Moderator: Community Team
hjelp wrote:@Well SoN!c, you did survive so it's possible that you're a SK.
There was only one kill.
halrob64 wrote:Maybe my police patrols thwarted the second attempt, my men don't spend all their time eating doughnuts chan
halrob64 wrote:to be honest Loose thats a dumb post it is senseless to bring a lynching onto yourself especially when you are someone who is town and has a role.
What I will tell you is this, you need to change your thinking and ally yourself to me and other town people.
Just look at Chanakam's post, its crazy if he is town, he is asking me to tell what I found last night. If I found out someone definitely had town role and I exposed that role it would leave them wide open and Chanakam knows that, he seems desperate for the information.
So:
1 If I found out someone had a town role and I exposed them, then I would most likely be allied to the mafia.
2 If I found someone had a town role and I am not willing to expose them it means I am an honest cop and I'm protecting them.
3 If I found out someone had a scum role then as an honest cop I would out them.
4 If I found out someone was scum then I would protect them if I was a dishonest cop
I think its pretty obvious why I am not telling what I have found out at this point, Chanakam is certainly being aggressive in trying to find out what I know, so Loose don't make the same mistake in D3 otherwise we wont have any town people left
halrob64 wrote:...
Just look at Chanakam's post, its crazy if he is town, he is asking me to tell what I found last night. If I found out someone definitely had town role and I exposed that role it would leave them wide open and Chanakam knows that, he seems desperate for the information.
...
SoN!c wrote:halrob64 wrote:Maybe my police patrols thwarted the second attempt, my men don't spend all their time eating doughnuts chan
We vote Chana? Say the word
And town: we follow Halrob!
Kingm wrote:halrob64 wrote:to be honest Loose thats a dumb post it is senseless to bring a lynching onto yourself especially when you are someone who is town and has a role.
What I will tell you is this, you need to change your thinking and ally yourself to me and other town people.
Just look at Chanakam's post, its crazy if he is town, he is asking me to tell what I found last night. If I found out someone definitely had town role and I exposed that role it would leave them wide open and Chanakam knows that, he seems desperate for the information.
So:
1 If I found out someone had a town role and I exposed them, then I would most likely be allied to the mafia.
2 If I found someone had a town role and I am not willing to expose them it means I am an honest cop and I'm protecting them.
3 If I found out someone had a scum role then as an honest cop I would out them.
4 If I found out someone was scum then I would protect them if I was a dishonest cop
I think its pretty obvious why I am not telling what I have found out at this point, Chanakam is certainly being aggressive in trying to find out what I know, so Loose don't make the same mistake in D3 otherwise we wont have any town people left
If you found a townie, yeah then you should for sure not expose them.
And I do agree with you Hal, somethings smells with Chana, hmm.
Kingm wrote:somethings smells with Chana, hmm.
Loose Canon wrote:I'm now wondering if Mafias power to compensate for the powers that town had but have now lost 3 - maybe all of - is Charle gave them safe fake claims at the beginning of the game?
That would to my way of thinking fit with the "Fun" title that Charle gave to the game.
Loose Canon wrote:What hal has said is nonsense.
Mafia know who each other are, so they already know who isn't mafia.
They will kill player or players who are not them each night anyway.
Therefore saying who he investigated and whether the result was guilty, not guilty, or no result gives mafia no information they don't have already and paints no more target on a player's back than they have already.
Halrob for spouting such nonsense should
1. Name the player he investigated
2. Tell us whether the supposed result was guilty, not guilty or no result
3. EXPLAIN WHY HE INVESTIGATED THE PLAYER HE'S CLAIMING HE INVESTIGATED
Users browsing this forum: No registered users