blacky365 wrote:I agree with dakky that a no lynch vote doesn’t help, because we will be in the same position on D2.
BuJaber wrote:Also blacky you didn't answer my question. Why is it suspicious that Tobikera knows so much about sea creatures?
Truth is it isn’t... but it’s D1 and I pointed half a finger half heartedly and just for the (unfunny?) bants!
Sorry I must have missed ure Q earlier.
vote RagianSimply for being the hammer that just lynched me in DBD

Humm...is that a fifth "joke vote" on me? It's starting to get serious. Which is fair. However, passing it off as a joke doesn't really fly when we get so close to claiming territory. IGMEOY, blacky.
chapcrap wrote:Ragian wrote:You should've defo joined DBD for mafia!
How are you on claims?
Obviously!
I don't understand the question.
Wanted to know your position on getting claims D1 now that you didn't want a lynch D1. But then you changed your beliefs :shrug:
Uhh...jmf joins the bandwagon. Here's hoping that I'm not the only one taking notes.
Metsfanmax wrote:Ragian wrote:However, in a game with no VT (vanilla town - roles with no night actions), we might be better off going to night time without lynching anyone.
I don't agree with this reasoning because even in a game with VT, there's still a substantial risk of lynching a town power role when you mislynch. That's just one of the things we all accept as a possible risk of a D1 lynch. I think in this game it's not substantially different. Even though we will be guaranteed to lynch someone who has some sort of role, we have to assume that the chance that it's an
important role (cop, doc, etc.) is approximately the same as in other games. And in that case the reasoning for a D1 lynch still holds.
I have underlined a very important modal verb. I think it's weird that you completely ignored where I said that I'm for a D1 lynch. The stuff that you just took out of context was an admission that
if I were to agree to a no lynch, it would have to be in a non-VT game. You're being very selective with what you pound on me for.
Also, I'd like to clarify that I'm decent at best. I'm not a good player. I get lucky sometimes, though
Ugh...then jmf soft-claimed. He's fairly new to the game, so don't go all "CC Mafia Forum" on him. It doesn't help anything. I haven't seen him soft-claim in any of our other games as far as I remember. Anyway,
a protective role could be loads of roles, so thinking that the doc has been outed is jumping to conclusions. However, him jumping on my bandwagon and then soft-claiming doesn't look good. What's going on, jmf?
@TX, you have to decide for yourself by reading the arguments for and against a D1 lynch:
- For: We start establishing voting patterns and players' reasonings, we learn something about the setup through the role. If we don't lynch, we know little more D2 than we knew D2 (this is my stance).
- Against: Presumably, we have a lot of town power roles that can investigate, etc. during N1 and yield productive results for us to use D2. We don't lynch any town roles (which is most likely D1).