Conquer Club

LAKOTA REVOLUTION

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby THORNHEART on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:29 pm

lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something
Hello THORNHEART,

You have received a formal disciplinary warning.
THORNHEART has earned himself a 24 hour Forum ban..
1st user that hasn't taken the C&A Report Abuse / Spurious Reports Warning we give seriously.
User avatar
Corporal THORNHEART
 
Posts: 369
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:47 pm
Location: USA

Postby Skittles! on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:30 pm

LOL THAT IS SO FUNNY LOL.

Don't be so arrogant.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14575
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby muy_thaiguy on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:30 pm

Link please.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Frigidus on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:31 pm

THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something


This can only end poorly.
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby radiojake on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:38 pm

THORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)


which was stolen from them in the first place
-- share what ya got --
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class radiojake
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Der Fuhrer on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:40 pm

THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something


That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.
New Recruit Der Fuhrer
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Tyr on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:41 pm

Der Fuhrer wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something


That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.


i honestly think i hate you
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Cadet Tyr
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:13 pm
Location: Mars

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby radiojake on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:41 pm

Der Fuhrer wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something


That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.


Did you join up to play CC at any time?
-- share what ya got --
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class radiojake
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Der Fuhrer on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:42 pm

radiojake wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)


which was stolen from them in the first place


I am curious. What are all those 'treaties' for, if we simply took their land from them? Also, why is it that wherever a white man landed, he is considered to have been an imperialist invader, whereas, all those fucking muzzies, chinks, pakis, niggers etc., moving into white homelands, are considered to be 'immigrants'? Why the differentiation? Fucking liberal morons. You must all love wearing pink.
New Recruit Der Fuhrer
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby radiojake on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:42 pm

Tyr wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something


That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.


i honestly think i hate you


He's only saying it to start shit. 50 posts in his first day says it all. Kind of funny, hope he's having a good laugh
-- share what ya got --
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class radiojake
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Der Fuhrer on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:45 pm

Tyr wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something


That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.


i honestly think i hate you


You do? I think my work is done then.
New Recruit Der Fuhrer
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby radiojake on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:45 pm

Der Fuhrer wrote:
radiojake wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)


which was stolen from them in the first place


I am curious. What are all those 'treaties' for, if we simply took their land from them? Also, why is it that wherever a white man landed, he is considered to have been an imperialist invader, whereas, all those fucking muzzies, chinks, pakis, niggers etc., moving into white homelands, are considered to be 'immigrants'? Why the differentiation? Fucking liberal morons. You must all love wearing pink.


well because (in the case of the US, and Australia) they were imperialist invaders who took over the running of the entire land, and gave next to nothing back. Australia even had a 'white australia policy' until the 1960's - Pretty weird considering it isn't a white native country.


Don't see any of the race groups you mentioned going to that kind of extreme.
-- share what ya got --
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class radiojake
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Der Fuhrer on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:45 pm

radiojake wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something


That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.


Did you join up to play CC at any time?


Am I not owning all of your asses at this very moment? I surely think so.
New Recruit Der Fuhrer
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Tyr on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:46 pm

Der Fuhrer wrote:
Tyr wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:lol the lakota indians just anulled their peace treaty with the united states as of today...they say they are no longer americans and were better off as a sovereign indian tribe ...they say the sucicide rates among their teens went up 120 percent since 1840 thats why they r leaving the usa...and that all their lands(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for) is now sovereign idian lands not accountable to usa standards or laws ...lol what r they gonna go on the war path or something


That's what we white people get for being so 'civilised' and letting these poor excuses for retards keep some land. We should have either absorbed them completely into our societies, to the point of diluting them right out of existence, or we should have completely destroyed them.


i honestly think i hate you


You do? I think my work is done then.



it took way longer then this for me to be even mildly annoyed by extras posts. in 40 minutes he has made me hate him
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Cadet Tyr
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:13 pm
Location: Mars

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby radiojake on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:48 pm

Der Fuhrer wrote: Am I not owning all of your asses at this very moment? I surely think so.


I would say that is debatable, but then you'll end up yelling some fascist dogma at me and claim that you owned me. I don't even need to bother with conversing with you anymore, I don't tend to hang around racist bigots
-- share what ya got --
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class radiojake
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Tyr on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:49 pm

radiojake wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote: Am I not owning all of your asses at this very moment? I surely think so.


I would say that is debatable, but then you'll end up yelling some fascist dogma at me and claim that you owned me. I don't even need to bother with conversing with you anymore, I don't tend to hang around racist bigots


he hasnt said anything racist yet but give him time
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Cadet Tyr
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:13 pm
Location: Mars

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Moghul on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:53 pm

radiojake wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote: Am I not owning all of your asses at this very moment? I surely think so.


I would say that is debatable, but then you'll end up yelling some fascist dogma at me and claim that you owned me. I don't even need to bother with conversing with you anymore, I don't tend to hang around racist bigots


Although socialism is about abolishing the ownership of the means of production, I think we should also abolish the ownership of asses, just in case the fascists intend to hoard them.
User avatar
Sergeant Moghul
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:04 pm

Postby Tyr on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:56 pm

Tyr wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?





yeah they civilized it by getting rid of all the uncivilized subhumans obviously


However untrue, not a bad idea at all.


now he said something racist
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Cadet Tyr
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:13 pm
Location: Mars

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby muy_thaiguy on Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:01 pm

radiojake wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)


which was stolen from them in the first place
Radio, you know how many different people have done that throughout history? And not just the "evil European/white people," but people of of every race, origin, and ethnicity. The Native Americans constantly fought eachother over land and food and such, and even used slavery in some tribes. I don't see thge Gauls complaining about the Franks or Normans or Romans. Or the Egyptians with the Greeks, Romans, and Arabs. Or Russia from the Mongols and the vikings. Not to mention the tribes of North and South America would constantly invade and absorb eachother.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Skittles! on Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:03 pm

radiojake wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
radiojake wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)


which was stolen from them in the first place


I am curious. What are all those 'treaties' for, if we simply took their land from them? Also, why is it that wherever a white man landed, he is considered to have been an imperialist invader, whereas, all those fucking muzzies, chinks, pakis, niggers etc., moving into white homelands, are considered to be 'immigrants'? Why the differentiation? Fucking liberal morons. You must all love wearing pink.


well because (in the case of the US, and Australia) they were imperialist invaders who took over the running of the entire land, and gave next to nothing back. Australia even had a 'white australia policy' until the 1960's - Pretty weird considering it isn't a white native country.


Don't see any of the race groups you mentioned going to that kind of extreme.

It was actually in the 70's, which is even worse.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14575
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby Der Fuhrer on Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:03 pm

Tyr wrote:
Tyr wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?





yeah they civilized it by getting rid of all the uncivilized subhumans obviously


However untrue, not a bad idea at all.


now he said something racist


Even though I said nothing that even begins to resemble racism, I could care less if it did. f*ck all non-whites. How's that for racism? White Power! How's that?
New Recruit Der Fuhrer
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am

Postby Tyr on Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:05 pm

Der Fuhrer wrote:
Tyr wrote:
Tyr wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?





yeah they civilized it by getting rid of all the uncivilized subhumans obviously


However untrue, not a bad idea at all.




?


now he said something racist


Even though I said nothing that even begins to resemble racism, I could care less if it did. f*ck all non-whites. How's that for racism? White Power! How's that?


how much valium did you take today?
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Cadet Tyr
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:13 pm
Location: Mars

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby radiojake on Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:07 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
radiojake wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)


which was stolen from them in the first place
Radio, you know how many different people have done that throughout history? And not just the "evil European/white people," but people of of every race, origin, and ethnicity. The Native Americans constantly fought eachother over land and food and such, and even used slavery in some tribes. I don't see thge Gauls complaining about the Franks or Normans or Romans. Or the Egyptians with the Greeks, Romans, and Arabs. Or Russia from the Mongols and the vikings. Not to mention the tribes of North and South America would constantly invade and absorb eachother.


So it makes it right then?
-- share what ya got --
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class radiojake
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Re: LAKOTA REVOLUTION

Postby Der Fuhrer on Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:07 pm

Skittles! wrote:
radiojake wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
radiojake wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:(indian resevations land that we tax payers pay for)


which was stolen from them in the first place


I am curious. What are all those 'treaties' for, if we simply took their land from them? Also, why is it that wherever a white man landed, he is considered to have been an imperialist invader, whereas, all those fucking muzzies, chinks, pakis, niggers etc., moving into white homelands, are considered to be 'immigrants'? Why the differentiation? Fucking liberal morons. You must all love wearing pink.


well because (in the case of the US, and Australia) they were imperialist invaders who took over the running of the entire land, and gave next to nothing back. Australia even had a 'white australia policy' until the 1960's - Pretty weird considering it isn't a white native country.


Don't see any of the race groups you mentioned going to that kind of extreme.

It was actually in the 70's, which is even worse.


Australia was not an Aborigine country either. Those fuckers were landed immigrants. Read a little history bitch.
New Recruit Der Fuhrer
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am

Postby Der Fuhrer on Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:08 pm

Tyr wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
Tyr wrote:
Tyr wrote:
Guiscard wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
You do understand that it was fascism that civilised the world yes?





yeah they civilized it by getting rid of all the uncivilized subhumans obviously


However untrue, not a bad idea at all.




?


now he said something racist


Even though I said nothing that even begins to resemble racism, I could care less if it did. f*ck all non-whites. How's that for racism? White Power! How's that?


how much valium did you take today?


After I took over your momma's pussy with my overwrought schlong, I took perhaps 4 of them.
New Recruit Der Fuhrer
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am

Next

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users