Skoffin wrote: But he claims he has info due to his role that TELLS him about Ragian - are you suggesting that Pika is outright lying about that part? and if so why?
Truly it is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.
Also Ragian is scum.
Moderator: Community Team
Skoffin wrote: But he claims he has info due to his role that TELLS him about Ragian - are you suggesting that Pika is outright lying about that part? and if so why?
Skoffin wrote:Sometimes you just gotta not take a Skoffin seriously.
dakky21 wrote:Skoffin wrote:Sometimes you just gotta not take a Skoffin seriously.
Or sometimes you are a good townie and sometimes a bad scum?
I'm still on Rage because Pika believes he is scum, and as I said, making scum unlynchable is a bastard setup which doesn't makes any sense so he must be the king and therefore I think I am right on this one. If the whole Pika stuff on Rage is still a joke then we need to hear more from Pika, but I doubt that will happen. Anyhow.. continue.
dakky21 wrote:Skoffin wrote:Sometimes you just gotta not take a Skoffin seriously.
Or sometimes you are a good townie and sometimes a bad scum?
dakky21 wrote:Is it possible that my theory is correct and that Pika is the King and maybe he has a cop role which he doesn't want to reveal and he checked Rage last night and knows Rage is the scum? If it's possible, then the first Skoff hammer of claimed unlynchable Pika and now a second attempt by voting the unlynchable is HIGHLY ridiculous, it seems like Skoff doesn't care what will happen.
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Ragian wrote:You can't vote today? That explains the vote count.
BuJaber wrote:3. All votes and unvotes must be in bold to be counted. You can type in any color you want but for everyone's sake - pick one that's easy to read and easy on the eyes please. If you want to change your vote you must unvote first. This is just to make your intentions clear.
Skoffin wrote:Ragian wrote:Mandy probably put his blinders on. It happens. Tell me about mitch, woman! You can do it in a fight if you so wish.
I've been so tired and overworked that I forgot the differences between this game and Cyoc wololol. I have valid reasons, I just don't remember exactly what they were.
His overall demeanour screams scum; he gets both defensive and aggressive, gets cranky, seems slightly more determined than what he is doing when town etc.
Mitch is still scum. Vote mitch
Skoffin wrote: I voted in bold earlier in the day and that wasn't counted either.Skoffin wrote:Ragian wrote:Mandy probably put his blinders on. It happens. Tell me about mitch, woman! You can do it in a fight if you so wish.
I've been so tired and overworked that I forgot the differences between this game and Cyoc wololol. I have valid reasons, I just don't remember exactly what they were.
His overall demeanour screams scum; he gets both defensive and aggressive, gets cranky, seems slightly more determined than what he is doing when town etc.
Mitch is still scum. Vote mitch
BuJaber wrote:11. Under very specific situations where it becomes apparent to me that the game is broken in some way I may choose to make changes to someone's role, or influence the game in some way.
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users