Conquer Club

The 757 that hit the Pentagon

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

read the subject

 
Total votes : 0

Postby xtratabasco on Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:29 pm

soundout9 wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:
soundout9 wrote:What exactually do you think happened then?



I think this happened



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... eptions%22

Ive watched about half of that so far and well i gotta give it to you it has some convencing things. im starting to not be so sure about the pentagon. The pentagon deff does look fishy. but the other things about the world trade centers i still belive the gov and the discovery channel.



well thanks for your honesty. Im not 100% sure either, just trying to get to the bottom of it.

hope you have the time to finish it and reply when your done.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby muy_thaiguy on Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:39 pm

:lol: I just watched a conspiracy video that actually used a Wiley Coyote cartoon to "prove" that no jet hit the pentagon! :lol:

Here it is.

The video
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby xtratabasco on Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:42 pm

the only conspircy going on is the one done by this government.


PNAC (the neo-cons) choose to go to war before 911 and said they couldnt do it because the people of the US wouldnt go for it unless we had a Pearl Harbor type event.....


well thats exactly what happened.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby Backglass on Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:43 pm

All I gotta say after all this xtratabasco is that you must live a very angry, paranoid life.

I hope you get some help some day and quit looking in the bushes for big brother.
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby soundout9 on Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:46 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
soundout9 wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:
soundout9 wrote:What exactually do you think happened then?



I think this happened



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... eptions%22

Ive watched about half of that so far and well i gotta give it to you it has some convencing things. im starting to not be so sure about the pentagon. The pentagon deff does look fishy. but the other things about the world trade centers i still belive the gov and the discovery channel.



well thanks for your honesty. Im not 100% sure either, just trying to get to the bottom of it.

hope you have the time to finish it and reply when your done.

Im working on it
Private soundout9
 
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Good ol' MO Clan: Next-Gen Gamers

Postby soundout9 on Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:48 pm

Backglass wrote:All I gotta say after all this xtratabasco is that you must live a very angry, paranoid life.

I hope you get some help some day and quit looking in the bushes for big brother.

This aint flame wars.......
and watch it its got some evidence i dont belive all of it but some of it hits some interesting points...and im still not done watching it
Private soundout9
 
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Good ol' MO Clan: Next-Gen Gamers

Postby soundout9 on Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:17 pm

All right i finished the movie i need to think abou this. Kinda hard to think w/ your gf on the phone. tell ya what i think tommarow
Private soundout9
 
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Good ol' MO Clan: Next-Gen Gamers

Postby Backglass on Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:31 pm

soundout9 wrote:and watch it its got some evidence


No, it has no evidence at all. It has rumor, innuendo, speculation & doubt. Sometimes the truth is hard to swallow.
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby xtratabasco on Thu Oct 18, 2007 12:32 am

Backglass wrote:
soundout9 wrote:and watch it its got some evidence


No, it has no evidence at all. It has rumor, innuendo, speculation & doubt. Sometimes the truth is hard to swallow.



yeah thats why "your proof" cannot be viewed.



:lol: :lol: :lol:



go get you some money backglass




:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby xtratabasco on Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:52 pm

backglass this link http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... &plindex=1 for some reason they pulled down the other link, this video shows 10 times more pictures than you showed. It even shows pictures this government took inside the rings of the pentagon, but like yours there is no pictures of the 757.


go figure.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby Bavarian Raven on Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:58 pm

...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east :lol:
Sergeant 1st Class Bavarian Raven
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:52 pm
Location: Canada, Vancouver

Postby xtratabasco on Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:38 am

Backglass wrote:
soundout9 wrote:and watch it its got some evidence


No, it has no evidence at all.



kind of like the pentagon, no evidence of a 757 :lol: :lol: :lol:

but lets not just take my word for it, let Major Douglas Rokke explain



Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Director U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project. 30-year Army career.

Article 8/19/05: Regarding the impact at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001 "When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile."


http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/


next :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby Backglass on Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:47 pm

XTRA in his Tin Foil Hat:

Image
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby xtratabasco on Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:03 pm

Backglass wrote:XTRA in his Tin Foil Hat:

Image






Rob Balsamo – Commercial airline pilot. Co-founder, Pilots for 9/11 Truth. 4,000+ total hours flown.

Statement to this website 7/23/07: "In May 2006, I was watching Glenn Beck’s show on CNN. The Department of Defense had just released the infamous "5 frames" of stop-action video of the pentagon attack. Beck showed the frames and commented, "You can see a 757 in 10 seconds flat! Either that or a naked Michael Moore heading for the buffet! This should put all those conspiracy theories to rest". While watching it, I'm thinking to myself, "I can’t see any 757.” And I'm asking myself, “Are there still unresolved questions regarding 9/11?"

So I started poking around on the Internet trying to find anything I can to back up the government’s story because I didn't want to believe our government might have had something to do with 9/11.

Early on, I came across Operation Northwoods. It blew me away that elements of our government had seriously planned acts of terrorism inside the United States to justify invading Cuba. Consider that 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean had said, "The greatest failure of 9/11 was lack of imagination", yet just under 40 years prior, elements of our own government imagined perpetrating such an event!

In late summer of 2006, I co-founded the group Pilots for 9/11 Truth, to more formally conduct research on the aviation-related aspects of 9/11. In August 2006, Pilots for 9/11 Truth received from the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) a copy of the Flight Data Recorder data of Flight 77, which, according to the official account, hit the Pentagon.

We analyzed the data and announced our conclusion on 3/26/07 that "The information provided by the NTSB does not support the 9/11 Commission Report of American Airlines Flight 77 impact with the Pentagon." Much more information about this can be found in our video documentary and our press release.

So now, a year after I began looking into the events of 9/11 and having devoted a lot of time and effort researching those events, I'm frustrated because we haven't been able to find anything to confirm the government's story. And what's worse is that the FBI and NTSB refuse to even discuss with us the many obvious problems we found in the Flight 77 Flight Data Recorder.

I continue to work with my colleagues at Pilots for 9/11 Truth, to grow the organization and to continue our research into the aviation-related aspects of 9/11, looking for confirmation of the government’s story."






:D
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby Backglass on Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:08 pm

Backglass wrote:XTRA in his Tin Foil Hat:

Image
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby Dancing Mustard on Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:39 am

Backglass wrote:
Backglass wrote:XTRA in his Tin Foil Hat:

Image


Tee Hee
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Corporal Dancing Mustard
 
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Postby Snorri1234 on Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:10 am

Bavarian Raven wrote:...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east :lol:


I think this is the best argument against these conspiracies. The government seems to be compromised of idiots!
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby s.xkitten on Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:13 am

Snorri1234 wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east :lol:


I think this is the best argument against these conspiracies. The government seems to be compromised of idiots!


seems?


no no, they really are comprised of idiots.
User avatar
Sergeant s.xkitten
 
Posts: 6911
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: I dunno

Postby Snorri1234 on Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:15 am

s.xkitten wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east :lol:


I think this is the best argument against these conspiracies. The government seems to be compromised of idiots!


seems?


no no, they really are comprised of idiots.


But maybe that is part of the conspiracy too?
Maybe GW Bush is actually a genius, but he acts like an idiot to trick us!
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby s.xkitten on Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:16 am

Snorri1234 wrote:
s.xkitten wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east :lol:


I think this is the best argument against these conspiracies. The government seems to be compromised of idiots!


seems?


no no, they really are comprised of idiots.


But maybe that is part of the conspiracy too?
Maybe GW Bush is actually a genius, but he acts like an idiot to trick us!


you can't act that stupid :wink:
User avatar
Sergeant s.xkitten
 
Posts: 6911
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: I dunno

Postby xtratabasco on Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:25 pm

s.xkitten wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:
s.xkitten wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east :lol:


I think this is the best argument against these conspiracies. The government seems to be compromised of idiots!


seems?


no no, they really are comprised of idiots.


But maybe that is part of the conspiracy too?
Maybe GW Bush is actually a genius, but he acts like an idiot to trick us!


you can't act that stupid :wink:


true, but we still dont have any evidence of a 757 hitting the pentagon or vaporizing. :?
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby heavycola on Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:28 pm

xtratabasco wrote:backglass this link http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... &plindex=1 for some reason they pulled down the other link, this video shows 10 times more pictures than you showed. It even shows pictures this government took inside the rings of the pentagon, but like yours there is no pictures of the 757.


go figure.


Memo to all shadowy ubergovernment figures/al qaeda teenagers armed with nothing more than a bubble machine and some juicy fruit gum:

Please drive a 757 into this thread. Make the idiocy stop. I would suggest flying it into xtratabasco's head, but fear this would have no effect bar another thread claiming it never happened.

K tks
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby vtmarik on Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:29 pm

xtratabasco wrote:true, but we still dont have any evidence of a 757 hitting the pentagon or vaporizing. :?


Neither do we have any physical evidence that it was a drone or a missile.

Unless you have photos of drone parts...
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
User avatar
Cadet vtmarik
 
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.

Postby Guiscard on Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:32 pm

heavycola wrote:Please drive a 757 into this thread. Make the idiocy stop. I would suggest flying it into xtratabasco's head, but fear this would have no effect bar another thread claiming it never happened.

K tks


No. They'll be fine to fly a plane into his head as long as they make sure he collapses sideways (as anyone who knows anything knows is the result of a 747 hitting the side of the head knows is the case) rather than collapsing straight down (which, as everyone must realise, is a ridiculous way to fall if hit in the head by a 747, and if it were to happen we would be forced to conclude that the 747 didn't exist and the collapse was due to dynamite in the shoes).
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby xtratabasco on Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:32 pm

vtmarik wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:true, but we still dont have any evidence of a 757 hitting the pentagon or vaporizing. :?


Neither do we have any physical evidence that it was a drone or a missile.

Unless you have photos of drone parts...


I do, and it was in the many links provided. :D
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users