Moderator: Community Team
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
joecoolfrog wrote:Account babysitting is allowed in order that people dont miss turns. To do it frequently simply to gain an advantage in freestyle games is cheating !
My second point is: though we do take turns for each other from time to time, skyt is not the only one who is playing. The most important part of our strategy is to play at the same time. But, if for some reason, one of us cannot play, his/her turn will be taken by another player. We all know each otherās password. About 50% of the time, the 3 of us, meet up in me and danbempās room after class, and play our turns. During weekends, however, if I am in the room, I will play only with danbemp, if I am at home with my girlfriend, I will only play with her, and take turn for the other person. And very rarely, (this happened less than 10 times), I will take turns for all 3 people because of the time conflict (exams etc).
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
GreecePwns wrote:joecoolfrog wrote:Account babysitting is allowed in order that people dont miss turns. To do it frequently simply to gain an advantage in freestyle games is cheating !My second point is: though we do take turns for each other from time to time, skyt is not the only one who is playing. The most important part of our strategy is to play at the same time. But, if for some reason, one of us cannot play, his/her turn will be taken by another player. We all know each otherās password. About 50% of the time, the 3 of us, meet up in me and danbempās room after class, and play our turns. During weekends, however, if I am in the room, I will play only with danbemp, if I am at home with my girlfriend, I will only play with her, and take turn for the other person. And very rarely, (this happened less than 10 times), I will take turns for all 3 people because of the time conflict (exams etc).
Have you read this, joecoolfrog?
joecoolfrog wrote:Yes
He says that in half the games he takes turns for another player in order that the team can always work in sync - that is not account sitting that is abusing the system. Its cheating my friend
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
SkyT wrote:or do I feel that if I make more games and win more, people will hate me more?
wicked wrote:Admin can verify that payment was made from different cards under different names
That is correct for all three accounts.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote: it is a HUGE advantage to have control of mulitiple accounts.
wicked wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote: it is a HUGE advantage to have control of mulitiple accounts.
Agreed. We're currently discussing it and are open to suggestions on how to prevent "de facto multiple accounts" while still being fair to people who have legit account-sitters. We allow account babysitting when someone is unable to access their account, but this situation goes beyond that and into the realm of unfairness.
wicked wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote: it is a HUGE advantage to have control of mulitiple accounts.
Agreed. We're currently discussing it and are open to suggestions on how to prevent "de facto multiple accounts" while still being fair to people who have legit account-sitters. We allow account babysitting when someone is unable to access their account, but this situation goes beyond that and into the realm of unfairness.
DiM wrote:the easiest method of doing this would be to implement a sitter function where a player logs in on another account with his own password and has limited access. (no starting or joining games no pms feedback or posting in forums) just taking turns.
also besides this siting function there can be added several additional rules like:
no sitting for more than 1 account at a time.
no sitting for more than a week.
etc.
wicked wrote:DiM wrote:the easiest method of doing this would be to implement a sitter function where a player logs in on another account with his own password and has limited access. (no starting or joining games no pms feedback or posting in forums) just taking turns.
also besides this siting function there can be added several additional rules like:
no sitting for more than 1 account at a time.
no sitting for more than a week.
etc.
Interesting ideas. I like the limited functionality of a sitter's access. I remember seeing this proposed before here. Although I'm sure there'd be ways to circumvent the retrictions, it would definitely be a step in the right direction. And if implemented with or after the vacation button, we could even impose a shorter time period, e.g. if you're gone for the weekend, have an account-sitter if you'd like to not use the vacation setting, but if gone for longer than say 3 days, use the vacation setting or a combination of both. Would this be fair?
joecoolfrog wrote:I dont like the freestyle loopholes but Lack seems to find them acceptable so we must just put up with them,therefore Alster and JR are not cheating and presumably dont care if others find their tactics cheap.Taking the majority of turns in a team game however is a different story,that really is cheating and it seems that admin intend to put a stop to it if possible.
joecoolfrog wrote:I dont like the freestyle loopholes but Lack seems to find them acceptable so we must just put up with them,therefore Alster and JR are not cheating and presumably dont care if others find their tactics cheap.Taking the majority of turns in a team game however is a different story,that really is cheating and it seems that admin intend to put a stop to it if possible.
Danbemp wrote:congrats on no1 dude, and if they dont like the way we play, THEY CAN GO f*ck THEMSELVES, lets quit this shit and find some other game to play
joecoolfrog wrote:Danbemp wrote:congrats on no1 dude, and if they dont like the way we play, THEY CAN GO f*ck THEMSELVES, lets quit this shit and find some other game to play
Good idea,go and cheat elsewhere
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users