DoomYoshi wrote:Maybe I should just accept this as a bad game and scrap it. I've never seen such low interest in a game before. I thought it would be a neat mechanic to lengthen the game but it didn't turn out that way.
The issue is not the mechanic, but the player base
You skimmed my post where I wrote 3 of the smartest, you want to lynch someone
strike wolf wrote:Well not much to read up on really. Not sure what makes those three lucky. Other than that there really hasn't been any serious discussion. So screw it. We need a lynch and today was completely wasted. I'd like to give Pika time to speak but he's been quiet for almost as long as me and likely to have tomorrow as well to talk lynched or not and We're past the deadline.
<b>Vote Pika </b>
AND you failed with the vote text formatting
. Sorry but...
(underlined for emphasis)
unvote, vote strike wolf
It's a good thing you're trying to move the game along, but most of these arguments are terrible.
1- I see where you're coming from, but as you did talk about other people (me, strike and you I think) being the luckiest on D1 earlier I don't find confusing the two adjectives particularly scummy. Don't think you mentioned it on D2, but still...
2- Wasn't your vote for strike a vote to lynch too (or any vote for that matter)? Besides, he pretty clearly stated on D1 he thought we needed to lynch. Being consistent is not a sin. And if his position was an issue, why only address it now?
3- Are you going to go vote for people who mess up their quotes next? strike just used the wrong brackets, and I don't see why scum would be more likely to do that than town.FOS dakky