you not in a position to win 2 rounds before the limit.
Mad777 wrote:At least this story will have me learning something, playing against you or Generalissimo will take me thinking differently in the future
Mad777 wrote:(I'm saying that because I don't use the foe tool and don't plan to).
CaronylKluster wrote:Would someone mind reviewing the scorecard. I have participated in several of the tournaments now and been eliminated, but I also just won a bronze medal in Tiddly Winks. On that basis I should have more than 1 point but I don't show up in the standings.
Could someone explain why I am not in the standings. I think by this time I should have 4-6 points?
Thanks,
CK
ZaBeast wrote:Just wondering, but how is the position determined for players with the same score? For instance, in the Glow-in-the-Dark archery tournament, a lot of people (at least in my bracket, but I'd expect in the other instances as well) had 1 point (the cut-off score) so some went through and some didn't.
Mad777 wrote:ZaBeast wrote:Just wondering, but how is the position determined for players with the same score? For instance, in the Glow-in-the-Dark archery tournament, a lot of people (at least in my bracket, but I'd expect in the other instances as well) had 1 point (the cut-off score) so some went through and some didn't.
Hi bud, here is where you can found the answer for the Auto Tournament tie rules:
Rules
I'm copying the section below as well:
Scoring
By default scoring is based on number of Game Wins over the entire tournament. However, individual Rounds may Reset the scores, so that the scoring will begin again from that round. When the first round of the Tournament is seeded by score, the player's score at time of joining the tournament is used in that round only.
Ties in Score shall be broken by the following rules, applied in order:
Percentage of wins in the tournament as a whole
The cumulative number of Game rounds required to win the games they have won in the tournament (since the last point reset, or the start of the tournament if no point reset has occurred). Note: winning in less rounds is better.
The order in which the player joined the tournament (first player to join wins)
Hope this help
josko.ri wrote:Mad777 wrote:ZaBeast wrote:Just wondering, but how is the position determined for players with the same score? For instance, in the Glow-in-the-Dark archery tournament, a lot of people (at least in my bracket, but I'd expect in the other instances as well) had 1 point (the cut-off score) so some went through and some didn't.
Hi bud, here is where you can found the answer for the Auto Tournament tie rules:
Rules
I'm copying the section below as well:
Scoring
By default scoring is based on number of Game Wins over the entire tournament. However, individual Rounds may Reset the scores, so that the scoring will begin again from that round. When the first round of the Tournament is seeded by score, the player's score at time of joining the tournament is used in that round only.
Ties in Score shall be broken by the following rules, applied in order:
Percentage of wins in the tournament as a whole
The cumulative number of Game rounds required to win the games they have won in the tournament (since the last point reset, or the start of the tournament if no point reset has occurred). Note: winning in less rounds is better.
The order in which the player joined the tournament (first player to join wins)
Hope this help
Are the same tie breaker rules applied when scoreboard is based on point per win, like round 1 every win is 4 points, round 2 every win is 5 points etc? If two or more players ends with the same number of point, is first tie breaker rule who scored more wins throughout the tournament?
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users