Conquer Club

PancakeTheoryFallsFlatAccordingToNIST

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Does the NIST support the Pancake Theory?

 
Total votes : 0

Postby xtratabasco on Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:33 pm

s.xkitten wrote:i'm not afraid to debate it...its just already been done before. He's repeating your thread, and i'm not going to repeat everything i've already posted.



yeah DaGip and others are supposed to follow you around through life just so they dont miss something you post. :roll:

God forbid you have to post the same information on different peoples threads.


you give yourself way to much importance here or for that matter anywhare. :lol:

not only are you a liar you also have a big fat f*ck head on your shoulders.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby s.xkitten on Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:51 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
s.xkitten wrote:i'm not afraid to debate it...its just already been done before. He's repeating your thread, and i'm not going to repeat everything i've already posted.



yeah DaGip and others are supposed to follow you around through life just so they dont miss something you post. :roll:

God forbid you have to post the same information on different peoples threads.


you give yourself way to much importance here or for that matter anywhare. :lol:

not only are you a liar you also have a big fat f*ck head on your shoulders.


I posted it in response to DaGip's point that he made in your thread, so no, he's not supposed to follow me around looking at my posts, he's supposed to remember what i said in response the last time he posted this.

Nice try though xtra
User avatar
Sergeant s.xkitten
 
Posts: 6911
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: I dunno

Postby Dancing Mustard on Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:51 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
s.xkitten wrote:i'm not afraid to debate it...its just already been done before. He's repeating your thread, and i'm not going to repeat everything i've already posted.



yeah DaGip and others are supposed to follow you around through life just so they dont miss something you post. :roll:

God forbid you have to post the same information on different peoples threads.


you give yourself way to much importance here or for that matter anywhare. :lol:

not only are you a liar you also have a big fat f*ck head on your shoulders.
I think she's telling you to go back and re-read Xtra.

Jumpity jump!
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Corporal Dancing Mustard
 
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Postby Snorri1234 on Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:46 pm

DaGip wrote:Stick to the topic. The topic is Does the NIST support the pancake theory? Really just a simple yes or no question.


And everyone with a little reading comprehension agrees that they don't. Because they say they don't. What's the point of this thread? Should I start a thread where I ask everyone if they think the US government supports the war on Iraq?
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby Backglass on Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:54 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:
DaGip wrote:Stick to the topic. The topic is Does the NIST support the pancake theory? Really just a simple yes or no question.


And everyone with a little reading comprehension agrees that they don't. Because they say they don't. What's the point of this thread? Should I start a thread where I ask everyone if they think the US government supports the war on Iraq?


:lol: <Applause>
Last edited by Backglass on Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby Titanic on Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:07 pm

NIST sais that in 2005, why dont you wait till early next year when they release the full investigation and finding.
User avatar
Major Titanic
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Postby xtratabasco on Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:44 pm

s.xkitten wrote:i'm not afraid to debate it...its just already been done before.



ok, here some new information. I think most of us with a working brain will agree with Col. Robert Bowman over, say, you. lol


Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.



"A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby s.xkitten on Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:51 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
s.xkitten wrote:i'm not afraid to debate it...its just already been done before.



ok, here some new information. I think most of us with a working brain will agree with Col. Robert Bowman over, say, you. lol


Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.



"A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible.


:-s this proves your point how?
User avatar
Sergeant s.xkitten
 
Posts: 6911
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: I dunno

Postby DaGip on Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:51 pm

Backglass wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:
DaGip wrote:Stick to the topic. The topic is Does the NIST support the pancake theory? Really just a simple yes or no question.


And everyone with a little reading comprehension agrees that they don't. Because they say they don't. What's the point of this thread? Should I start a thread where I ask everyone if they think the US government supports the war on Iraq?


:lol: <Applause>


<More Applause> :lol:
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby DaGip on Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:52 pm

Titanic wrote:NIST sais that in 2005, why dont you wait till early next year when they release the full investigation and finding.


Yes, very much interested in the final conclusion, I must say.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby Jehan on Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:17 pm

xtratabasco wrote:"A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible.

well if a man like that thinks the conspiracy is hogwash, who am i to disagree.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant Jehan
 
Posts: 683
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:22 am
Location: Wales, the newer more southern version.

Postby xtratabasco on Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:06 pm

s.xkitten wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:
s.xkitten wrote:i'm not afraid to debate it...its just already been done before.



ok, here some new information. I think most of us with a working brain will agree with Col. Robert Bowman over, say, you. lol


Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.



"A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible.


:-s this proves your point how?





but wait, theres more


Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force career.

Licensed commercial pilot. Licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic.
Essay: "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...

The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …

With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby Backglass on Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:09 pm

Jehan wrote:well if a man like that thinks the conspiracy is hogwash, who am i to disagree.


Having a successful professional life does not make you immune to being a nutjob.

We recently had a decorated shuttle astronaut drive across the country in a diaper to pepper spray a woman she thought was a romantic rival.

Should we ask her opinion too? After all she has orbited the planet. :lol:
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby xtratabasco on Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:15 pm

Backglass wrote:
Jehan wrote:well if a man like that thinks the conspiracy is hogwash, who am i to disagree.


Having a successful professional life does not make you immune to being a nutjob.

We recently had a decorated shuttle astronaut drive across the country in a diaper to pepper spray a woman she thought was a romantic rival.

Should we ask her opinion too? After all she has orbited the planet. :lol:


the example you gave is from a woman who was involved in a domestic violence assalt, and now trying to play the insane card.


how come you cant show us pictures of the 757 that this government says hit the pentagon and vaporized and get you 1 million dollars?
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby Backglass on Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:44 am

xtratabasco wrote:how come you cant show us pictures of the 757 that this government says hit the pentagon and vaporized


How come you think everyone is out to get you? ;)

Image
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby xtratabasco on Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:11 pm

Backglass wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:how come you cant show us pictures of the 757 that this government says hit the pentagon and vaporized


How come you think everyone is out to get you? ;)

Image



very nice :roll:
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby Backglass on Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:15 pm

How come you think everyone is out to get you?
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby Carebian Knight on Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:05 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
s.xkitten wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:
s.xkitten wrote:i'm not afraid to debate it...its just already been done before.



ok, here some new information. I think most of us with a working brain will agree with Col. Robert Bowman over, say, you. lol


Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.



"A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible.


:-s this proves your point how?





but wait, theres more


Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force career.

Licensed commercial pilot. Licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic.
Essay: "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...

The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …

With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged.


I guess it's time to start repeating posts, I know I've pointed this out in 1 or 2 threads about 9/11 and I'm sure it's been posted in more.

You mean to say that every person that says they saw the aircraft fly into the Pentagon/Trade Centers was paid by the government to say so. That's a lot of people to pay off.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Carebian Knight
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:42 pm
Location: Central Missouri

Postby unriggable on Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:12 pm

Not to mention a lot of wreckage to plant.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby xtratabasco on Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:15 pm

unriggable wrote:Not to mention a lot of wreckage to plant.



can you show us this wreckage?
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby unriggable on Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:20 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
unriggable wrote:Not to mention a lot of wreckage to plant.



can you show us this wreckage?


See any other thread you made for the pictures. Too lazy to search.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby Dancing Mustard on Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:20 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
unriggable wrote:Not to mention a lot of wreckage to plant.

can you show us this wreckage?

Can you show yourself the door?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Corporal Dancing Mustard
 
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Postby xtratabasco on Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:40 pm

yeah, thats what I thought. :roll:
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby DaGip on Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:02 am

Well, after researching xtra's claim that the NIST refutes the Pancake Theory that the government and PopularMechanics wants you to believe...I found that indeed...Xtra was right, he did his research well.

You should seriously consider taking 2 hours and watch this video about 9-11 and American Empire. You should also go to the Library or bookstore or Amazon.com and acquire the book of the same name.

Here is the link to 9-11 and American Empire...you should listen very closely to Kevin Ryan (Former Underwriters Laboratories Inspector):

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... &plindex=0

Just for your info...This is a video and a book that Xtra has not seen or read as of yet!
Last edited by DaGip on Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby DaGip on Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:10 am

If you have any questions about the Pancake Theory, you should then read this thread.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: WILLIAMS5232