Moderator: Community Team
has to be the winner!DiM wrote:i nominate benjikat
[size=0]Not[/size] Yourebelman wrote:Using the scoreboard to determine skill level gives a good indication but its not an exact science. I have played against some fine players below lieutenant rank all the ways down to cooks that can play well. With this in mind i'm wondering who people think are the best players below 1,800 pts. I'm going to nominate Amanda1 having played both with and against her in several games now i think her score significantly underestimates her skill level.
hmmm good call, but he doesn't really count he is a captain in disguiseDiM wrote:i nominate benjikat
He's good at 4 player singles, to be fair, but I taught him everything (he was a cook at the time).DAZMCFC wrote:i nominate myself.i`m a great player, a bit erratic in escalating. only play 4 player flat rate though.
otherwise Norse.

excellent choice although not sure if he really meets the criteria and last time i looked he was a captain but he may have dropped pts recentlyTwill wrote:He's a lieutenant but I'll throw my vote in for Wacicha
One of the few "good" players who will play with (and train) new players - anyone who will risk their points as well as their armies is a better player than many
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Good call...Twill wrote:He's a lieutenant but I'll throw my vote in for Wacicha
One of the few "good" players who will play with (and train) new players - anyone who will risk their points as well as their armies is a better player than many
BeakerWMA wrote:Good call...Twill wrote:He's a lieutenant but I'll throw my vote in for Wacicha
One of the few "good" players who will play with (and train) new players - anyone who will risk their points as well as their armies is a better player than many