degaston wrote:Announcement:
traffic133 has asked to be replaced. I've asked gimpyThewonder, but he hasn't read my message yet. If anyone knows someone else who wants to play, have them PM me.
I've messaged IcePack.
@Rag - I'm not sure if it matters if Razor posts or not considering the deadline is around the corner.
strike wolf wrote:I actually kind of defended pix on not claiming at L2 on a joke wagon because the wagon should have never gotten that far on a joke. I'm overall still neutral to iffy on him overall at how he completely avoided doing anything in his defense and has been limited in talking about reads.
I am slightly wary about Loose as well. As I've said, it's really uncommon and usually too detrimental to mafia balance wise to have a mafia role that can't vote. Like the mafia in this game is likely 4-5 players, having a mafia member who can't vote even conditionally would take away 20% to 25% of their voting power. If we assume somewhere between 12-15 townies then one vote So for that reason It's really difficult for me to believe he is scum. That said, his insistence on asking for soft claims is odd to me and I do think he has some kind of ulterior motive there, likely one related to his inability to vote.
If experienced players seem against you, is it possibly more likely that you're arguing positions that they know don't usually work out rather than Dega made all the experienced players mafia?
That joke wagon never had any merit behind it and i strongly suspect the 5th, 6th vote to be scum related.
That being said, i can't recall any scum role with a voteless power unless it's a custom role. My theory is that it's Sidekick related.
I'm chalking up the attempts to reveal is just inexperience. He thinks he's right, we think not, not going down that rabbit hole. Tunneling 101. Not that I'm innocent of that. Lol