Moderator: Tournament Directors
swimmerdude99 wrote:We will need a replacement for leverpuller on Japans team. He seems to have left the site!
swimmerdude99 wrote:We will need a replacement for leverpuller on Japans team. He seems to have left the site!
Each team should be composed of a minimum of 8 players and a maximum of 12.
josko.ri wrote:Is this limitatiom using of minimum 8 players per a round or per tournament? Japan had 5 players left the site and is currently at 7 players so if limitation of minimum 8 players is per tournament then we have satisfied it but if it is per a round then we need to recruit 8th player for round 17 and for the playoffs.
niMic wrote:Feels like this tournament has lasted my entire life.
The Semi-Finals and finals will also have a 7th game. Trips, no spoils, chained, fog in order to avoid ties.
_Untouchable wrote:Hi Groovy,
Can you confirm the score system still apply for the semi finals and finals:
- Win a Doubles: 1 pt
- Win a Triples: 2 pts
- Win a Quads: 3 pts
And that the additional trips only acts as a tie breaker (=1 pt)?
(because if it's 2 pts, a tie is still possible )
Thanks!
mc05025 wrote:games are all finished...
rockfist wrote:For those of us who medal hunt...this tournament is not in any way worth the effort. Its hard to maintain interest this long. Kudos to those who have, but yeah...
Chariot of Fire wrote:Gotta fancy France to take this - they've been amazing all series. Have a great final all who are competing.
GoranZ wrote:rockfist wrote:For those of us who medal hunt...this tournament is not in any way worth the effort. Its hard to maintain interest this long. Kudos to those who have, but yeah...
Yeah the tournament was too long.Chariot of Fire wrote:Gotta fancy France to take this - they've been amazing all series. Have a great final all who are competing.
Nope its not the French
Chariot of Fire wrote:GoranZ wrote:rockfist wrote:For those of us who medal hunt...this tournament is not in any way worth the effort. Its hard to maintain interest this long. Kudos to those who have, but yeah...
Yeah the tournament was too long.
A tournament worth its salt to crown the best in a 'World Cup of Risk' can neither be brief nor easy. You do a great disservice to those who worked so hard to see it to the finish (to groovy...eternal respect).
Chariot of Fire wrote:If there was a flaw it was in France not winning. To have been the outstanding team throughout all those rounds - and by a considerable margin - only to lose out in a playoff system to a team that fared no better than 2nd-4th in the season...well that's unfair in my book.
Vive la France!
GoranZ wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:GoranZ wrote:rockfist wrote:For those of us who medal hunt...this tournament is not in any way worth the effort. Its hard to maintain interest this long. Kudos to those who have, but yeah...
Yeah the tournament was too long.
A tournament worth its salt to crown the best in a 'World Cup of Risk' can neither be brief nor easy. You do a great disservice to those who worked so hard to see it to the finish (to groovy...eternal respect).
I do a great disservice by agreeing to your clan-mate that the tournament was too long? Is this a jokeChariot of Fire wrote:If there was a flaw it was in France not winning. To have been the outstanding team throughout all those rounds - and by a considerable margin - only to lose out in a playoff system to a team that fared no better than 2nd-4th in the season...well that's unfair in my book.
Vive la France!
Playoff system is part of every World Cup. If you watch football you surely know that. So claiming that its unfair shows how little you know about Football. Maybe Cricket is better suited for you
Users browsing this forum: No registered users