
Moderator: Community Team
degaston wrote:My first impression (based on running The Tick) is that Sonic was very good at picking townies to accuse, so whether he's the Thing or not, I'm inclined to do the opposite of what he says.
Your "because" does not explain why you think my logic is flawed.Extreme Ways wrote:Fyi Deg I think your logic is slightly flawed because we need to find the recruiter first and foremost, so I much prefer thinning ourselves.
And your "concern" about my logic is...?Ragian wrote:Let's just get a damn BT going, guys. This is ridiculous. I think it's nice to have Dega back posting, but I'm slightly concerned about his logic... I think we should BT him. I'm more on the fence with regard to lynching, however.
SoN!c wrote:Look we have to Lynch. Draw straws or go with gut feeling.
Traf is my gut feeling because his reaction. But we can BT him tomorrow too ofcourse. So what will it be?
degaston wrote:SoN!c wrote:Look we have to Lynch. Draw straws or go with gut feeling.
Traf is my gut feeling because his reaction. But we can BT him tomorrow too ofcourse. So what will it be?
Well fine, if you insist...
Vote Sonic
degaston wrote:I called it back on Oct. 28:degaston wrote:My first impression (based on running The Tick) is that Sonic was very good at picking townies to accuse, so whether he's the Thing or not, I'm inclined to do the opposite of what he says.Your "because" does not explain why you think my logic is flawed.Extreme Ways wrote:Fyi Deg I think your logic is slightly flawed because we need to find the recruiter first and foremost, so I much prefer thinning ourselves.
You think that the strategy you are using is what proves that you're not the Thing. So isn't that exactly the strategy you would use if you were the Thing?SoN!c wrote:If you think im The Thing then something is definetly off with your logic. I would have played a total different strategy if i was the Thing and for starters surely not being so vocal as that draws too much attention.
You said it's either Traf or me, but I was at BT-1, and you wouldn't switch your vote to me, even though your vote on Traf was going nowhere. Maybe you just didn't want to be blamed for a bad BT on me? You never did respond to my question about what your case on Traf was.SoN!c wrote:That is another reason i wanted to BT Traf. Gut feeling but also the fact that if he tested negative he could lay out the plan to move forward on D1 and take the lead on who to lynch.
I think your logic is faulty and your play is detrimental to town.SoN!c wrote:Now you got the BT and first thing you say is you wanna vote me? lmao
If it's 7v2 then you still need all but 2 to be correct, so how is that better?Extreme Ways wrote:I think the no lynch logic is flawed because:
1) in 8v2, we need 6 townies to vote for the correct BT. Only 2 townies can be wrong, and look how difficult it is to orchestrate. I prefer odd numbers.
If you think it's going to be hard to get a correct BT or lynch with 7v3, how in the world do you think it's going to be easier with 5v3?Extreme Ways wrote:2) Say we no lynch and get to 7v3 with a positive BT, lynch the dude, and he turns out to be the recruiter. First of all, getting 6 townies on the correct person to BT given that theres 3 people misdirecting is super duper hard. I think it's more likely that the recruiter is getting bussed, and we end up with a 7v2 mountaineous game where the townies who werent on the train are the first to be miscondemned.
You're laughing very hard atm?SoN!c wrote:All i know is The Thing is laughing very hard atm.
What "circles and topics" are you talking about?SoN!c wrote:Deg you missed quite a lot in your absense. You should have been here with the rest of town. You could have posted / discussed your idea's back then.. Now it's just more of the same circles and topics we already debated. You got BT for a good reason. If you were here that would not have happened we would not have wasted a BT on you.
degaston wrote:You're laughing very hard atm?SoN!c wrote:All i know is The Thing is laughing very hard atm.
What "circles and topics" are you talking about?SoN!c wrote:Deg you missed quite a lot in your absense. You should have been here with the rest of town. You could have posted / discussed your idea's back then.. Now it's just more of the same circles and topics we already debated. You got BT for a good reason. If you were here that would not have happened we would not have wasted a BT on you.
And what was the "good reason" for my BT? Since the game started, I've had a total of 4 days that I didn't post, and my longest streak was 2 days without a post. There are several other players with fewer posts and longer "absences". Swang has only posted once in November. You were just been pushing a false narrative against me.
degaston wrote:If it's 7v2 then you still need all but 2 to be correct, so how is that better?Extreme Ways wrote:I think the no lynch logic is flawed because:
1) in 8v2, we need 6 townies to vote for the correct BT. Only 2 townies can be wrong, and look how difficult it is to orchestrate. I prefer odd numbers.
Also, 8v2 means only 20% of the group is Things instead of 22.2% for 7v2.
Which also increases our chance of finding the recruiter by quite a lot. A flip will not give us as much info as in normal mafia, but it still gives us info especially later on in the game.If you think it's going to be hard to get a correct BT or lynch with 7v3, how in the world do you think it's going to be easier with 5v3?Extreme Ways wrote:2) Say we no lynch and get to 7v3 with a positive BT, lynch the dude, and he turns out to be the recruiter. First of all, getting 6 townies on the correct person to BT given that theres 3 people misdirecting is super duper hard. I think it's more likely that the recruiter is getting bussed, and we end up with a 7v2 mountaineous game where the townies who werent on the train are the first to be miscondemned.
DirtyDishSoap wrote:Note for the following GIF: Ignore the MacReady name tag.
No reaction
I don't think the idea of lynching a player today without a positive BT is correct. But in your case, I'm willing to make an exception.SoN!c wrote:And now again the same debate lynch y/n?. We had that already. And asking / bringing up subjects a new that were already debated/said/explained in previous posts..
Yes. Really:SoN!c wrote:"Pushing a false narrative against you?" Really?
SoN!c wrote:This was posted in your "absence".
SoN!c wrote:If Traf is town our win chances are higher with Traf alive because Deg was absent for so long.
SoN!c wrote:Sorry Deg but your "absence" was either a Thing strategy or you were absent for quite a while for real.. Both are bad for town.
Why did you push this narrative against me instead of one of the players who was more absent?SoN!c wrote:Deg you missed quite a lot in your absense.
degaston wrote:I don't think the idea of lynching a player today without a positive BT is correct. But in your case, I'm willing to make an exception.SoN!c wrote:And now again the same debate lynch y/n?. We had that already. And asking / bringing up subjects a new that were already debated/said/explained in previous posts..Yes. Really:SoN!c wrote:"Pushing a false narrative against you?" Really?SoN!c wrote:This was posted in your "absence".SoN!c wrote:If Traf is town our win chances are higher with Traf alive because Deg was absent for so long.SoN!c wrote:Sorry Deg but your "absence" was either a Thing strategy or you were absent for quite a while for real.. Both are bad for town.Why did you push this narrative against me instead of one of the players who was more absent?SoN!c wrote:Deg you missed quite a lot in your absense.
I would agree that it will be very difficult if we get to day 3 and it's 5v3. So why wouldn't it be better for it to be 7v3 on day 3?Extreme Ways wrote:The game is probably over by the time it gets there.
Extreme Ways wrote:I kinda like Dega's point of Sonic not hammering Dega, even if I also think a cult sonic would be relatively easy to raed.
Did you miss that I've already been BT'ed?Votanic wrote:Other than that, I mostly consider Deg and Traf to be about the same level of sus for the BT vote. ... Low levels of sus too, mostly randwagon...
That was me. And what is "sus" about it?Votanic wrote:That post where he somehow determines it is better not to lynch until Day 3!! That is so sus...
It's not.Votanic wrote:So how is thi epic amount of nonsense from Sonic helping town?
You were all alone voting for Traf for 2 days. It obviously wasn't going to happen. So if your idea was to "BT an experienced player", and I was sitting there at BT-1, why didn't you switch to me?SoN!c wrote:Because the idea was to BT an experienced player???
And with deadline coming closer the choice between experienced players was "my suspect" Traf and Ragians (you).
Votanic wrote:Also, about Dega voting to lynch Sonic...
I get that a lynch vote (especially a pre-BT lynch vote) adds some much needed drama to the proceedings, but ultimately I can't condone a lynch without a BT.
Therefore, I 'm going to walk it like I talk it.
Unvote
BT Sonic
I might just be a lone voice in the wilderness here, and I might have to change my vote again ...or just let it stand as an honestly held, but unelectable, conviction.
I humbly suggest to all players currently voting for dega, Traf, or anyone else to consider getting on my BT Sonic Bandwagon (yes, that's Bandwagon with a 'B').
SoN!c wrote:Votanic wrote:Also, about Dega voting to lynch Sonic...
I get that a lynch vote (especially a pre-BT lynch vote) adds some much needed drama to the proceedings, but ultimately I can't condone a lynch without a BT.
Therefore, I 'm going to walk it like I talk it.
Unvote
BT Sonic
I might just be a lone voice in the wilderness here, and I might have to change my vote again ...or just let it stand as an honestly held, but unelectable, conviction.
I humbly suggest to all players currently voting for dega, Traf, or anyone else to consider getting on my BT Sonic Bandwagon (yes, that's Bandwagon with a 'B').
That would be tomorrow. Only 1 BT a day.. and You better test Traf tomorrow. Ofcourse very happy to take the BT if town wants me to. I''ll even vote for myself in that case. Still you would need to lynch somebody today id say to have the best win chance.
Fp by votanic
Users browsing this forum: No registered users