TX AG 90 wrote:Chap didn't really do much to earn my Vote on D1. I just thought everyone was supposed to vote and based on what little or no information, I went with him. I'm still not convinced he is town, but I put it at over 50% and am ok with the plan. I said as much initially. Either it's a solid plan by a town member to narrow the lynching candidates down into a manageable pool or a masterful invention by scum to get the rest of us to lynch more townies. Since several in Group B were at the tops of my scum list anyway, I sided with - good plan for town going forward.
You realize he could just have made up this ability of bussing 4 people and knowing how many scum are in there right? I don't see how that would make it a masterful lie.
Tobikera wrote:Disagree, if pika or ZB are voted and found to be scum, then we can roll up most of the scum more easily. I was never a top lynch choice, except among the scum. Blacky, SW, Ragian, TX, chaps, and, of course, me have said at one time or another that it's not time to lynch Tobi. So, who are the 6 dumbshits that want to lynch a 6th townie?? Figured mafia would have night-killed me before this, but maybe a Master Misdirector is not high on their list of candidates. Scum know I am town, so look for the ones who are posting most often + mentioning the need to lynch Tobi. There you go....scum on a platter.
Go on then, who would you town/scum read if I or pika flip scum and why? Also stop acting like you're some sort of pro-town hero and everyone should know it.
Skoffin wrote:Tobis alignment will tell us about other players while others players lynch would not. If tobi is town then ragoo is scum and chap is town. If tobi is scum then chap is his scum partner. Tobi is best lynch today.
I can buy chap being scum if tobi is scum for diverting votes away from tobi, I don't see why tobi being town would mean chap is town though.
Tobikera wrote:Ragian wrote:Of course, scum hunting is going like crap because we have a million pages of speculation that any scum can hide behind. ......Some townies have polluted this thread playing into scum hands that now no one knows anything.
You make the point I have tried to make before. I have from D2, been upfront about what I did. It was confirmed by a townie (Mets) and someone I consider, at this juncture, scum (Pika). I have said when I have been successful and when have not. Now, on D4, ZB comes along and paints a picture which I think is a composite of things he gathered from all the things I and others have said on D2 and D3. I swear he's making it up, and calling me a liar in hopes that unperceiving townies will vote to lynch. Everything I've done checks out. Can ZB say the same. His confirmations are only his own words and his aspersions on me. Where's his proof? Nowhere. He's creating a legend synthesized from everyone else's words. SWANNY!!!
You still haven't answered how disclosing an ability the targets are aware of should give you town cred. Also I would think by speculation Rage means stuff like talks about what the flavour means (wonder who did that) and the "theories" SK used to put forward.
Ragian wrote:Right. I see what you're saying. But at this point in the game, it's not unnatural for scum to work together. So, let me get this straight. The only thing I get from you is that BuJ and Pika are in cahoots together. BuJ says he didn't land on his target, and Pika corroborates that. Do we know what "message" doesn't fik Mets and who stated it first if any? I don't trust Pika, you see.
No we don't know what the actual action result is. But if BuJ and Pika are lying about being redirected and TX is lying about not being so they could frame tobi, you'd think they'd be faster to vote him (atm only pika is)