Moderator: Cartographers
bloknayrb wrote:That's ridiculous... By that logic any map on this site that isn't firmly grounded in reality should be banned. Just because a map theme is controversial doesn't mean it shouldn't be made. It isn't even a political statement. For argument's sake, lets say it's a map based on a book. What makes it any less valid than the Middle Earth map or the Discworld map? The fact that people dispute whether or not those boundaries are valid?
elchananj wrote:It's because as you can see in the bible, this land belongs to Israel. it is never said to be holy for another nation other than the people of Israel.
oaktown wrote:Anyway, as there is no map and no mapmaker this is not a map thread and it should be deleted. This discussion belongs in Map Ideas.
bloknayrb wrote:I'd actually love to make this map, but lately I barely even have the time to work on my own. Still, I think this is a really good idea, with a lot of potential for excellent gameplay, and I'd very much like to see it get made. .
rebelman wrote:Why is isreal included in this title - would not the Holy land be more accurate?
I wrote:It's because as you can see in the bible, this land belongs to Israel. it is never said to be holy for another nation other than the people of Israel.
Twill wrote:I'd say strip out ANY reference to religion (is that possible?) and avoid using the word israel anywhere and you'd face much less opposition from a lot of people.
use sentences like "the Bible says..." is just going to set people against you because this becomes a religiously motivated map not a historical one (religion does not equal historical) and it becomes part of the discourse on Israel which is seeped in controversy.
oaktown wrote:Wait, this is a joke, right? Because I'm not entirely sure, but I would guess that the other 99.77% of the world population that isn't Jewish might disagree with you.
Like I said on page one, if this map is going to be made without protest (note my careful choice of words) it should be based on a historical period rather than a philosophical belief.
bloknayrb wrote:That's ridiculous... By that logic any map on this site that isn't firmly grounded in reality should be banned. Just because a map theme is controversial doesn't mean it shouldn't be made. It isn't even a political statement. For argument's sake, lets say it's a map based on a book. What makes it any less valid than the Middle Earth map or the Discworld map? The fact that people dispute whether or not those boundaries are valid?
bloknayrb wrote:Just because a map theme is controversial doesn't mean it shouldn't be made. It isn't even a political statement. For argument's sake, lets say it's a map based on a book. What makes it any less valid than the Middle Earth map or the Discworld map? The fact that people dispute whether or not those boundaries are valid?
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users