The Cover-up Is Exposed!

[Pack Rat]

The Justice Department is now hiding/destroying evidence of Trump's involvement of sex crimes aka Trump-Epstein Files.


https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-57 ... on-maxwell

[karel]

lmfao

[Pack Rat]

Investigation shows a real cover-up by the DOJ and FBI.




Powerful pedo in the White House is protecting himself and other powerful and billionaires who made large contributions to his campaign.

[karel]

ffs get a fcking clue

[Pack Rat]

ffs get a fcking clue

I want to thank our paid democrat plant as he keeps finding new ways of how moronic Trump supporters are! Also the superb ways he pretends to support pedophiles


Great job karel!

[karel]

you fcking frogs want trump on that list so damn bad its killing you and thats all you got, as for your party you have nothing worth talking about, bunch of fcking commies, every single dem should be fired for nothing doing their job

[Pack Rat]

Karel, Trump has been mentioned over 38,000 times in the Trump-Epstein Files. No wonder the FBI and DOJ is holding back over 2 million documents!

AI Overview
+4
As of late February 2026, following a major release of federal documents, Donald Trump's name appeared more than 38,000 times in the Epstein-related files, according to an analysis of the records by The New York Times.
Here are the key details regarding the mentions of Donald Trump in the Epstein files:
Total Mentions: A New York Times analysis identified over 5,300 individual files containing more than 38,000 references to Trump, his wife, or his properties.
Context of Mentions: The vast majority of these references are not direct communications between the two men. They largely consist of news articles, emails, and FBI, documents that mention Trump in relation to his past friendship with Epstein, his visits to Epstein's home, or mentions by associates.
Unverified Allegations: The documents include summaries of tips submitted to the FBI, some of which contain unverified accusations of sexual misconduct involving Trump.
Specific Evidence: The files include previously known information, such as passenger logs from Epstein’s planes, as well as a "bawdy" note apparently signed by Trump in a birthday book for Epstein.
Missing Records/Conflicts: Reports have emerged in February 2026 that the Department of Justice (DOJ) may have withheld or failed to release certain documents related to allegations against Trump, according to some lawmakers.
Trump's Position: Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing, stated he broke ties with Epstein in the early 2000s, and claimed that some of the files "absolve" him.
CBC
CBC
+5
Other, earlier, and less comprehensive analyses of different tranches of documents had previously reported lower numbers (such as over 1,500 in one 2025 release), but the 2026 release of 3 million documents brought the total to over 38,000.
CBC

This cover-up makes the Watergate cover-up look infantile.in comparison.

[jusplay4fun]

Karel, Trump has been mentioned over 38,000 times in the Trump-Epstein Files. No wonder the FBI and DOJ is holding back over 2 million documents!

AI Overview
+4
As of late February 2026, following a major release of federal documents, Donald Trump's name appeared more than 38,000 times in the Epstein-related files, according to an analysis of the records by The New York Times.
Here are the key details regarding the mentions of Donald Trump in the Epstein files:
Total Mentions: A New York Times analysis identified over 5,300 individual files containing more than 38,000 references to Trump, his wife, or his properties.
Context of Mentions: The vast majority of these references are not direct communications between the two men. They largely consist of news articles, emails, and FBI, documents that mention Trump in relation to his past friendship with Epstein, his visits to Epstein's home, or mentions by associates.
Unverified Allegations: The documents include summaries of tips submitted to the FBI, some of which contain unverified accusations of sexual misconduct involving Trump.
Specific Evidence: The files include previously known information, such as passenger logs from Epstein’s planes, as well as a "bawdy" note apparently signed by Trump in a birthday book for Epstein.
Missing Records/Conflicts: Reports have emerged in February 2026 that the Department of Justice (DOJ) may have withheld or failed to release certain documents related to allegations against Trump, according to some lawmakers.
Trump's Position: Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing, stated he broke ties with Epstein in the early 2000s, and claimed that some of the files "absolve" him.
CBC
CBC
+5
Other, earlier, and less comprehensive analyses of different tranches of documents had previously reported lower numbers (such as over 1,500 in one 2025 release), but the 2026 release of 3 million documents brought the total to over 38,000.
CBC

This cover-up makes the Watergate cover-up look infantile.in comparison.

1) You OBVIOUSLY have NO CLUE, Self-Loathing pack rat, of the HUGE Impact of the Watergate Scandal and its Cover-up, NOR the comlexity and Legacy of that blemish on the History of this nation.

2) What was Trump doing? Falsely accused, spoken about Epstein and Trump want to some socal events at the same time. See MORE BELOW.

3) BUT HERE are the TWO Key aspects that the puny pathetic and self-loathing pack rat TOTALLY IGNORES:

a) NONE of Epstein's victims have EVER accused Trump of wrong doing. And don't give us the crap about him PAYING OFF EVER such person. For such a HUGE conspiracy, at least ONE woman would have spoken up.

b) That The Biden AG Office under Merrick Garland did not share ONE iota of evidence that Trump did ANYTHING wrong nor ILLEGAL nor IMMORAL. PERIOD. Of course, the puny pathetic pet rat wil IGNORE these Key Facts to spread his DUNG about the MATTER of the Epstein

Self-Loathing pack rat has LOST nearly every argument he makes and barely undstand what he should do. The "refutations" offered by the Self-Loathing and SILLY pack rat = total ineptitude

and NOTE what his OWN post says:

Context of Mentions: The vast majority of these references are not direct communications between the two men. They largely consist of news articles, emails, and FBI, documents that mention Trump in relation to his past friendship with Epstein, his visits to Epstein's home, or mentions by associates.

That answers LOTS and speaks VOLUMES.

and:

Specific Evidence: The files include previously known information

As I said, there was MASSIVE duplication, as much of the "new" Epstein files come from Offices in the Manhatton Office of the DOJ. Much of that had already been released previously.

MORE:

2. FBI received allegations about Trump

One document in the newly released tranche is a summary that FBI officials appear to have compiled last summer, of more than a dozen tips received by the agency involving Trump and Epstein.

It is unclear why the investigators put together the summary, and it does not say when the tips, which include unsubstantiated claims of sexual abuse, were received. The document also does not include any corroborating evidence or indication that the tips were verified. (...)

“Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election,” the justice department statement added. “To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... -takeaways

And those are the NEW FINDING by this media outlet on February 2, 2026. SORRY pack rat, that IS ALL THEY said about Trump.

and MORE:

Mr. Trump has denied any wrongdoing in connection with Mr. Epstein. In response to a request for comment, the White House referred to a public statement from the Justice Department, which stated that Friday’s documents “may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos.” It also said that some of the documents contained false claims against Mr. Trump that were submitted to the F.B.I. before the 2020 election.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/30/us/w ... files.html

THERE is again NO THERE there, no matter how many wishes the self-loathing pack rat makes nor how many coins pack rat throws into the pool sewer.

[Pack Rat]

Here you go Justprotectingpedos!

AI Overview
+6
According to allegations in court documents and FBI files released between 2016 and 2026, the minor allegedly abused by Donald Trump was 13 years old.
CNN
CNN
+2
Here are the details regarding these allegations:
The "Jane Doe" Lawsuit (1994/2016): An anonymous woman, sometimes referred to as "Katie Johnson" in early filings, sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging she was sexually assaulted at age 13 at a 1994 party in Manhattan. The lawsuit was withdrawn in November 2016 shortly before the presidential election, with the plaintiff citing safety concerns.
2025/2026 Epstein File Releases: Newly unsealed Department of Justice (DOJ) documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, particularly those released in early 2026, include references to unverified tips and interviews with a woman who reported being forced to perform oral sex on Trump in New Jersey roughly 35 years ago when she was 13 to 14 years old

[jusplay4fun]

BUT Let's celebrate SOMETHING GOOD for the US:


and


what about the Shumer Shutdown #2??


The Guy who calls the Safe Act Jim Crow 2.0 forgets that Jim Crow 1.0 (ORIGINAL) was the SAME political party as Shumer: i.e., the SiLlY Liberal Leftist Dems. SAD.


FOR SURE...!

[jusplay4fun]

Here you go Justprotectingpedos!

[size=15 AI Overview
+6
According to allegations in court documents and FBI files released between 2016 and 2026, the minor allegedly abused by Donald Trump was 13 years old.
CNN
CNN
+2
Here are the details regarding these allegations:
The "Jane Doe" Lawsuit (1994/2016): An anonymous woman, sometimes referred to as "Katie Johnson" in early filings, sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging she was sexually assaulted at age 13 at a 1994 party in Manhattan. The lawsuit was withdrawn in November 2016 shortly before the presidential election, with the plaintiff citing safety concerns.
2025/2026 Epstein File Releases: Newly unsealed Department of Justice (DOJ) documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, particularly those released in early 2026, include references to unverified tips and interviews with a woman who reported being forced to perform oral sex on Trump in New Jersey roughly 35 years ago when she was 13 to 14 years old[/size]

This is
1) OLD NEWS, this was posted before

and
2) Key words are emphasized above by ME.

AGAIN, despite WISHFUL thinking by the resident political puny pee rat, there is STILL NO THERE THERE. GIVE it UP, pee rat; you are now batting 0 - 2,899. PATHETIC.

Llama said it well: pack rat is BAD at this, this attempt at intelligent discussion and debate. He is a PROVEN LOSER and a LIAR..!

[Pack Rat]

[Pack Rat]

Here you go Justprotectingpedos!

[size=15 AI Overview
+6
According to allegations in court documents and FBI files released between 2016 and 2026, the minor allegedly abused by Donald Trump was 13 years old.
CNN
CNN
+2
Here are the details regarding these allegations:
The "Jane Doe" Lawsuit (1994/2016): An anonymous woman, sometimes referred to as "Katie Johnson" in early filings, sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging she was sexually assaulted at age 13 at a 1994 party in Manhattan. The lawsuit was withdrawn in November 2016 shortly before the presidential election, with the plaintiff citing safety concerns.
2025/2026 Epstein File Releases: Newly unsealed Department of Justice (DOJ) documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, particularly those released in early 2026, include references to unverified tips and interviews with a woman who reported being forced to perform oral sex on Trump in New Jersey roughly 35 years ago when she was 13 to 14 years old[/size]

This is
1) OLD NEWS, this was posted before

and
2) Key words are emphasized above by ME.

AGAIN, despite WISHFUL thinking by the resident political puny pee rat, there is STILL NO THERE THERE. GIVE it UP, pee rat; you are now batting 0 - 2,899. PATHETIC.

Llama said it well: pack rat is BAD at this, this attempt at intelligent discussion and debate. He is a PROVEN LOSER and a LIAR..!

Victim which I enlarged...felt threatened by Trump.

[jusplay4fun]

We have already discussed "Katie Johnson" (a fake name) issue before, I said so, and here is the PROOF:

Re: Epstein Client List
Post by jusplay4fun » Wed Aug 06, 2025 5:04 am
https://https://www.conquerclub.com/for ... 6#p5362176

mookiemcgee wrote:
Trump could rape a 13 year old live on Fox news tomorrow and you'd be asking for more proof. You can keep defending a child rapist and convicted adult rapist all you want... we just have different understanding of what the important parts of being a christian are.
First, Another LIE (or set of lies) by Mookie.

Second, Mookie continues his ONE and ONLY LINE. Now he tries to smear my Christianity as ANOTHER distraction. This is a weak and poor tactic, Mookie. You are resorting to the LCD; I thought you were above such poor tactics.

I am not defending Trump; I am asking that you produce more evidence. Smear campaigns, innuendo, and distractions are NOT PROOF. You seem to think that producing one indictment is PROOF. I disagree.

NOTE that this is NOT proven; ONE allegation by one victim on one indictment is NOT PROOF, especially when:

1) released in 2016 (Election year, that Mookie continues to ignore);

2) it has been IGNORED for over 9 years;

3) ignored by the Media;

4) ignored by the Dems;

5) ignored by the Legal system;

6) no further PROOF of this allegation;

7) No other "proof" that Trump rapes 13 year old girls;

8 ) No proof that Trump, unlike Epstein, prefers underage girls.

9) This allegation comes from California, home of rat F*****G and other smear campaigns (that were proven to be unfounded). Where do you live, Mookie?

Did you read the indictment that I posted? Or are you ignoring THAT, too? I did READ ALL of yours and thus there was no need for me to re-read it when you posted specific parts of it.

Either produce more evidence or get off the TDS.

Mookie, like pack rat, makes an allegation with NO PROOF. pack rat starts a NEW THREAD because he has LOST the debate in the Epstein Files thread. His new thread and "new" allegation PROVES NOTHING.

Mookie, to the best of my knowledge, NEVER could offer more that this ONE file and one case THAT WAS DROPPED and IGNORED by everyone for some TEN YEARS, until NOW. NOW his PAL pack rat TRIES to make this look like a cover up. NO it is NOT.

NOTHING NEW here, move along. These are not the droids we're looking for. Move ALONG.


I think those LLL (Leftist Liberal Lunatic) Dems have played mind tricks on both Mookie and pack rat, infecting both with TDS.

And pack rat, and Mookie too, there is NO THERE THERE. SORRY to BURST your new small bubble. I will NOT encourage to try again, because ALL YOUR attempts on the entire Epstein matter are futile and impotent. Ask your hero Biden about impotence.

[mookiemcgee]

Jusplay, you won't even accept being convicted of Rape by a civil jury as 'proof' but you keep saying you live by 'logic'. There are 6 million pages connecting a pedophile to rich and powerful people all over the world, with many connections to moussad, the CIA and other intelligence services and world leaders. An extremely large number of instances of Jeffrey Epstein set these connections up with girls/boys he pimped out, some barely at pubescent age.

Your claim that there is nothing worth looking into in the 6 million pages. That there is no point trying to expose people in power who have committed unspeakable acts against children is not one I understand. This has NEVER been about just Trump, or just republicans. Your desire to point the finger at Biden shows just how partisan, narrow and biased your thinking is on this subject. It's not a 'party' issue, the PEOPLE want justice and they don't want wealth and power to live with impunity.

Also go f*ck yourself and stop being such a douchebag.