
Original thought that started the case:
ga7 wrote:cena-rules wrote:vote nag
for 4 reasons
1) being a jerk
2) reacting badly to people trying ohter approaches (hiding domething
3) for having diddle compare himself to you
4) he should always die night 1
ok 2 is the oinly real reason but whatever.
Seeing as I just read the whole thing, I now find your reason particularly bogus: it wasn't about people trying other approaches at all. It looks to me that your mind was decided already on the vote and you just 'filled in the blank' with something that sounded credible. So far this is the scummiest thing in my eyes, so while it's not much, it deserves an Unvote Vote Cena
cena-rules wrote:SEEMS FAIR. Yeah I was always going to vote nag coz in my eyes he was the scummiest on day 1 other than the noobs but they dont know better
So here Cena admits it was bogus, but then when people question him further he backtracks:
cena-rules (talking about Nag) wrote:I meant that when Clive tried to do something he had a go at clive.
Thats it really
But that's bogus too...
First he gives "BS that looks like a good reason" with his vote, then basically admits he was trying to fool people, then acts like it made perfect sense.
All in all I'm not sure where this will lead us but since Cena & Clive seem a bit linked in their behavior (could be a coincidence but still), I think we might hit gold. Though I'm a bit worried that this seems like the only half-decent case we have today, the day practically passed with very few discussions, thus restricting our options... That ain't good
