firstholliday wrote:this got me thinking.... what about a monopoly risk game?
there's already a monopoly risk map. i think it's either abandoned or on vacation.
Moderator: Cartographers
firstholliday wrote:this got me thinking.... what about a monopoly risk game?
yeti_c wrote:I wonder what Lack makes of this...
C.
rebelman wrote:DiM do you realise with this map you are doing something you swore never to do - create a symmetrical map !!!
Coleman wrote:I'd like to name this never going to be a map and then we can put it in stocks and throw rotten fruit and vegetables at it.
DiM wrote:
again the question is: why?
i'm getting kinda tired of asking why and yet nobody can offer a decent answer
benjikat wrote:Almost everyone is addicted to CC because they want to pit their strategic wits against others. This map doesn't allow that to happen AT ALL.
Even Doodle Earth requires a fair amount of strategy (I know you think it doesn't but my record on it shows otherwise), but this map wouldn't.
mibi wrote:
gamble? wtf? I think you need to find a different site if you want to gamble, there are plenty out there.
In my opinion, this map is one step in turning CC into a gas station with a slot machine.
Bottomline, let points be earned, not won or lost at the CC casino. thats lame.
Syzygy wrote:People don't want pure luck, they want strategy too.
A definite no.
edbeard wrote:I'm sure you will find a lot of people that will play this map, but I'm not sure that is a good thing.
Honestly I'm not fond of this or that egg idea either.
Doodle Earth is one thing. It's still conquer club though (well at least very close to it).
These maps are just gambling. There is the strategy of should I attack, or should I let others attack first. But, honestly this will come down to luck of the dice 90% of the time.
Conquer Club is about strategy and having fun. Points are just a byproduct. I don't want to see a map that, in my opinion, is solely based on points.
A lot of people will play it. Point grabbers. I don't think that's a good thing. Earning points is what matters.
I remember how you stopped unfair freestyle point gaining tactics in 1v1 games. You might not have done it in a way that everyone liked or thought was proper, but nobody can use these tactics again to get points. To me, this map goes against what that person did. Conquer Club is about fun and strategy not about gambling for points.
WidowMakers wrote:1) Just because it is played does not make it good for CC. Points on CC are supposedly there to help gauge a players ability to play the game. Yes there are issues with how it is handled. Single, double, triple, freestyle, no cards.... These all affect the score but hey all have something in common.
By adding this the points become more meaningless. Ranks and badges are useless.
2)IT IS NOT A MAP
I am not saying people won't play I am saying it is stupid. An dhere is why.
You might as well not even make a map and have Lack reprogram the code to randomly select a player to win.
Here is how it works.1) A player makes a game (2 player,3 player ,4 player .....whatever)
2) Game starts when last player joins.
3) Lack reprograms the code so random.org picks a winner based on the number of players
4) Points are automatically traded and there is no need for a map.
5) Do it again and complete destroy the point of this site.
THIS IS NOT CC. This is have fun gambling with fake points. If this was a gambling site, sure make it. It is not. It is a world domination strategy game.
All your idea does is replaces step 3 with 15 seconds of autoattack.
WM
Optimus Prime wrote: Both of those maps are specifically designed to circumvent the points system and to reward players for absolutely nothing but luck. They are a disgrace to the map-making community in my mind and should not even have been considered in the first place.
This site is not for players to start 100 games on a poorly designed map that will be over on the first turn of the game. Rewarding points for something as blatantly idiotic as that is the worst thing you can do.
DiM wrote:Coleman wrote:I'd like to name this never going to be a map and then we can put it in stocks and throw rotten fruit and vegetables at it.
again the question is: why?
i'm getting kinda tired of asking why and yet nobody can offer a decent answer
Coleman wrote:Explain to me how the first player in sequential won't win every game. If you would. Oh wait, that's the point? Silly me. We can't do this...
I have no idea how you can't see how broken this is. It completely destroys the point of the site, as pointed out above by several people. The arguments for are just from people who like gambling. This is not a gambling website.
This appears to be a waste of your time, I would encourage the pursuit of other projects.
Incandenza wrote:People already have ways of essentially gambling on this site. Feeling lucky? Try a 1v1 on AoM or KotM or Pearl Harbor, where the drop more often than not decides the winner. Feeling lucky? Jump into a freestyle triples games with two cooks against SkyT and his minions, where you could potentially walk away with 50+ points.
ghostlygirl wrote:if you're so certain that people will play this map,
why not make a poll and let the people who PLAY on the maps on this site decide whether or not its a good idea? take a gamble DiM.. after all isn't that what you're promoting here in your map?
DiM wrote:ghostlygirl wrote:if you're so certain that people will play this map,
why not make a poll and let the people who PLAY on the maps on this site decide whether or not its a good idea? take a gamble DiM.. after all isn't that what you're promoting here in your map?
polls are meaningless. what's the best case scenario for the number of people that would vote in a poll here?? 100-150? maximum.
if you read the whole thread you'll also find my post where i suggest a bet between me and the people that say no to this map. that bet also includes a survey conducted via pm on 1000 people from this site. i think that's far better than a simple poll, don't you?
hulmey wrote:DIM honestly , just admit when your wrong. Its part of being a man and not a child!!
DiM wrote:hulmey wrote:DIM honestly , just admit when your wrong. Its part of being a man and not a child!!
i'm the first to admit and apologize when i'm wrong but this is not the case here.
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users