THE PIKACHU CLAN. PIKA-PIKA-PIKA-CHU!

by **heavycola** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:15 am

530 pages of piffle when a simple 'Of course not' would have done

by **Iliad** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:22 am

heavycola wrote:530 pages of piffle when a simple 'Of course not' would have done

this is actually the pikachu thread.

And misterman 10 thanks for proving that the pikachu clan can only imitate

by **Strife** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:48 am

Iliad wrote:
heavycola wrote:530 pages of piffle when a simple 'Of course not' would have done

this is actually the pikachu thread.

And misterman 10 thanks for proving that the pikachu clan can only imitate

We're just playing around. :roll:

by **unriggable** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:09 am

What the balls?

by **lord voldemort** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:23 am

i wondered where this thread was...
yes god exists!! :lol:

by **soundout9** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 5:33 pm

Yes, god exist. and so do pickachu's :lol:

by **mr. incrediball** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 5:36 pm

i don't like this god fellow. he appears to have overtaken the pikachu forum.

bin the bastard and let's get on with life :roll:

by **misterman10** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:07 pm

mr. incrediball wrote:bin the bastard and let's get on with life

Did I just see what I thought I saw :evil:

by **mr. incrediball** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:09 pm

misterman10 wrote:
mr. incrediball wrote:bin the bastard and let's get on with life
Did I just see what I thought I saw

hey, i don't particularly like god.

damn me (ultimate version of "sue me")

by **Chris7He** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:19 pm

mr. incrediball wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
mr. incrediball wrote:bin the bastard and let's get on with life
Did I just see what I thought I saw

hey, i don't particularly like god.

damn me (ultimate version of "sue me")

WANTED: GOD
Eternal Damnation REWARD

God is wanted for screwing me over on several occasions and not giving me what I want.

by **misterman10** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:20 pm

Chris, isn't there someplace else you would rather be, like stalking young girls on the playground?

by **soundout9** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:21 pm

misterman10 wrote:Chris, isn't there someplace else you would rather be, like stalking young girls on the playground?

He is a young boy.....so that is pretty creepy.

by **suggs** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:27 pm

No. "Of course its possible, but its impossble to prove, so it doesnt make sense to believe" is the only sensible answer ie, AGNOSTICISM. Atheism is as equally as absurd as theism.

by **misterman10** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:29 pm

I forget who it was, some guy from the Enlightenment or Industrial Revolution. I think it may have been Descartes... Anyways, he had his theory of probability, which said that its better to believe in God then not. Because if God doesn't exist, nothing is affected by believing in one. But if you don't believe, and there is a God, then you're screwed.

That has no personal opinion in it, just what I learned in history a while back.

by **suggs** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:35 pm

misterman10 wrote:I forget who it was, some guy from the Enlightenment or Industrial Revolution. I think it may have been Descartes... Anyways, he had his theory of probability, which said that its better to believe in God then not. Because if God doesn't exist, nothing is affected by believing in one. But if you don't believe, and there is a God, then you're screwed.

That has no personal opinion in it, just what I learned in history a while back.

Pascal, and Pascal's Wager. There are sevral flaws in the argument, but the most damning is that its based on a false dichotomy, ie believe in God or not.
But what if you believe in God, and it turns out that Allah exists? Or Zeus?
Worshipping a false God is even worse than not believing in hell.
A probability table along these lines clearly shows it is a safer bet not to belive at all.
Note, i'm not saying this "proves" God doesnt exist, it merely shows Pascal's Wager is a flawed.

by **misterman10** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:41 pm

Descartes...Pascal, I was way off :lol:

Yeah, I never thought of his wager as anything real or something that I would believe, but it is pretty interesting.

by **suggs** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:49 pm

Yeah its a cool argument. I have to admit i was disappointed whilst reading a logic book (GEEK ALERT-maxed out) that it doesnt quite work.
But its a good party trick!
I need to go to some better parties.

by **soundout9** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:49 pm

I love spam!

by **Backglass** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:53 pm

Does god exist?

Only in the minds of men.

by **dustn64** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:07 pm

suggs wrote:
misterman10 wrote:I forget who it was, some guy from the Enlightenment or Industrial Revolution. I think it may have been Descartes... Anyways, he had his theory of probability, which said that its better to believe in God then not. Because if God doesn't exist, nothing is affected by believing in one. But if you don't believe, and there is a God, then you're screwed.

That has no personal opinion in it, just what I learned in history a while back.

Pascal, and Pascal's Wager. There are sevral flaws in the argument, but the most damning is that its based on a false dichotomy, ie believe in God or not.
But what if you believe in God, and it turns out that Allah exists? Or Zeus?
Worshipping a false God is even worse than not believing in hell.
A probability table along these lines clearly shows it is a safer bet not to belive at all.
Note, i'm not saying this "proves" God doesnt exist, it merely shows Pascal's Wager is a flawed.

What I honestly would think is "at least I tried." I would live my days thinking that I gave my best effort at what I thought was right and stood by it. At least I believed in something and attempted to help myself in the afterlife.

by **Strife** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:14 pm

BUMP!

by **Chris7He** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:24 pm

soundout9 wrote:I love spam!

Yes and you tell me that I spam a lot.

Anyways, this thread has reached five hundred pages when arguments already made should have proven it for one side.

by **dustn64** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:25 pm

Chris7He wrote:
soundout9 wrote:I love spam!

Yes and you tell me that I spam a lot.

Anyways, this thread has reached five hundred pages when arguments already made should have proven it for one side.

you are too stupid to notice that this is the Pika Clan thread. Why would we believe you?

by **Chris7He** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:27 pm

dustn64 wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
soundout9 wrote:I love spam!

Yes and you tell me that I spam a lot.

Anyways, this thread has reached five hundred pages when arguments already made should have proven it for one side.
you are too stupid to notice that this is the Pika Clan thread. Why would we believe you?

I try to be recent and pikachu sucks Ash's balls.

by **Strife** on Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:27 pm

Chris7He wrote:
soundout9 wrote:I love spam!

Yes and you tell me that I spam a lot.

Anyways, this thread has reached five hundred pages when arguments already made should have proven it for one side.

What arguements? The only arguement in here is between me ad DM. :roll:

THE PIKACHU CLAN. PIKA-PIKA-PIKA-CHU!

Who is online