

Moderator: Community Team
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
KoolBak wrote:DoD....aren't there a lot of people / groups that just enjoy the collapse of society? Those that trash transfer stations, etc?
I don't personally believe it. Just throwing some info out that folks don't typically know about banks and how they function at a VERY slim margin. And fodder for the curmudgeons that constantly harp at each other here and grasp at the slightest straw for dirty laundry
But who is actually responsible?
Depositors, who failed to insure their cash properly, and then panicked and pulled their money out of Silicon Valley Bank before taking a breath?
The bank's management, for not effectively managing their bond portfolio and churning it as interest rates rose?
The Federal Reserve, for hiking interest rates and devaluing so many banks' investments, or for being too lax in preventing banks from taking on risk?
Federal and state regulators, for not keeping a closer eye on banks' investments and anticipating the effects of a fast-rising interest rate environment on the financial system?
Congress, for watering down the Dodd Frank bill, and allowing banks to have cash cushions that clearly aren't cushiony enough to deal with a sharp downturn?
Donald Trump for signing into law a rollback of certain regulations in Dodd Frank?
Bill Clinton for signing the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act of 1933?
The banking lobby, for pushing for less regulation and lighter capital buffers?
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Governor Gavin Newsom today issued the following statement in response to the appointment of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver of Silicon Valley Bank.
“Over the last 48 hours, I have been in touch with the highest levels of leadership at the White House and Treasury. Everyone is working with FDIC to stabilize the situation as quickly as possible, to protect jobs, people’s livelihoods, and the entire innovation ecosystem that has served as a tent pole for our economy.”
https://www.gov.ca.gov/2023/03/11/gover ... lley-bank/
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
But there's plenty of blame to go around.
Maxleod wrote:What about that swiss bank going bankrupt too? Is it really in motion?
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
HitRed wrote:We have returned to QE
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
HitRed wrote:I talked to an economist an he believes that high inflation is good for the national dept. said something like under Carter the National debt went down. The government paid off debt with devalued currency.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:HitRed wrote:I talked to an economist an he believes that high inflation is good for the national dept. said something like under Carter the National debt went down. The government paid off debt with devalued currency.
Yeah it's a double edged sword. Inflation will reduce the real value of gov't debt , but make future borrowing more expensive.
Dukasaur wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:HitRed wrote:I talked to an economist an he believes that high inflation is good for the national dept. said something like under Carter the National debt went down. The government paid off debt with devalued currency.
Yeah it's a double edged sword. Inflation will reduce the real value of gov't debt , but make future borrowing more expensive.
Inflating away the debt was a winning formula for Queen Victoria.
It's not as effective if you're not the Queen. The further downstream your income is from the mint, the less enjoyable is a high-inflation regime.
Dukasaur wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:HitRed wrote:I talked to an economist an he believes that high inflation is good for the national dept. said something like under Carter the National debt went down. The government paid off debt with devalued currency.
Yeah it's a double edged sword. Inflation will reduce the real value of gov't debt , but make future borrowing more expensive.
Inflating away the debt was a winning formula for Queen Victoria.
It's not as effective if you're not the Queen. The further downstream your income is from the mint, the less enjoyable is a high-inflation regime.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:Dukasaur wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:HitRed wrote:I talked to an economist an he believes that high inflation is good for the national dept. said something like under Carter the National debt went down. The government paid off debt with devalued currency.
Yeah it's a double edged sword. Inflation will reduce the real value of gov't debt , but make future borrowing more expensive.
Inflating away the debt was a winning formula for Queen Victoria.
It's not as effective if you're not the Queen. The further downstream your income is from the mint, the less enjoyable is a high-inflation regime.
Yeah for average citizen there is no upside, unless you start getting paid more and have a mountain of low interest debt you locked in at pre/early covid rates then it's marginally better but for most it's bad lol
jimboston wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:Dukasaur wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:HitRed wrote:I talked to an economist an he believes that high inflation is good for the national dept. said something like under Carter the National debt went down. The government paid off debt with devalued currency.
Yeah it's a double edged sword. Inflation will reduce the real value of gov't debt , but make future borrowing more expensive.
Inflating away the debt was a winning formula for Queen Victoria.
It's not as effective if you're not the Queen. The further downstream your income is from the mint, the less enjoyable is a high-inflation regime.
Yeah for average citizen there is no upside, unless you start getting paid more and have a mountain of low interest debt you locked in at pre/early covid rates then it's marginally better but for most it's bad lol
Over time salaries will increase… hopefully…
The “mountain” of debt doesn’t have to be low interest…it just has to be debt that doesn’t have an interest rate that increases as the Fed Rate increases… any fixed rate debt will benefit relative to the economy.
So a new homeowner with a fixed-rate mortgage will benefit… or a recent graduate with significant college debt will benefit.
Even people with large Credit Card debt may benefit a few years hence… as the relative cost/value of that debt goes down in relation to the economy and the value of the dollar.
This is all assuming the job market doesn’t completely tank and/or the recession is fairly short lived.
We are obviously hitting a recessionary bump… and anyone who loses their job and remains unemployed; or anyone who takes new/more debt won’t benefit.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:jimboston wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:Dukasaur wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:HitRed wrote:I talked to an economist an he believes that high inflation is good for the national dept. said something like under Carter the National debt went down. The government paid off debt with devalued currency.
Yeah it's a double edged sword. Inflation will reduce the real value of gov't debt , but make future borrowing more expensive.
Inflating away the debt was a winning formula for Queen Victoria.
It's not as effective if you're not the Queen. The further downstream your income is from the mint, the less enjoyable is a high-inflation regime.
Yeah for average citizen there is no upside, unless you start getting paid more and have a mountain of low interest debt you locked in at pre/early covid rates then it's marginally better but for most it's bad lol
Over time salaries will increase… hopefully…
The “mountain” of debt doesn’t have to be low interest…it just has to be debt that doesn’t have an interest rate that increases as the Fed Rate increases… any fixed rate debt will benefit relative to the economy.
So a new homeowner with a fixed-rate mortgage will benefit… or a recent graduate with significant college debt will benefit.
Even people with large Credit Card debt may benefit a few years hence… as the relative cost/value of that debt goes down in relation to the economy and the value of the dollar.
This is all assuming the job market doesn’t completely tank and/or the recession is fairly short lived.
We are obviously hitting a recessionary bump… and anyone who loses their job and remains unemployed; or anyone who takes new/more debt won’t benefit.
If job market tank, inflation goes down fast. Possible but not really a strong chance of that in current setup.
Credit card debt holders with 25-29% interest rates won't benefit lol, they might sink less slowly but inflation isn't bailing them out of that situation unless we start looking like Venezuela level of inflation lol.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users