Battle For Australia [Quenched]

by **cairnswk** on Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:01 am

Gilligan wrote:So is this going to be "WWII: Australia" in Start a game, join, etc.?

Yup!

by **DoomHero** on Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:02 pm

Wisse wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
Wisse wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
5 Quenches!!!

the 6th one is coming

China?

yup

Looks great.

Yah but, when are they going to be playable? :?:

by **DoomHero** on Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:03 pm

sorry

came out wrong. im new to posting, hehehehe :oops:

by **Ruben Cassar** on Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:26 am

Well done! Great job cairns.

by **cairnswk** on Sun Jun 17, 2007 12:56 pm

Ruben Cassar wrote:Well done! Great job cairns.

Thanks Ruben...I hope everyone enjoys it.

by **peteeson10** on Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:20 pm

its a good map. it has alot of potential. idont think there should be so many area bonuses. :wink:

by **cairnswk** on Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 am

peteeson10 wrote:its a good map. it has alot of potential. idont think there should be so many area bonuses.

Thanks peteeson for your suggestion.
The map is now quenched, and up for play.
If there is enough call by other to alter the bnouses, then it may occur, but the bonuses have been worked out by a well-tried formulae.

Hope you enjoy playing the map.

by **lackattack** on Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:52 pm

Hey cairnswk,

I took too long to install this map and now the XML file is gone. Sorry! Could you re-upload it or send to info@conquerclub.com?

Thanks

by **cairnswk** on Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:34 am

lackattack wrote:Hey cairnswk,

I took too long to install this map and now the XML file is gone. Sorry! Could you re-upload it or send to info@conquerclub.com?

Thanks

Lackattack...no worries....posted below!

http://www.sendspace.com/file/x8laqx

by **unriggable** on Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:01 pm

Hip hip hooray!

by **Coleman** on Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:05 pm

Does this still have the always neutral territories?

by **dominationnation** on Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:06 pm

game play is asowme!!

by **Nc_Hunt3r** on Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:07 pm

The Bismarks says 4 but gives 6 is this a bug?

by **cairnswk** on Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:09 am

Nc_Hunt3r wrote:The Bismarks says 4 but gives 6 is this a bug?

yes Nc_Hunt3r...you got lucky this round....a fix has been sent to lackattack. Thanks for your post.

by **cairnswk** on Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:11 am

Coleman wrote:Does this still have the always neutral territories?

yes coleman...those neutrals are fixed...for now!

by **cairnswk** on Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:13 am

dominationnation wrote:game play is asowme!!

WOW dominationnation...that's excellent feedback so soon.

by **Forza AZ** on Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:59 am

Nice map, and I checked the XML. No mistakes I found, so the map can really be played as it should be now.

by **Nc_Hunt3r** on Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:14 am

cairnswk wrote:
Nc_Hunt3r wrote:The Bismarks says 4 but gives 6 is this a bug?
yes Nc_Hunt3r...you got lucky this round....a fix has been sent to lackattack. Thanks for your post.

lol I didnt get lucky I was on the bad end of someone with bismarcks hehe. Great map though looks good.. Thanks for your hard work

by **cairnswk** on Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:50 am

Forza AZ wrote:Nice map, and I checked the XML. No mistakes I found, so the map can really be played as it should be now.

Thanks Forza AZ. Appreciate you checking.

by **cairnswk** on Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:52 am

Nc_Hunt3r wrote:
cairnswk wrote:
Nc_Hunt3r wrote:The Bismarks says 4 but gives 6 is this a bug?
yes Nc_Hunt3r...you got lucky this round....a fix has been sent to lackattack. Thanks for your post.

lol I didnt get lucky I was on the bad end of someone with bismarcks hehe. Great map though looks good.. Thanks for your hard work

Oh I'm sorry :cry:

Mmmmm I don't know....maybe it'll all come out in the wash!

you know Karma!

by **Night Strike** on Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:30 pm

I like the map, but having all the neutrals in the middle could give someone a distinct advantage. Was it a fluke that our game has neutrals in just the middle band of territories? (548042) If there's going to be neutrals, they should be mixed up.

by **cairnswk** on Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:51 pm

Night Strike wrote:I like the map, but having all the neutrals in the middle could give someone a distinct advantage. Was it a fluke that our game has neutrals in just the middle band of territories? (548042) If there's going to be neutrals, they should be mixed up.

Thanks Night Strike for your comments...those neutrals in the middle are deliberate...this whole concept is meant to represent the attack from the north by the Japanese and the holding of the south by the Allies...the neutrals in the middle are territories that were conquered by both side in order to destroy the Japanese advance on Australia. Regardless of this fact, if you play the map like a normal map, there are definite chalenges in there to overcome, and eveyone can still enjoy it.