The State of the Uniom

[warmonger1981]

they should disband the racist group black caucus,they serve no purpose but spread hater,bunch of fucking racist pigs

Oh please tell me more of your opinions like this.

I don't know if you want to start that.

[Neoteny]

they should disband the racist group black caucus,they serve no purpose but spread hater,bunch of fucking racist pigs

Oh please tell me more of your opinions like this.

I don't know if you want to start that.

I absolutely do. Karel, how do you feel about Al Sharpton?

[warmonger1981]

This Kennedy dude is a f****** douchebag. Super fake emotions and nothing but a Debbie Downer. One guy talks about nothing but good s*** for the most part, another guy talks about nothing but all the bad s***.

[Neoteny]

I'm pretty sure that's how this works. The guy in charge gives his spin. The next guy says oh hey whattabout all this shit.

[Neoteny]

Healthcare is fucked. Taxes are fucked. Middle east is fucked. Poor people are fucked. People of color are fucked.

This is all true.

[karel]

they should disband the racist group black caucus,they serve no purpose but spread hater,bunch of fucking racist pigs

Oh please tell me more of your opinions like this.

I don't know if you want to start that.

I absolutely do. Karel, how do you feel about Al Sharpton?

really you have to bring his name up,he has done nothing for blacks just like the black cacus,both are a f-en joke,al is no rev or civil right guy,only a fruader

[HitRed]

Healthcare is fucked. Taxes are fucked. Middle east is fucked. Poor people are fucked. People of color are fucked.

This is all true.

Trump is Great!

This ad is paid for by Russian Bankers for Trump also known as Vodka for Breakfast Team.

[Dukasaur]

Reagan had 600 ship navy. Under 300 today.

How many ships do you really think you need to go around bullying third-world countries that are 25 or 50 years behind in technology?

[HitRed]

Reagan had 600 ship navy. Under 300 today.

How many ships do you really think you need to go around bullying third-world countries that are 25 or 50 years behind in technology?

List the countries please.

[warmonger1981]

Reagan had 600 ship navy. Under 300 today.

How many ships do you really think you need to go around bullying third-world countries that are 25 or 50 years behind in technology?

You have to remember that anything that happens around the world is a threat to us sovereignty. America likes to cover its bases.

[DoomYoshi]

[Bernie Sanders]

they should disband the racist group black caucus,they serve no purpose but spread hater,bunch of fucking racist pigs

Oh please tell me more of your opinions like this.

I don't know if you want to start that.

I absolutely do. Karel, how do you feel about Al Sharpton?

really you have to bring his name up,he has done nothing for blacks just like the black cacus,both are a f-en joke,al is no rev or civil right guy,only a fruader

Fukn negroes!

Let the white people lead the negroes! We know better.....right on karel!

[Dukasaur]

Reagan had 600 ship navy. Under 300 today.

How many ships do you really think you need to go around bullying third-world countries that are 25 or 50 years behind in technology?

List the countries please.

How should I know your list of targets? Am I a mind-reader? What countries are you planning to invade this year? You've obviously got some choice victims in mind if a 380-ship-and-3700-aircraft navy isn't big enough to do the job.

I know that destabilizing Libya was a cakewalk, and so far you seem to have lots of help reducing Syria to rubble. Who will your next victim be? Quatar? Has a dozen Mirage 2000 aircraft. Yeah, a dozen. Seven torpedo boats. Yeah, seven. So, yeah, 300 ships including 10 attack carriers and 9 other carriers, should be easy-peasy to knock out the Emir's pathetic resistance.

So, a lot depends on who you want to bomb into the stone age next. Are you tired of Arabs, want to go further afield? Madagascar? Has one Chamoix-Class torpedo boat, and six patrol boats. I think you could send over the Chicago Marine Police unit to deal with that one. Uruguay? Okay, that one does have a helicopter carrier and two frigates -- you may have to dispatch an attack carrier for that massive fleet. Should only be on deployment for as long as it takes to get there and back; I don't think the actual battle will take more than an hour. Actually, don't waste a carrier: a Virginia-class attack sub should be enough.

But ultimately it's your choice. So tell me, what nation are you planning to blow up next that you think 380 ships and 3700 aircraft won't be enough to do the job?

[Neoteny]

I mean, they want Iran and Russia. Maybe North Korea? Despite the fact that the majority of our military training is not in direct force on force activity anymore, and that, even if it were, that naval tactics have changed since the cold war. For comparison, the Russians and Chinese, probably the only countries capable of the mustering strength we have, are running similar size navies, but only have one or two carriers. So even in a similar numbers calculation, we are still capable of bringing greater force to the seas.

Hard to cram that into a Reagan-sucking one-liner though.

[HitRed]

Reagan had 600 ship navy. Under 300 today.

How many ships do you really think you need to go around bullying third-world countries that are 25 or 50 years behind in technology?

List the countries please.

How should I know your list of targets? What countries are you planning to invade this year? You've obviously got some choice victims in mind if a 380-ship-and-3700-aircraft navy isn't big enough to do the job.

I know that destabilizing Libya was a cakewalk, and so far you seem to have lots of help reducing Syria to rubble. Who will your next victim be? Quatar? Has a dozen Mirage 2000 aircraft. Yeah, a dozen. Seven torpedo boats. Yeah, seven. So, yeah, 300 ships including 10 attack carriers and 9 other carriers, should be easy-peasy to knock out the Emir's pathetic resistance.

So, a lot depends on who you want to bomb into the stone age next. Are you tired of Arabs, want to go further afield? Madagascar? Has one Chamoix-Class torpedo boat, and six patrol boats. I think you could send over the Chicago Marine Police unit to deal with that one. Uruguay? Okay, that one does have a helicopter carrier and two frigates -- you may have to dispatch an attack carrier for that massive fleet. Should only be on deployment for as long as it takes to get there and back; I don't think the actual battle will take more than an hour. Actually, don't waste a carrier: a Virginia-class attack sub should be enough.

But ultimately it's your choice. So tell me, what nation are you planning to blow up next that you think 380 ships and 3700 aircraft won't be enough to do the job?

Your defending Gaddafi and blaming it on Obama? I love it! The United Nations Resolution 1973 called on the nations of the would to protected the citizens of Lybia from being killed by their own leader. Hmmm, looks like Canada voted for it and leader of the NATO forces in Libya was ....(wait for it)...Charles Bouchard a Canadian Air Force General.

[Dukasaur]

Reagan had 600 ship navy. Under 300 today.

How many ships do you really think you need to go around bullying third-world countries that are 25 or 50 years behind in technology?

List the countries please.

How should I know your list of targets? What countries are you planning to invade this year? You've obviously got some choice victims in mind if a 380-ship-and-3700-aircraft navy isn't big enough to do the job.

I know that destabilizing Libya was a cakewalk, and so far you seem to have lots of help reducing Syria to rubble. Who will your next victim be? Quatar? Has a dozen Mirage 2000 aircraft. Yeah, a dozen. Seven torpedo boats. Yeah, seven. So, yeah, 300 ships including 10 attack carriers and 9 other carriers, should be easy-peasy to knock out the Emir's pathetic resistance.

So, a lot depends on who you want to bomb into the stone age next. Are you tired of Arabs, want to go further afield? Madagascar? Has one Chamoix-Class torpedo boat, and six patrol boats. I think you could send over the Chicago Marine Police unit to deal with that one. Uruguay? Okay, that one does have a helicopter carrier and two frigates -- you may have to dispatch an attack carrier for that massive fleet. Should only be on deployment for as long as it takes to get there and back; I don't think the actual battle will take more than an hour. Actually, don't waste a carrier: a Virginia-class attack sub should be enough.

But ultimately it's your choice. So tell me, what nation are you planning to blow up next that you think 380 ships and 3700 aircraft won't be enough to do the job?

Your defending Gaddafi and blaming it on Obama? I love it! Resolution 1973 called on the nations of the would to protected the citizens of Lybia from being killed by their own leader. Hmmm, looks like Canada voted for it and leader of the NATO forces was ....(wait for it)...Charles Bouchard a Canadian Air Force General.

That wasn't the question. The question is: who are you planning to blow up next, that you think 380 ships and 3700 aircraft won't be enough to do the job?

[HitRed]

Reagan had 600 ship navy. Under 300 today.

How many ships do you really think you need to go around bullying third-world countries that are 25 or 50 years behind in technology?

List the countries please.

How should I know your list of targets? What countries are you planning to invade this year? You've obviously got some choice victims in mind if a 380-ship-and-3700-aircraft navy isn't big enough to do the job.

I know that destabilizing Libya was a cakewalk, and so far you seem to have lots of help reducing Syria to rubble. Who will your next victim be? Quatar? Has a dozen Mirage 2000 aircraft. Yeah, a dozen. Seven torpedo boats. Yeah, seven. So, yeah, 300 ships including 10 attack carriers and 9 other carriers, should be easy-peasy to knock out the Emir's pathetic resistance.

So, a lot depends on who you want to bomb into the stone age next. Are you tired of Arabs, want to go further afield? Madagascar? Has one Chamoix-Class torpedo boat, and six patrol boats. I think you could send over the Chicago Marine Police unit to deal with that one. Uruguay? Okay, that one does have a helicopter carrier and two frigates -- you may have to dispatch an attack carrier for that massive fleet. Should only be on deployment for as long as it takes to get there and back; I don't think the actual battle will take more than an hour. Actually, don't waste a carrier: a Virginia-class attack sub should be enough.

But ultimately it's your choice. So tell me, what nation are you planning to blow up next that you think 380 ships and 3700 aircraft won't be enough to do the job?

Your defending Gaddafi and blaming it on Obama? I love it! Resolution 1973 called on the nations of the would to protected the citizens of Lybia from being killed by their own leader. Hmmm, looks like Canada voted for it and leader of the NATO forces was ....(wait for it)...Charles Bouchard a Canadian Air Force General.

That wasn't the question. The question is: who are you planning to blow up next, that you think 380 ships and 3700 aircraft won't be enough to do the job?

I think we should ask which country Canada is going to attack next. Warmongers.

[Dukasaur]

Reagan had 600 ship navy. Under 300 today.

{...}

How should I know your list of targets? What countries are you planning to invade this year? You've obviously got some choice victims in mind if a 380-ship-and-3700-aircraft navy isn't big enough to do the job.

I know that destabilizing Libya was a cakewalk, and so far you seem to have lots of help reducing Syria to rubble. Who will your next victim be? Quatar? Has a dozen Mirage 2000 aircraft. Yeah, a dozen. Seven torpedo boats. Yeah, seven. So, yeah, 300 ships including 10 attack carriers and 9 other carriers, should be easy-peasy to knock out the Emir's pathetic resistance.

So, a lot depends on who you want to bomb into the stone age next. Are you tired of Arabs, want to go further afield? Madagascar? Has one Chamoix-Class torpedo boat, and six patrol boats. I think you could send over the Chicago Marine Police unit to deal with that one. Uruguay? Okay, that one does have a helicopter carrier and two frigates -- you may have to dispatch an attack carrier for that massive fleet. Should only be on deployment for as long as it takes to get there and back; I don't think the actual battle will take more than an hour. Actually, don't waste a carrier: a Virginia-class attack sub should be enough.

But ultimately it's your choice. So tell me, what nation are you planning to blow up next that you think 380 ships and 3700 aircraft won't be enough to do the job?

Your defending Gaddafi and blaming it on Obama? I love it! Resolution 1973 called on the nations of the would to protected the citizens of Lybia from being killed by their own leader. Hmmm, looks like Canada voted for it and leader of the NATO forces was ....(wait for it)...Charles Bouchard a Canadian Air Force General.

That wasn't the question. The question is: who are you planning to blow up next, that you think 380 ships and 3700 aircraft won't be enough to do the job?

I think we should ask which country Canada is going to attack next. Warmongers.

I don't think that's relevant. You're the one crying that you don't have enough ships, so the question is, who are you planning to attack next?

Canada is apparently satisfied with 12 frigates and 4 submarines, so it's probably not planning to attack anyone very big. Maybe Portugal, if they keep stealing sardines.

[HitRed]

Reagan had 600 ship navy. Under 300 today.

{...}

How should I know your list of targets? What countries are you planning to invade this year? You've obviously got some choice victims in mind if a 380-ship-and-3700-aircraft navy isn't big enough to do the job.

I know that destabilizing Libya was a cakewalk, and so far you seem to have lots of help reducing Syria to rubble. Who will your next victim be? Quatar? Has a dozen Mirage 2000 aircraft. Yeah, a dozen. Seven torpedo boats. Yeah, seven. So, yeah, 300 ships including 10 attack carriers and 9 other carriers, should be easy-peasy to knock out the Emir's pathetic resistance.

So, a lot depends on who you want to bomb into the stone age next. Are you tired of Arabs, want to go further afield? Madagascar? Has one Chamoix-Class torpedo boat, and six patrol boats. I think you could send over the Chicago Marine Police unit to deal with that one. Uruguay? Okay, that one does have a helicopter carrier and two frigates -- you may have to dispatch an attack carrier for that massive fleet. Should only be on deployment for as long as it takes to get there and back; I don't think the actual battle will take more than an hour. Actually, don't waste a carrier: a Virginia-class attack sub should be enough.

But ultimately it's your choice. So tell me, what nation are you planning to blow up next that you think 380 ships and 3700 aircraft won't be enough to do the job?

Your defending Gaddafi and blaming it on Obama? I love it! Resolution 1973 called on the nations of the would to protected the citizens of Lybia from being killed by their own leader. Hmmm, looks like Canada voted for it and leader of the NATO forces was ....(wait for it)...Charles Bouchard a Canadian Air Force General.

That wasn't the question. The question is: who are you planning to blow up next, that you think 380 ships and 3700 aircraft won't be enough to do the job?

I think we should ask which country Canada is going to attack next. Warmongers.

I don't think that's relevant. You're the one crying that you don't have enough ships, so the question is, who are you planning to attack next?

Canada is apparently satisfied with 12 frigates and 4 submarines, so it's probably not planning to attack anyone very big. Maybe Portugal, if they keep stealing sardines.

I don't remember complaining about it. Just stated a fact. Maybe we are 1/2 as likely to go to war now. Maybe our ships are twice as good. I'll I said.

[Neoteny]

Uh... It looks like he wants to attack Canada. Don't worry, Hitred, our navy could take Canada if you're that worried about our northern neighbors.

Might I suggest we just invest in our workers and build a wall up there?

[Dukasaur]

I don't remember complaining about it. Just stated a fact. Maybe we are 1/2 as likely to go to war now. Maybe our ships are twice as good. I'll I said.

Okay, fair enough.

[tkr4lf]

I say we invade Mexico, and then make the Mexicans pay for the war. That's right nietzsche, your ass is grass!

[Bernie Sanders]

I say we invade Mexico, and then make the Mexicans pay for the war. That's right nietzsche, your ass is grass!

After we attack Mexico, we'll have tens of millions of Mexican refugees to pay for, not to mention rebuilding the country.

No thanks!

[HitRed]

There is only 1 place in Mexico were you can LEGALY buy a gun. Fact. When you look at all the crime and cartels makes you wonder.