Crime and Justice

[Pack Rat]

Trump is getting his dream team SS ICE soldiers.



Press "watch on youtube"

[jusplay4fun]

pack rat posts a video UNAVAILABLE??? good move, pee rat...!

[riskllama]

ooc, does anybody know where all these ICE agents came from & what sort of training they received?

[mookiemcgee]

They are basically hiring anyone with previous military experience (any), with less training than you'd get at Chipotle, and a $50,000 signing bonus. You get an extra 100k signup bonus if you were arrested/charged for offenses relating to Jan 6th (Oath Keepers, Patriot Front members ect)

Part of the 2025 tax bill that passed was creating 75 billion dollars in new funding over the 4 years of Trumps current term, previously they had about 10billion/year budget, now it's about 30b. Basically the same yearly amount was cut from the food stamps program in this bill so effectively a 1:1 trade of letting poor american kids starve so we could chase poor foreign kids down and deport them.

[riskllama]

lolwut - an extra 50k for being a retard on Jan. 6??? seriously??? I just assumed that most of them would' have to be failed cops or soldiers(probably a lot of just "ex" soldiers as well, tbf), doesn't seem to be a shortage of those types down there. and I've heard varying reports as to the quality/quantity of training they get...*shrugs*. in any case, it seems like this whole thing was thrown together a lot more quickly than it probably should have been, given what footage I've seen of their performance, so far...

[mookiemcgee]

The Jan 6 part was just a joke, there is no bonus for being part of the failed insurrection... Though if they happen to stumble upon my post you could see this implemented in the near future.

The current signing bonus is about 50k though, and you get to break into peoples house without a warrant while masked and point guns at them.

[riskllama]

seemed pretty outrageous, but nothing really surprises me too much regarding the current US administration these days, mook...

[jusplay4fun]

Transgender gunman’s social media warnings emerge after fatal Rhode Island hockey game shooting

A 56-year-old shooter who killed two family members and injured three others at a high school hockey game in Pawtucket, Rhode Island, on Monday left a trail of social media posts warning that transgender individuals could go “berserk.”

Police identified the gunman as Robert Dorgan, who also used the name Roberta and the surname Esposito. Dorgan died at the scene from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound after opening fire during a senior night celebration at the Dennis M. Lynch Arena.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/tr ... r-AA1WwDv3

and

Associated Press
Shooter killed ex-wife and a son in Rhode Island ice rink attack, police say

PAWTUCKET, R.I. (AP) — The person who opened fire Monday during a youth hockey game at a Rhode Island ice rink was specifically targeting family members, killing an ex-wife and son as many fans dived for cover while a handful rushed the shooter to stop the attack, authorities said.

Pawtucket Chief of Police Tina Goncalves said the shooter's ex-wife Rhonda Dorgan and adult son Aidan Dorgan were killed and three others were injured: Rhonda Dorgan's parents, Linda and Gerald Dorgan, and a family friend Thomas Geruso, all of whom remained in critical condition Tuesday afternoon, Goncalves said

Police identified the shooter as 56-year-old Robert Dorgan, who died from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound. Dorgan also went by the names Roberta Esposito and Roberta Dorgano, authorities said. (...)

Gender identity apparently was a contributing factor to Dorgan’s wife filing for divorce in 2020 after nearly 30 years of marriage.

Court filings show Rhonda Dorgan initially wrote “gender reassignment surgery, narcissistic + personality disorder traits” as reasons for filing but crossed that out and wrote “irreconcilable differences which have caused the irremediable breakdown of the marriage.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/pol ... p_catchall

[jusplay4fun]

https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/detroi ... eath-house

In ConfedSS area, right?

[mookiemcgee]

ooc, does anybody know where all these ICE agents came from & what sort of training they received?

Turns out the really aren't bothering to train them much at all.

[Pack Rat]

When is the DOJ and FBI going to start their investigation into the obvious sex crimes in the TRUMP-EPSTEIN FILES?

[jusplay4fun]

Dem governor under fire after illegal alien allegedly stabs woman to death at bus stop: 'Heinous'

Police in Fairfax County, Virginia, arrested an illegal immigrant from Sierra Leone earlier this week on charges of second-degree murder after he fatally stabbed a woman, Stephanie Minter, 41, who was found dead at a local bus stop with several wounds to the upper body. The alleged suspect, Abdul Jalloh, 32, also has a criminal history of more than 30 arrests, according to DHS, including for rape, malicious wounding, assault, identity theft, contributing to the delinquency of a minor, assault, pick-pocketing and more.

The request from the Trump administration comes after the newly elected Democratic governor of Virginia signed an executive order to end cooperation between federal immigration officials and state and local law enforcement, a move several Democratic Party governors have taken recently amid President Donald Trump's move to increase deportation operations around the country.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/dem-g ... ea96&ei=25

[karel]

When is the DOJ and FBI going to start their investigation into the obvious sex crimes in the TRUMP-EPSTEIN FILES?

hey carpet muncher bill already said trump was not involved in anything, you retards should be worried more about your party

[jusplay4fun]

Meta, YouTube found guilty of negligence in history-making social media addiction trial
Chase DiBenedetto
Wed, March 25, 2026 at 2:10 PM EDT

A Los Angeles jury has ruled that social media giants Meta and Google-owned Youtube are guilty of negligent platform design that resulted in harm to a young user's mental health.

The ruling came after several days of deliberation in a personal injury lawsuit that industry experts say will have rippling effects on Big Tech.

The jury agreed with the plaintiff that the platforms' design features were a "substantial factor" in causing mental health-related harms and that company leaders knew their products could be dangerously addictive. The companies were ordered to split compensatory damages of $3 million, with Meta paying 70 percent and YouTube 30 percent.

"Today, a jury saw the truth and held Meta and Google accountable for designing products that addict and harm children," said court-appointed plaintiff counsel Lexi Hazam and Previn Warren, in a statement following the decision. "Top tech executives took the stand, and their own internal documents were put before a jury, revealing that company leadership knew their platforms were hurting kids and repeatedly chose profits over children's safety. This verdict sends an unmistakable message that no company is above accountability when it comes to our children."

Nonprofit Mothers Against Media Addiction (MAMA) called the decision "long overdue validation" for families of children who had been hurt or died by suicide after engaging with harmful content online. "Now, our elected officials must build on the momentum from this ruling by passing legislation that requires online platforms to be safe by design and ends Big Tech’s efforts to addict kids to their dangerous products," founder and executive director Julie Scelfo wrote.

Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg both testified in front of the jury last month.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/met ... p_catchall

I have said for a long time that Social Media was harming our Young People. As a high school teacher, I was and AM aware of this. There was evidence presented in Court of the Addictive nature of Social Media and we see that these companies wrote programs and algorithms to continue to keep young people online and ADDICTED.
SHAME on THEM for allowing and causing HARM to OUR most precious resource, OUR young people, who are NOW suffering the effects of their DRIVE for Profit over the Common Good and the health of these young people. This may be the "Tobacco VERDICTS" of this generation.

[Pack Rat]

Meta, YouTube found guilty of negligence in history-making social media addiction trial
Chase DiBenedetto
Wed, March 25, 2026 at 2:10 PM EDT

A Los Angeles jury has ruled that social media giants Meta and Google-owned Youtube are guilty of negligent platform design that resulted in harm to a young user's mental health.

The ruling came after several days of deliberation in a personal injury lawsuit that industry experts say will have rippling effects on Big Tech.

The jury agreed with the plaintiff that the platforms' design features were a "substantial factor" in causing mental health-related harms and that company leaders knew their products could be dangerously addictive. The companies were ordered to split compensatory damages of $3 million, with Meta paying 70 percent and YouTube 30 percent.

"Today, a jury saw the truth and held Meta and Google accountable for designing products that addict and harm children," said court-appointed plaintiff counsel Lexi Hazam and Previn Warren, in a statement following the decision. "Top tech executives took the stand, and their own internal documents were put before a jury, revealing that company leadership knew their platforms were hurting kids and repeatedly chose profits over children's safety. This verdict sends an unmistakable message that no company is above accountability when it comes to our children."

Nonprofit Mothers Against Media Addiction (MAMA) called the decision "long overdue validation" for families of children who had been hurt or died by suicide after engaging with harmful content online. "Now, our elected officials must build on the momentum from this ruling by passing legislation that requires online platforms to be safe by design and ends Big Tech’s efforts to addict kids to their dangerous products," founder and executive director Julie Scelfo wrote.

Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg both testified in front of the jury last month.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/met ... p_catchall

I have said for a long time that Social Media was harming our Young People. As a high school teacher, I was and AM aware of this. There was evidence presented in Court of the Addictive nature of Social Media and we see that these companies wrote programs and algorithms to continue to keep young people online and ADDICTED.
SHAME on THEM for allowing and causing HARM to OUR most precious resource, OUR young people, who are NOW suffering the effects of their DRIVE for Profit over the Common Good and the health of these young people. This may be the "Tobacco VERDICTS" of this generation.

Wise words from a teacher who continues to protect the billionaire child molesters.

[Pack Rat]

RELEASE THE TRUMP-EPSTEIN FILES!

[jusplay4fun]

Meta Will Pay Up to $16.7 Billion to Settle Its Social Media Harms Case—and That’s Not All

https://www.wired.com/story/meta-will-p ... -starters/

As a wise teacher once said, Social Media HURTS our children, especially adolescents. I teach adolescents, so I KNOW something about this topic.

[jusplay4fun]

Columbia police officer Christopher DeLong Jr. killed in shooting; suspect also dead

Columbia Officer Christopher DeLong Jr. was killed and Officer David Dymock wounded in a Saturday shooting; the suspect, Adam Dowdy, also died.

https://www.wltx.com/article/news/natio ... 749d0656fe

And which Party advocates getting rid of("defund the") Police?

Democratic candidates grapple with past stances on defunding the police ahead of key midterm races

Across the country, Democratic candidates are grappling with their previous positions calling to “defund the police” — a prominent demand during the protests that followed George Floyd’s death — by either reimagining public safety services altogether or redirecting some police departments’ funds to other social programs. Now, they are facing tough questions about their past positions.

Democratic leaders fear that the outlier opinions favoring police defunding may again tarnish the party’s brand and sink its chances of gaining ground in Congress, governor’s mansions and statehouses nationwide.

“It was a serious debate in 2020 that arguably cost us some seats that year and caused us to lose on something where we should have had the upper ground, because a few members of our party wanted to have a stylistic debate rather than one on substance,” said Antjuan Seawright, a Democratic strategist.

Seawright said to avoid being painted as politically toxic on safety issues, Democrats “have to define the narrative before others define us with the narrative.”

That task may become more challenging as the party grapples with a rising left flank that has captivated its base, just as Republicans move to make warnings about crime, immigration and growing support for democratic socialism core to their closing midterm message. (...)

n Wisconsin, a swing state known for razor-thin elections that President Donald Trump won in 2016 and 2024, insurgent democratic socialist State Rep. Francesca Hong has upended the Democratic gubernatorial primary by running far to the left in a state where independent and moderate voters are key in statewide races. A single mother and former line cook, Hong has captured the imaginations of liberal Democrats upset with the party establishment.

But she’s also raised concerns among more moderate Democrats that her past support for defunding the police would hurt her chances in the general election against Trump-backed Republican U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany.

“I support defunding the police as a first step towards abolishing the police,” Hong said in a 2020 social media post after the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man in Kenosha, Wisconsin. A year later, while serving in the State Assembly, Hong again posted about Blake, writing: “Police exist to uphold white supremacy. Defund then abolish. Reform can’t be an option.”

But as a candidate for governor, Hong had softened her tone while not disavowing her past statements. On Tuesday night, in the only televised debate ahead of the Aug. 11 primary, Hong said she did not support cutting police funding.

“The governor cannot defund the police and I’m not here to govern by slogan,” Hong said. “I’m here to make sure that I am the governor that is most serious about public safety, and that means investing in the things that we know prevent crimes.”

New York, Michigan politicians distance themselves from ‘defund’ calls
In neighboring Michigan, Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, a staunch progressive, has faced questions about his past support for defunding the police. Last November, CNN reported that the public health researcher and Rhodes scholar had deleted scores of posts expressing support for defunding the police. He now says he rejects the idea.

https://www.ap.org/news-highlights/elec ... erm-races/


and
https://fortune.com/2026/07/31/democrat ... -backlash/

and more:

Years after mayors from Democratic cities reversed course on calls to defund police departments, one of the leading Democratic candidates for governor of Wisconsin is running with a starkly different record: she didn’t just back defunding police — she called to abolish them. And unlike many in her party, she has neither deleted those posts nor renounced them.

Francesca Hong has repeatedly called for abolishing police departments, according to a CNN KFile review of her social media posts, interviews and statements.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/22/politics ... und-police

There are MORE such Democrats who want Police defunded so that CRIMINALS can hurt innocent citizens. Well Done, DEMOCRATS.

[Pack Rat]

Remember January 6th!

Trump unleashed thousands of rioters! Over a hundred cops seriously hurt and hospitalized!

Trump gave over a thousand pardons to these treasonous fukkkers!

...and you were saying what? Hypocrisy!


https://youtube.com/shorts/Hfsrm7pbokU? ... H-9ccN5wIN

[Apatheist]

I cannot understand why anyone thinks having fewer policemen, anywhere, is a good idea at the moment; nor indeed, underpaid and under-resourced (and hence more stressed) officers who perhaps feel the need to take out their frustrations on the public.
What we need - everywhere - is properly trained and supported officers who do the job that the community wants and needs them to do - letting the public go about their lawful business without "let or hindrance" and showing no fear or favour. Yes we need to weed out and remove the racists who will arrest someone (or worse) because of who they are; but also the wokeists who let people get away with crimes because they support their causes.
Uphold the law, carry out your duties faithfully and fairly, and lock up the bad guys, that's all we want.
It wouldn't hurt if our leaders set better examples too.

[Pack Rat]

Sometimes you have a responsibility to defend yourself and viciously attack a pig!




https://youtube.com/shorts/zrdvWsjhwM0? ... F_jZvoUA10