The Cover-up Is Exposed!

[Pack Rat]

The Justice Department is now hiding/destroying evidence of Trump's involvement of sex crimes aka Trump-Epstein Files.


https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-57 ... on-maxwell

[karel]

lmfao

[Pack Rat]

Investigation shows a real cover-up by the DOJ and FBI.




Powerful pedo in the White House is protecting himself and other powerful and billionaires who made large contributions to his campaign.

[karel]

ffs get a fcking clue

[Pack Rat]

ffs get a fcking clue

I want to thank our paid democrat plant as he keeps finding new ways of how moronic Trump supporters are! Also the superb ways he pretends to support pedophiles


Great job karel!

[karel]

you fcking frogs want trump on that list so damn bad its killing you and thats all you got, as for your party you have nothing worth talking about, bunch of fcking commies, every single dem should be fired for nothing doing their job

[Pack Rat]

Karel, Trump has been mentioned over 38,000 times in the Trump-Epstein Files. No wonder the FBI and DOJ is holding back over 2 million documents!

AI Overview
+4
As of late February 2026, following a major release of federal documents, Donald Trump's name appeared more than 38,000 times in the Epstein-related files, according to an analysis of the records by The New York Times.
Here are the key details regarding the mentions of Donald Trump in the Epstein files:
Total Mentions: A New York Times analysis identified over 5,300 individual files containing more than 38,000 references to Trump, his wife, or his properties.
Context of Mentions: The vast majority of these references are not direct communications between the two men. They largely consist of news articles, emails, and FBI, documents that mention Trump in relation to his past friendship with Epstein, his visits to Epstein's home, or mentions by associates.
Unverified Allegations: The documents include summaries of tips submitted to the FBI, some of which contain unverified accusations of sexual misconduct involving Trump.
Specific Evidence: The files include previously known information, such as passenger logs from Epstein’s planes, as well as a "bawdy" note apparently signed by Trump in a birthday book for Epstein.
Missing Records/Conflicts: Reports have emerged in February 2026 that the Department of Justice (DOJ) may have withheld or failed to release certain documents related to allegations against Trump, according to some lawmakers.
Trump's Position: Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing, stated he broke ties with Epstein in the early 2000s, and claimed that some of the files "absolve" him.
CBC
CBC
+5
Other, earlier, and less comprehensive analyses of different tranches of documents had previously reported lower numbers (such as over 1,500 in one 2025 release), but the 2026 release of 3 million documents brought the total to over 38,000.
CBC

This cover-up makes the Watergate cover-up look infantile.in comparison.

[jusplay4fun]

Karel, Trump has been mentioned over 38,000 times in the Trump-Epstein Files. No wonder the FBI and DOJ is holding back over 2 million documents!

AI Overview
+4
As of late February 2026, following a major release of federal documents, Donald Trump's name appeared more than 38,000 times in the Epstein-related files, according to an analysis of the records by The New York Times.
Here are the key details regarding the mentions of Donald Trump in the Epstein files:
Total Mentions: A New York Times analysis identified over 5,300 individual files containing more than 38,000 references to Trump, his wife, or his properties.
Context of Mentions: The vast majority of these references are not direct communications between the two men. They largely consist of news articles, emails, and FBI, documents that mention Trump in relation to his past friendship with Epstein, his visits to Epstein's home, or mentions by associates.
Unverified Allegations: The documents include summaries of tips submitted to the FBI, some of which contain unverified accusations of sexual misconduct involving Trump.
Specific Evidence: The files include previously known information, such as passenger logs from Epstein’s planes, as well as a "bawdy" note apparently signed by Trump in a birthday book for Epstein.
Missing Records/Conflicts: Reports have emerged in February 2026 that the Department of Justice (DOJ) may have withheld or failed to release certain documents related to allegations against Trump, according to some lawmakers.
Trump's Position: Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing, stated he broke ties with Epstein in the early 2000s, and claimed that some of the files "absolve" him.
CBC
CBC
+5
Other, earlier, and less comprehensive analyses of different tranches of documents had previously reported lower numbers (such as over 1,500 in one 2025 release), but the 2026 release of 3 million documents brought the total to over 38,000.
CBC

This cover-up makes the Watergate cover-up look infantile.in comparison.

1) You OBVIOUSLY have NO CLUE, Self-Loathing pack rat, of the HUGE Impact of the Watergate Scandal and its Cover-up, NOR the comlexity and Legacy of that blemish on the History of this nation.

2) What was Trump doing? Falsely accused, spoken about Epstein and Trump want to some socal events at the same time. See MORE BELOW.

3) BUT HERE are the TWO Key aspects that the puny pathetic and self-loathing pack rat TOTALLY IGNORES:

a) NONE of Epstein's victims have EVER accused Trump of wrong doing. And don't give us the crap about him PAYING OFF EVER such person. For such a HUGE conspiracy, at least ONE woman would have spoken up.

b) That The Biden AG Office under Merrick Garland did not share ONE iota of evidence that Trump did ANYTHING wrong nor ILLEGAL nor IMMORAL. PERIOD. Of course, the puny pathetic pet rat wil IGNORE these Key Facts to spread his DUNG about the MATTER of the Epstein

Self-Loathing pack rat has LOST nearly every argument he makes and barely undstand what he should do. The "refutations" offered by the Self-Loathing and SILLY pack rat = total ineptitude

and NOTE what his OWN post says:

Context of Mentions: The vast majority of these references are not direct communications between the two men. They largely consist of news articles, emails, and FBI, documents that mention Trump in relation to his past friendship with Epstein, his visits to Epstein's home, or mentions by associates.

That answers LOTS and speaks VOLUMES.

and:

Specific Evidence: The files include previously known information

As I said, there was MASSIVE duplication, as much of the "new" Epstein files come from Offices in the Manhatton Office of the DOJ. Much of that had already been released previously.

MORE:

2. FBI received allegations about Trump

One document in the newly released tranche is a summary that FBI officials appear to have compiled last summer, of more than a dozen tips received by the agency involving Trump and Epstein.

It is unclear why the investigators put together the summary, and it does not say when the tips, which include unsubstantiated claims of sexual abuse, were received. The document also does not include any corroborating evidence or indication that the tips were verified. (...)

“Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election,” the justice department statement added. “To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... -takeaways

And those are the NEW FINDING by this media outlet on February 2, 2026. SORRY pack rat, that IS ALL THEY said about Trump.

and MORE:

Mr. Trump has denied any wrongdoing in connection with Mr. Epstein. In response to a request for comment, the White House referred to a public statement from the Justice Department, which stated that Friday’s documents “may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos.” It also said that some of the documents contained false claims against Mr. Trump that were submitted to the F.B.I. before the 2020 election.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/30/us/w ... files.html

THERE is again NO THERE there, no matter how many wishes the self-loathing pack rat makes nor how many coins pack rat throws into the pool sewer.

[Pack Rat]

Here you go Justprotectingpedos!

AI Overview
+6
According to allegations in court documents and FBI files released between 2016 and 2026, the minor allegedly abused by Donald Trump was 13 years old.
CNN
CNN
+2
Here are the details regarding these allegations:
The "Jane Doe" Lawsuit (1994/2016): An anonymous woman, sometimes referred to as "Katie Johnson" in early filings, sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging she was sexually assaulted at age 13 at a 1994 party in Manhattan. The lawsuit was withdrawn in November 2016 shortly before the presidential election, with the plaintiff citing safety concerns.
2025/2026 Epstein File Releases: Newly unsealed Department of Justice (DOJ) documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, particularly those released in early 2026, include references to unverified tips and interviews with a woman who reported being forced to perform oral sex on Trump in New Jersey roughly 35 years ago when she was 13 to 14 years old

[jusplay4fun]

BUT Let's celebrate SOMETHING GOOD for the US:


and


what about the Shumer Shutdown #2??


The Guy who calls the Safe Act Jim Crow 2.0 forgets that Jim Crow 1.0 (ORIGINAL) was the SAME political party as Shumer: i.e., the SiLlY Liberal Leftist Dems. SAD.


FOR SURE...!

[jusplay4fun]

Here you go Justprotectingpedos!

[size=15 AI Overview
+6
According to allegations in court documents and FBI files released between 2016 and 2026, the minor allegedly abused by Donald Trump was 13 years old.
CNN
CNN
+2
Here are the details regarding these allegations:
The "Jane Doe" Lawsuit (1994/2016): An anonymous woman, sometimes referred to as "Katie Johnson" in early filings, sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging she was sexually assaulted at age 13 at a 1994 party in Manhattan. The lawsuit was withdrawn in November 2016 shortly before the presidential election, with the plaintiff citing safety concerns.
2025/2026 Epstein File Releases: Newly unsealed Department of Justice (DOJ) documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, particularly those released in early 2026, include references to unverified tips and interviews with a woman who reported being forced to perform oral sex on Trump in New Jersey roughly 35 years ago when she was 13 to 14 years old[/size]

This is
1) OLD NEWS, this was posted before

and
2) Key words are emphasized above by ME.

AGAIN, despite WISHFUL thinking by the resident political puny pee rat, there is STILL NO THERE THERE. GIVE it UP, pee rat; you are now batting 0 - 2,899. PATHETIC.

Llama said it well: pack rat is BAD at this, this attempt at intelligent discussion and debate. He is a PROVEN LOSER and a LIAR..!

[Pack Rat]

[Pack Rat]

Here you go Justprotectingpedos!

[size=15 AI Overview
+6
According to allegations in court documents and FBI files released between 2016 and 2026, the minor allegedly abused by Donald Trump was 13 years old.
CNN
CNN
+2
Here are the details regarding these allegations:
The "Jane Doe" Lawsuit (1994/2016): An anonymous woman, sometimes referred to as "Katie Johnson" in early filings, sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging she was sexually assaulted at age 13 at a 1994 party in Manhattan. The lawsuit was withdrawn in November 2016 shortly before the presidential election, with the plaintiff citing safety concerns.
2025/2026 Epstein File Releases: Newly unsealed Department of Justice (DOJ) documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, particularly those released in early 2026, include references to unverified tips and interviews with a woman who reported being forced to perform oral sex on Trump in New Jersey roughly 35 years ago when she was 13 to 14 years old[/size]

This is
1) OLD NEWS, this was posted before

and
2) Key words are emphasized above by ME.

AGAIN, despite WISHFUL thinking by the resident political puny pee rat, there is STILL NO THERE THERE. GIVE it UP, pee rat; you are now batting 0 - 2,899. PATHETIC.

Llama said it well: pack rat is BAD at this, this attempt at intelligent discussion and debate. He is a PROVEN LOSER and a LIAR..!

Victim which I enlarged...felt threatened by Trump.

[jusplay4fun]

We have already discussed "Katie Johnson" (a fake name) issue before, I said so, and here is the PROOF:

Re: Epstein Client List
Post by jusplay4fun » Wed Aug 06, 2025 5:04 am
https://https://www.conquerclub.com/for ... 6#p5362176

mookiemcgee wrote:
Trump could rape a 13 year old live on Fox news tomorrow and you'd be asking for more proof. You can keep defending a child rapist and convicted adult rapist all you want... we just have different understanding of what the important parts of being a christian are.
First, Another LIE (or set of lies) by Mookie.

Second, Mookie continues his ONE and ONLY LINE. Now he tries to smear my Christianity as ANOTHER distraction. This is a weak and poor tactic, Mookie. You are resorting to the LCD; I thought you were above such poor tactics.

I am not defending Trump; I am asking that you produce more evidence. Smear campaigns, innuendo, and distractions are NOT PROOF. You seem to think that producing one indictment is PROOF. I disagree.

NOTE that this is NOT proven; ONE allegation by one victim on one indictment is NOT PROOF, especially when:

1) released in 2016 (Election year, that Mookie continues to ignore);

2) it has been IGNORED for over 9 years;

3) ignored by the Media;

4) ignored by the Dems;

5) ignored by the Legal system;

6) no further PROOF of this allegation;

7) No other "proof" that Trump rapes 13 year old girls;

8 ) No proof that Trump, unlike Epstein, prefers underage girls.

9) This allegation comes from California, home of rat F*****G and other smear campaigns (that were proven to be unfounded). Where do you live, Mookie?

Did you read the indictment that I posted? Or are you ignoring THAT, too? I did READ ALL of yours and thus there was no need for me to re-read it when you posted specific parts of it.

Either produce more evidence or get off the TDS.

Mookie, like pack rat, makes an allegation with NO PROOF. pack rat starts a NEW THREAD because he has LOST the debate in the Epstein Files thread. His new thread and "new" allegation PROVES NOTHING.

Mookie, to the best of my knowledge, NEVER could offer more that this ONE file and one case THAT WAS DROPPED and IGNORED by everyone for some TEN YEARS, until NOW. NOW his PAL pack rat TRIES to make this look like a cover up. NO it is NOT.

NOTHING NEW here, move along. These are not the droids we're looking for. Move ALONG.


I think those LLL (Leftist Liberal Lunatic) Dems have played mind tricks on both Mookie and pack rat, infecting both with TDS.

And pack rat, and Mookie too, there is NO THERE THERE. SORRY to BURST your new small bubble. I will NOT encourage to try again, because ALL YOUR attempts on the entire Epstein matter are futile and impotent. Ask your hero Biden about impotence.

[mookiemcgee]

Jusplay, you won't even accept being convicted of Rape by a civil jury as 'proof' but you keep saying you live by 'logic'. There are 6 million pages connecting a pedophile to rich and powerful people all over the world, with many connections to moussad, the CIA and other intelligence services and world leaders. An extremely large number of instances of Jeffrey Epstein set these connections up with girls/boys he pimped out, some barely at pubescent age.

Your claim that there is nothing worth looking into in the 6 million pages. That there is no point trying to expose people in power who have committed unspeakable acts against children is not one I understand. This has NEVER been about just Trump, or just republicans. Your desire to point the finger at Biden shows just how partisan, narrow and biased your thinking is on this subject. It's not a 'party' issue, the PEOPLE want justice and they don't want wealth and power to live with impunity.

Also go f*ck yourself and stop being such a douchebag.

[jusplay4fun]

Jusplay, you won't even accept being convicted of Rape by a civil jury as 'proof' but you keep saying you live by 'logic'. There are 6 million pages connecting a pedophile to rich and powerful people all over the world, with many connections to moussad, the CIA and other intelligence services and world leaders. An extremely large number of instances of Jeffrey Epstein set these connections up with girls/boys he pimped out, some barely at pubescent age.

Your claim that there is nothing worth looking into in the 6 million pages. That there is no point trying to expose people in power who have committed unspeakable acts against children is not one I understand. This has NEVER been about just Trump, or just republicans. Your desire to point the finger at Biden shows just how partisan, narrow and biased your thinking is on this subject. It's not a 'party' issue, the PEOPLE want justice and they don't want wealth and power to live with impunity.

Also go f*ck yourself and stop being such a douchebag.

This SHOWS the extent of your TDS. Trump was NOT CONVICTED of RAPE. You misstate the FACTS; you repeat FAKE NEWS. We have already discussed this and you CONTINUE to repeat the LIE. PAHTETIC argument, and YOU KNOW IT. A civil jury cannot CONVICT anyone of rape, which is a FELONY. Do I need to educate you about the LAW, too??? PATHETIC.

You DO SUFFER from TDS, Mookie; I need NO FURTHER PROOF.

Mookie has descended to the level of the SILLY puny pathetic pack rat. Are you going to repeat the NAZI LIE, too?

And the fact the LLL Dems keep TRYING to embarass Trump also says this IS ABOUT Trump and Republicans. GET YOU head out of the sand, Mookie.

and who is TRIGGERED NOW?

Re: The Cover-up Is Exposed!
Post by mookiemcgee » Fri Feb 27, 2026 1:59 am

Also go f*ck yourself and stop being such a douchebag.

Typical LLL---Leftist Liberal Lunatic---Can't argue without throwing out an expletive and an insult, as if THAT makes your argument better??? NO WAY. THAT too proves the extent of your TDS, Mookie. Grow up. Get you head around facts and stop spreading LIES. DON'T be so PATHETIC.

and when you say:

Your claim that there is nothing worth looking into in the 6 million pages.

I did NOT say that; I said there is NO EVIDENCE that Trump committed a Crime. There is NO proof that Trump did anything ILLEGAL or even immoral. OR did you NOT bother to read that, that I posted more than once. YOUR memory and reading is selective, Mookie.

I am NOT triggered. Let me post this since you likely MISSED this post:

Re: TODAY SHOW MYSTERY...MISSING MOM....
Post by jusplay4fun » Thu Feb 26, 2026 6:23 am

Most of what you call RAGE (which is FALSE, tbf) Mookie, is when I respond to the LIES of pack rat. I also call out ConfedSS for his incorrect post of things that are simply NOT TRUE. pack rat has two messages: Epstein files and attempts to embarrass Trump. He does so with insults, ad hominen attacks, a lack of FACTS, and with FAKE NEWS. I will dispute others who do the same on some issues and some points. One of my BIG problems with pack rat is that he continues with ALL that and continues to beat the DRUM of FAKE NEWS with regards to the Epstein matter and Trump's (actual LACK of) involvement.

HItRed says little, other than his news of God's word that he claims to hear and the price of silver. Given that, he says little controversial.

If you go back to COVID, I continuously challenged saxitoxin for his LIES on the vaccine and on the disease itself and related matters. I do not recall YOU calling me full of rage then. Did you? My fight is for FACTS and a correct read of events, NOT an attack on individual, as pack rat does ALL the TIME. pack rat tells so many LIES that it is EASY to call him on such DUNG. He even repeated a LIE that was disproven the FIRST time he posted it. That is how desperate he is to TRY TO EMBARRASS TRUMP.

And you fall in to that same trap regarding Trump on many matters. You do so mostly in a civil manner, but fall into RAGE with expletives once in a while, TOO. Do you DENY THAT, Mookie?

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 2&start=75

This was on the bottom of the page AND was in the wrong thread because your PAL pack rat tried to hijack ANOTHER thread with his lies and his repetitive STOOOOOOOOOOOO-pid-i-TY.

[mookiemcgee]

No, you are making claims and ignoring what's already been argued and decided across multiple courtrooms.

Donald Trump LOST his suit claiming Jean Carrol couldn't say he was found guilty of raping her. In that seperate case after the guilty verdict, the judge said Trump has found guilty forcefully penetrating Carrol's vagina against her will which is 'rape' in common parlance. Trump was found guilty of raping Carrol

As is shown in the following notes, the definition of rape in the New York Penal Law is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its
definition in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes, and elsewhere.

The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump
“raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.
So why does this matter? It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury's $2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll's sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury
concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll's] breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape.” And while Mr. Trump is right that a $2 million award for such groping alone could well be regarded as excessive, that undermines rather than supports his argument. His argument is entirely unpersuasive. This jury did not award Ms. Carroll more than $2 million for groping her breasts through her clothing, wrongful as that might have been. There was no evidence at all of such behavior. Instead, the proof convincingly established, and the jury implicitly found, that Mr. Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll's vagina with his fingers, causing immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm. "

To believe anything else is to deny:
The evidence
The verdict a jury of his peers came to based on the evidence
A judge re-affirming it was rape.

If you choose to have 'faith' in Trumps words that none of this happened, then you do so in spite of the facts, evidence, adjudicated case law and reality.

You are an extreme partisan who's love of Trump has you choosing party of country and reality. You much like Kash Patel, are not a serious person.

[karel]

ok to get the story straight, bill said trump had no involvement at all , that has to ake you commie fogs upset

[jusplay4fun]

Let me again post again what I said about the Jean Carroll case:

Re: Crime and Justice
Post by jusplay4fun » Thu Dec 04, 2025 10:39 pm

mookiemcgee wrote: Thu Dec 04, 2025 12:23 pm
Yes fake news, deep state framejob to keep him from kicking vances ass in 2028, you have Walz Derangment Syndrome

Trump is a convicted rapist, you voted for him anyway because you and all republicans are retarded and hate America.

I have only used arguments Trump has already made against his political opponents and people who voted against him in the above, if you don't like it you should never have supported elected him as president... you set this bar, now we all live below it.

You're a LIAR, Mookie. Did you lower yourself to that LEVEL???? Well Done...!

Blame THAT on Trump too, that you were FORCED TO LIE.

Don't be a TOTAL LOSER, like pee rat.

For the record, Trump was found guilty of sexual assault in a Civil case, not a Criminal case, on a situation that, as I recall, was so long ago that the statute of limitation had passed on any criminal OR CIVIL case in the matter. A special law was passed to allow the civil case to go forward. To say he is a convicted rapist is a LIE. PERIOD.
In November 2022, Carroll filed her second suit against Trump (a.k.a. Carroll II), renewing her claim of defamation and adding a claim of battery under the Adult Survivors Act, a New York law allowing sexual-assault victims to file civil suits beyond expired statutes of limitations. (...)
the jury did not find Trump liable for rape and instead found him liable for a lesser degree of sexual abuse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_C ... d_J._Trump

Just because you WANT to believe what you FALSELY Claim does NOT make it so, Mookie. Get your Head OUT of the SAND. Don't be like your PAL pack rat.

Re: Epstein Client List
Post by jusplay4fun » Mon Nov 17, 2025 7:36 am

Thanks for a giving me a modicum of credit. Since you gave me permission, DDS, I will now post.

Of course WE ALREADY KNEW that Trump and Epstein had social connections a while back; they were both Rich men in NYC. That is NOT news and that does not make Trump a crimimal. And the so-called Trump "rape conviction" was in a civil trial and not a criminal case. That is a big difference. I think I already addressed that issue in an ealier post.(...)

more info, for those who want to know:
Donald Trump has not been criminally convicted of sexual assault; he was found civilly liable for sexual abuse and defamation in the E. Jean Carroll case, resulting in monetary judgments that have been appealed and partially affirmed on appeal. The distinction between a civil liability finding and a criminal conviction is central: the Carroll verdict required a preponderance of the evidence and produced financial damages, whereas no jury or court has imposed a criminal sentence for sexual assault against Trump.

https://factually.co/fact-checks/justic ... als-331675

IF Trump is Guilty of a Felony:
1) Why is Trump NOT in jail?
2) Why did this case end up in a CIVIL Court, that MOOKIE ALREADY ADMITTED.
3) Why was this civil jury decision reached AFTER the statute of limitations expire?
4) Why did they (in NY State and NYC) have to go after Trump with the passage of a SPECIAL LAW to go after Trump??
5) Why did so many vote for Trump for President if he is INDEED a convicted Felon?

6) Since Trump is NOT a convicted FELON, then why do people like the rat and Mookies keep bring up OLD NEWS that I have already REFUTED? Because they HAVE NOTHING ELSE, and they keep beating the False Drumbeat of "evil Nazi Trump" and keep bring up FAKE News, and keep repeating LIES. Because they have NOTHING else to try to use to TRY to Embarrass Trump and his Fellow Republicans. Who are the LOSERS here? NOT Trump, but LOSERS = pack rat = MookieMcGee.

[Pack Rat]

Trump is a convicted FELON!


People v. DJT Clayton Decision.pdf https://share.google/gm6NFfYk7kBOfjPlw

[Elaterate]

I've said it 1000+ times that Trump is a P.O.S. but even with that said I'm struggling to find how a JURY found him guilty of rape...

Verdict and aftermath (May 2023–present)
The jury reached a decision on May 9, 2023, after deliberating for less than three hours.[135] Considering the preponderance of the evidence, the jury delivered a verdict that first stated that Carroll had not proven that Trump raped her, and next stated that Carroll did prove that Trump was responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse

kinda repeated but a little different...

the judge asked the jury to find if the preponderance of the evidence suggested that Trump raped Carroll under New York's narrow legal definition of rape at that time, denoting forcible penetration with the penis, as alleged by the plaintiff;[d] the jury did not find Trump liable for rape and instead found him liable for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. In July 2023, Judge Kaplan said that the verdict found that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common definition of the word, i.e. not necessarily implying penile penetration.[e] In August 2023, Kaplan dismissed a countersuit and wrote that Carroll's accusation of rape is "substantially true"


I've never claimed to be a smart man but to me this reads that the judge didn't like the jury's decision and made one of his own. What do I have to type to find the " A Jury found him guilty of forcefully penetrating Carrol's vagina against her will"... again I think he's a POS and probably did force himself on her... but can't find this claim that a JURY found him guilty of rape.

If this isn't about Trump, why did they ask the Pedo Les Wexner a bunch of questions about Trump? Why couldn't they just ask him WHO he's seen Epstein with?