by LeiaBame on Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:23 am
Maybe It's because I'm new, but some of the Nag, Clive, Cena stuff just doesn't make since. I read it, re-read it, then figured I must be missing somthing, so I read the enither thread from the begining.
I didn't see nag as being a jerk; just trying to intice reactions from people.
I didn't see what Cena did as scummy; just trying to intice reactions from people(and maybe make a joke?). Plus, Cena is the one who said we shouldn't push for a lynch day one. If he was mafia, I'd think he'd want a lynch just to lynch someone.
The thing about Clive and the previous game referals; it doesn't make since to me to compare one previous game and come to a reasonalbe conclusion. I'm pretty sure in general comparing games isn't going to help a lot. It is, however, provoking. Either way, I don't think Clive should be giving Nag a hard time because of it. But he's new to mafia, too, so it's hard to blame him just yet. So, for now, my vote goes back to LSU Josh, because those Tigers are always sneaky.
Vote LSU
