Conquer Club

(Thread of CC Records) 1st 5's & TOP 5's

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Postby DeyTa on Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:42 am

AAFitz wrote:
DeyTa wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:most rounds

470183 rounds 479


thanks blitz :)



this game was actually a two player game they simply played to break the record

DeyTa: lets make this building eh?
2007-05-30 02:14:49 - DeyTa: If i have asia, oceania and europe, i get 38 armies from continent bonuses, and 17 armies from amount of countries. TOTAL = 55 per turn
2007-05-30 02:14:56 - DeyTa: If you have africa, North america and south america, you get 35 armies from continent bonuses, and 19 from amount of countries. TOTAL = 54 per turn
2007-05-30 02:18:02 - Vengeantia: whatever :p
2007-05-30 10:35:18 - Vengeantia: why don't you deploy 1 army on each country DeyTa? That will take even longer ^^ :p :p :p :p



im not sure listing such games is a great idea...its like rewarding negative behavior... it will beget negative behavior...

nothing against them... id love to attack with a 100000 armies too, but I dont think it gets registered as a record that way


theres obviously a gray area here...because its hard to tell when people are purposely building, or really just playing, but i see some black and white on this one......its right there in black and white :wink:


well i see what you are saying. It isn't a very useful record if it isn't competitive. But hey, is it really negative behaviour? Unless it is harming the servers in some way (which i doubt), its just a fun game. i know LOADS of buildinggames out there...i even have them bookmarked :P
User avatar
Corporal DeyTa
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:30 am

Re: fastest game

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:48 am

naktay01 wrote:Played a 6 player speed/freestyle assassin game last night that I won in the 1st round at 1min 48 seconds. Will this qualify for one of the fastest games.

love the record keeping always enjoyable to scroll thru.




TY naktay, yes you are correct, this would place you #2 fastest to complete a game all time


refer to page 1 for all the records, it is near the bottom


congratz and nice new avatar


will add this later :wink:
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby AAFitz on Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:51 am

im not at all saying you cant play it, im just saying its possible it shouldnt be listed here

its the same as a player losing to another 100 times in a row to get a record... it wont be listed here...

grated thats against the rules, but even if it wasnt it wouldnt be against the rules

im in at least 5 games over 200 rounds... and I know for a fact every person in them wants them over....they just dont want to lose them...

Again...i dont care how you play your games, though you probably will hiccup the site if you auto attack 110000 to 100000 men but I dont think this is what the top 5 is for

if everyone decides otherwise, than thats fine with me... I just happen to doubt they will
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: fastest game

Postby firth4eva on Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:52 am

Blitzaholic wrote:
naktay01 wrote:Played a 6 player speed/freestyle assassin game last night that I won in the 1st round at 1min 48 seconds. Will this qualify for one of the fastest games.

love the record keeping always enjoyable to scroll thru.




TY naktay, yes you are correct, this would place you #2 fastest to complete a game all time


refer to page 1 for all the records, it is near the bottom


congratz and nice new avatar


will add this later :wink:


3 actually as i did it first
User avatar
Captain firth4eva
 
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:02 am

DeyTa wrote:
AAFitz wrote:
DeyTa wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:most rounds

470183 rounds 479



thanks blitz :)




this game was actually a two player game they simply played to break the record


DeyTa: lets make this building eh?
2007-05-30 02:14:49 - DeyTa: If i have asia, oceania and europe, i get 38 armies from continent bonuses, and 17 armies from amount of countries. TOTAL = 55 per turn

2007-05-30 02:14:56 - DeyTa: If you have africa, North america and south america, you get 35 armies from continent bonuses, and 19 from amount of countries. TOTAL = 54 per turn
2007-05-30 02:18:02 - Vengeantia: whatever :p
2007-05-30 10:35:18 - Vengeantia: why don't you deploy 1 army on each country DeyTa? That will take even longer ^^ :p :p :p :p




im not sure listing such games is a great idea...its like rewarding negative behavior... it will beget negative behavior...


nothing against them... id love to attack with a 100000 armies too, but I dont think it gets registered as a record that way



theres obviously a gray area here...because its hard to tell when people are purposely building, or really just playing, but i see some black and white on this one......its right there in black and white :wink:




well i see what you are saying. It isn't a very useful record if it isn't competitive. But hey, is it really negative behaviour? Unless it is harming the servers in some way (which i doubt), its just a fun game. i know LOADS of buildinggames out there...i even have them bookmarked :P




i see your points, but this is hard to filter out, let me think upon this one and reflect.

there has been other games that went many rounds like 300 plus and could of ended earlier, but some have dragged it out to make them longer rounds, jr is in a game where the game could of been eneded maybe, but they all keep building, i DO NOT have a problem with this, some games over 300 rounds can be ended, but they are be dragged out and along, another example is the former record of 400 rounds, well that could of ended several rounds earlier, but wanted it to purposefully end on exactly 400, again i have no problem with this, so if you do it to one game, you must to all, not sure this would be fair either.

if all are putting in the time and effort and all are agreeing, i dont care, many also have dont this not with just rounds, but armies counts and build ups, if they spend the time and do it, well, why not count it?


it is a challenging decision to make but i think i have to led it slide even though deyta is prolonging this and it is obvious, i think he spend all the time and effort to do it, why not give him the credit?


again, others that have lasted over 300 rounds, there is several i have seen, have dragged out more rounds then then need to and are continuing to do it.


when records are being tracked and becoming popular, well many want their names post on the CC site of all time guiness records, or whatever you want to call it, and you really cant blame them, they also have announced this is game chat, which is legal, and they are not cheating.


so i am leaning toward giving them the benefit of the doubt and i may take some slack or crap for it, but i will have to live with it, i hear what aafitz is saying and has a great point, let me think more about it, but i hope my points on this make sense or clear things up as well.


cheers
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:03 am

Blitzaholic wrote:
DeyTa wrote:
AAFitz wrote:
DeyTa wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:most rounds

470183 rounds 479



thanks blitz :)




this game was actually a two player game they simply played to break the record


DeyTa: lets make this building eh?
2007-05-30 02:14:49 - DeyTa: If i have asia, oceania and europe, i get 38 armies from continent bonuses, and 17 armies from amount of countries. TOTAL = 55 per turn

2007-05-30 02:14:56 - DeyTa: If you have africa, North america and south america, you get 35 armies from continent bonuses, and 19 from amount of countries. TOTAL = 54 per turn
2007-05-30 02:18:02 - Vengeantia: whatever :p
2007-05-30 10:35:18 - Vengeantia: why don't you deploy 1 army on each country DeyTa? That will take even longer ^^ :p :p :p :p




im not sure listing such games is a great idea...its like rewarding negative behavior... it will beget negative behavior...


nothing against them... id love to attack with a 100000 armies too, but I dont think it gets registered as a record that way



theres obviously a gray area here...because its hard to tell when people are purposely building, or really just playing, but i see some black and white on this one......its right there in black and white :wink:




well i see what you are saying. It isn't a very useful record if it isn't competitive. But hey, is it really negative behaviour? Unless it is harming the servers in some way (which i doubt), its just a fun game. i know LOADS of buildinggames out there...i even have them bookmarked :P




i see your points, but this is hard to filter out, let me think upon this one and reflect.

there has been other games that went many rounds like 300 plus and could of ended earlier, but some have dragged it out to make them longer rounds, jr is in a game where the game could of been eneded maybe, but they all keep building, i DO NOT have a problem with this, some games over 300 rounds can be ended, but they are be dragged out and along, another example is the former record of 400 rounds, well that could of ended several rounds earlier, but wanted it to purposefully end on exactly 400, again i have no problem with this, so if you do it to one game, you must to all, not sure this would be fair either.

if all are putting in the time and effort and all are agreeing, i dont care, many also have dont this not with just rounds, but armies counts and build ups, if they spend the time and do it, well, why not count it?


it is a challenging decision to make but i think i have to led it slide even though deyta is prolonging this and it is obvious, i think he spend all the time and effort to do it, why not give him the credit?


again, others that have lasted over 300 rounds, there is several i have seen, have dragged out more rounds then then need to and are continuing to do it.


when records are being tracked and becoming popular, well many want their names post on the CC site of all time guiness records, or whatever you want to call it, and you really cant blame them, they also have announced this is game chat, which is legal, and they are not cheating.


so i am leaning toward giving them the benefit of the doubt and i may take some slack or crap for it, but i will have to live with it, i hear what aafitz is saying and has a great point, let me think more about it, but i hope my points on this make sense or clear things up as well.



cheers


im in like 4 of the 5 longest round games 8)
Last edited by JOHNNYROCKET24 on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
JR's Game Profile

show
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52

Re: fastest game

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:04 am

firth4eva wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
naktay01 wrote:Played a 6 player speed/freestyle assassin game last night that I won in the 1st round at 1min 48 seconds. Will this qualify for one of the fastest games.

love the record keeping always enjoyable to scroll thru.




TY naktay, yes you are correct, this would place you #2 fastest to complete a game all time


refer to page 1 for all the records, it is near the bottom


congratz and nice new avatar


will add this later :wink:


3 actually as i did it first



it would be tied for # 2


you both would get 2 and you name 1st on the umber 2, correct, cause you were 1st, but he would get 2 as well, then the next one would say 4, there is no 3
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby AAFitz on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:10 am

its fine with me... but its asking for trouble, which will be apparent very soon
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:25 am

top 5 all time cc scores


1. Blitzaholic 4386
2. Yosevuk 3858
3. Gibbom 3838
4. SkyT 3727
5. Bilbo 3719




congratz skyt for cracking into the top 5 all time


updated


1. Blitzaholic 4386
2. SkyT 3865
3. Yosevuk 3858
4. Gibbom 3838
5. Bilbo 3719


wow, slow down skyt :shock:

now hit # 2


and krusher closing in now at 3540, 180 off from top 5 scores
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby firth4eva on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:28 am

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
DeyTa wrote:
AAFitz wrote:
DeyTa wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:most rounds

470183 rounds 479



thanks blitz :)




this game was actually a two player game they simply played to break the record


DeyTa: lets make this building eh?
2007-05-30 02:14:49 - DeyTa: If i have asia, oceania and europe, i get 38 armies from continent bonuses, and 17 armies from amount of countries. TOTAL = 55 per turn

2007-05-30 02:14:56 - DeyTa: If you have africa, North america and south america, you get 35 armies from continent bonuses, and 19 from amount of countries. TOTAL = 54 per turn
2007-05-30 02:18:02 - Vengeantia: whatever :p
2007-05-30 10:35:18 - Vengeantia: why don't you deploy 1 army on each country DeyTa? That will take even longer ^^ :p :p :p :p




im not sure listing such games is a great idea...its like rewarding negative behavior... it will beget negative behavior...


nothing against them... id love to attack with a 100000 armies too, but I dont think it gets registered as a record that way



theres obviously a gray area here...because its hard to tell when people are purposely building, or really just playing, but i see some black and white on this one......its right there in black and white :wink:




well i see what you are saying. It isn't a very useful record if it isn't competitive. But hey, is it really negative behaviour? Unless it is harming the servers in some way (which i doubt), its just a fun game. i know LOADS of buildinggames out there...i even have them bookmarked :P




i see your points, but this is hard to filter out, let me think upon this one and reflect.

there has been other games that went many rounds like 300 plus and could of ended earlier, but some have dragged it out to make them longer rounds, jr is in a game where the game could of been eneded maybe, but they all keep building, i DO NOT have a problem with this, some games over 300 rounds can be ended, but they are be dragged out and along, another example is the former record of 400 rounds, well that could of ended several rounds earlier, but wanted it to purposefully end on exactly 400, again i have no problem with this, so if you do it to one game, you must to all, not sure this would be fair either.

if all are putting in the time and effort and all are agreeing, i dont care, many also have dont this not with just rounds, but armies counts and build ups, if they spend the time and do it, well, why not count it?


it is a challenging decision to make but i think i have to led it slide even though deyta is prolonging this and it is obvious, i think he spend all the time and effort to do it, why not give him the credit?


again, others that have lasted over 300 rounds, there is several i have seen, have dragged out more rounds then then need to and are continuing to do it.


when records are being tracked and becoming popular, well many want their names post on the CC site of all time guiness records, or whatever you want to call it, and you really cant blame them, they also have announced this is game chat, which is legal, and they are not cheating.


so i am leaning toward giving them the benefit of the doubt and i may take some slack or crap for it, but i will have to live with it, i hear what aafitz is saying and has a great point, let me think more about it, but i hope my points on this make sense or clear things up as well.



cheers


im in like 4 of the 5 longest round games 8)

You're in 4 out of 5 of all games.
User avatar
Captain firth4eva
 
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:31 am

AAFitz wrote:its fine with me... but its asking for trouble, which will be apparent very soon



i hear ya bro, but if they put in the time, effort and energy for most rounds and its announced in game chat, not sure its a big deal, if it becomes problematic, i may need to look at it or re-look at it, but if the rounds or most rounds records is that important to people, pm a few players and go for it, many have done this, or several have, same as building armies counts.

i even seen in some chats with rounds and games over 300 plus rounds and they type right in the chat, ok, no one attack for 10 more rounds, all just build, some laugh, lol, some agree, some dont


looking at your games aafitz, it appears all are playing fair and no one had any idea it was going to last that long, and thats impressive, others are purposely going for the rounds records, and i dont have an issue with that, if CC does not.


although it does diminish the games and efforts and skills you are playing in, so i hear what your are saying and can validate that, it a tough decision :shock:
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby AAFitz on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:37 am

oh, im not suggesting its wrong in any way...

and i didnt realize people were extending them on purpose... id love to end my games... i just cant do it without losing...

but im guessing many will start up 2 player games and just play freestyle for hours with no other point for breaking this record now....

i suppose if it was happening all along it was kind of pointless anyways...
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:41 am

i think it is a different crack RL was speaking of :shock:
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:42 am

AAFitz wrote:oh, im not suggesting its wrong in any way...

and i didnt realize people were extending them on purpose... id love to end my games... i just cant do it without losing...

but im guessing many will start up 2 player games and just play freestyle for hours with no other point for breaking this record now....

i suppose if it was happening all along it was kind of pointless anyways...


I told Mike that right when he started keeping track of this.
JR's Game Profile

show
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:43 am

clapper011 wrote:oh my..nice what you can do with some tongues and fingers?;)



chrissy shame on you [-X


you need to do that with your girlfriends privately :-#
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:44 am

Blitzaholic wrote:
khazalid wrote:alright ladies. ive been in communion with the ghost of freud regarding your inexplicable bravado. im reliably informed that subconsciously youre all looking for what all women truly desire - a good hard spanking. this is the basis for your posturing and misplaced triumph, namely to maximise your embarassment and shame (and therefore pleasure) when you are duly handed the aforementioned spanking. being the kind soul that i am, i have reluctantly agreed to allay my misgivings and proceed to meet out your badly, badly wanted punishments. your cries of 'nooo' will serve only to increase my arousal, determination and cruelty. *mwah*



spank spank and ratta tap tap :lol:



court luvs this by the way khaz :P
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:52 am

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
AAFitz wrote:oh, im not suggesting its wrong in any way...

and i didnt realize people were extending them on purpose... id love to end my games... i just cant do it without losing...

but im guessing many will start up 2 player games and just play freestyle for hours with no other point for breaking this record now....

i suppose if it was happening all along it was kind of pointless anyways...


I told Mike that right when he started keeping track of this.



well how do you filter the games that are for real and purposeful?

again, some other games over 300 that extended some round,s so only 10, some a few, do i not count them either? a game gos for example 289 rounds and all want it to end at round 300 and could easily be done in round 289, do i count it as 300, game ends at 300? you see what i mean? it is a challenging decision, perhaps i just wont add it to the cc records of top 5, maybe will or wont, i think it is a great addition, but again, if cc is ok with this, hard for to disagree on it, i think both sides are well taken and understood.
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:58 am

jr, 315 positive feedbacks? :lol:


10 more in one day :shock:


stop being so nice to people


go back to your old ways :lol:
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:04 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:jr, 315 positive feedbacks? :lol:


10 more in one day :shock:


stop being so nice to people


go back to your old ways :lol:


316

I was always a nice guy :wink:
JR's Game Profile

show
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52

Postby Vengeantia on Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:23 pm

IRT AAFitz and Blitzy

Actually me and Deyta started the game to build kickass armies period.
First goal was 50k , then 100k armies etc ..
We went on and on and saw that the card set record was in reach.

That's why we published the game only after breaking the record of highest card set.

AAFitz It's like you only want the games to count where the record is broken by accident. That makes no sense. Most records are gained intentionnaly aren't they. :) Imo if there is records, you can't be surprised when people will want to break them.
And it's not like there's no effort involved lol :p Resisting the temptation to attack is quite hard too :)

I do'nt really care bout round total record, it's harder for more players as well.. But the card set, we broke that by hard work. Period.
User avatar
Captain Vengeantia
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:31 pm

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:27 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
AAFitz wrote:oh, im not suggesting its wrong in any way...

and i didnt realize people were extending them on purpose... id love to end my games... i just cant do it without losing...

but im guessing many will start up 2 player games and just play freestyle for hours with no other point for breaking this record now....

i suppose if it was happening all along it was kind of pointless anyways...


I told Mike that right when he started keeping track of this.



well how do you filter the games that are for real and purposeful?

again, some other games over 300 that extended some round,s so only 10, some a few, do i not count them either? a game gos for example 289 rounds and all want it to end at round 300 and could easily be done in round 289, do i count it as 300, game ends at 300? you see what i mean? it is a challenging decision, perhaps i just wont add it to the cc records of top 5, maybe will or wont, i think it is a great addition, but again, if cc is ok with this, hard for to disagree on it, i think both sides are well taken and understood.


its your thread and time. I personally dont care what game lasted the longest or how many armies or sets where cashed in.
JR's Game Profile

show
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52

Postby Robinette on Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:15 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:jr, 315 positive feedbacks? :lol:

10 more in one day :shock:

stop being so nice to people

go back to your old ways :lol:


316

I was always a nice guy :wink:



nice (nīs)
adj. nic·er, nic·est

1. Pleasing and agreeable in nature: had a nice time.
2. Having a pleasant or attractive appearance: a nice dress; a nice face.
3. Exhibiting courtesy and politeness: a nice gesture.
4. Of good character and reputation; respectable.
5. Overdelicate or fastidious; fussy.
6. Showing or requiring great precision or sensitive discernment; subtle: a nice distinction; a nice sense of style.
7. Done with delicacy and skill: a nice bit of craft.
8. Used as an intensive with and: nice and warm.


mis·un·der·stood /ˌmɪsʌndərˈstʊd/ Pronunciation[mis-uhn-der-stood]

–adjective
1. improperly understood or interpreted.
2. unappreciated.

–verb (used with object), -stood, -stand·ing.
1. to take (words, statements, etc.) in a wrong sense; understand wrongly.
2. to fail to understand or interpret rightly the words or behavior of.
Image
User avatar
Brigadier Robinette
 
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Postby AAFitz on Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:30 pm

please dont get me wrong... I more brought this up for discussion to see what people thought... it would be messy business deciding when a game was a game, and not just an effort to break a record.

and vengeantia, there is a big difference between hitting the card set in a real game where everyone is actually trying to win, and one thats just out to break the record. Saying it doesnt make sense is like saying it doesnt make sense to count a baseball game that went into 19 innings by accident as opposed to one where two teams went out and just purposely didnt swing for 100 innings... obviously there is a huge difference

But I really dont care either way, If all are included, all are included. Theres no way to know either way, so the decision was to include all, so im fine with that...I was just bringing it up to see what the thoughts were going to be on it.

theres a lot of categories that are very easily manipulated, just by putting time into them too..i have 275 feedbacks after all......unlike JR, im not the nicest person in here

either way, have fun with it...just let me know when you auto attack those puppies because i dont want to be in the middle of a turn when you do it



:D :wink:
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Postby DeyTa on Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:37 pm

AAFitz wrote:either way, have fun with it...just let me know when you auto attack those puppies because i dont want to be in the middle of a turn when you do it



:D :wink:


we're gonna pull that off when there are 1500 users online and a battle royale still running \:D/ :-^
User avatar
Corporal DeyTa
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:30 am

Re: fastest game

Postby naktay01 on Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:22 pm

firth4eva wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
naktay01 wrote:Played a 6 player speed/freestyle assassin game last night that I won in the 1st round at 1min 48 seconds. Will this qualify for one of the fastest games.

love the record keeping always enjoyable to scroll thru.




TY naktay, yes you are correct, this would place you #2 fastest to complete a game all time


refer to page 1 for all the records, it is near the bottom




congratz and nice new avatar


will add this later :wink:


3 actually as i did it first


thanks blitz.
wow firth4eva nice records. sorry to break in on your top 5. I'm sure you'll retake em eventually
If you think you are too small to be effective, you have never been in the dark with a mosquito
Corporal naktay01
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:44 am
Location: Highest score: 2663

PreviousNext

Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users