Conquer Club

Classic Map with added options

Have an idea for a map? Discuss ideas and concepts here.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Classic Map with added options

Postby premio53 on Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:53 am

Has anyone considered making a classic map with the added options found on the Risk II PC program? The six added territories should be a welcome addition to the smaller classic map. I believe it would be hugely popular.

The newly added territories are:

1. Oikiqtaluk

2. Svalbard

3. Hawaii

4. Falkland Islands

5. New Zealand

6. Philippines
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Postby Gilligan on Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:07 am

Could you tell us where these places would go on the map? Because I've never heard of Oikiqtaluk.
Image
User avatar
Captain Gilligan
 
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Location: Providence, RI

Postby oaktown on Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:31 am

It would seem that Oikiqtaluk is a name that somebody came up with for part of Greenland... we might run into copyright problems if we used it. But the idea of taking the Classic map and adding just a few territories might fly - it would certainly serve to accomodate 7 and 8 player games. The question is how much support would there be for another world map.

In the future ideas for maps that are not accompanied with an actual map of your creation should be included in the map ideas thread.
User avatar
Captain oaktown
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Postby premio53 on Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:32 am

Okikiqtaluk is a territory created between Northwest Territory and Greenland.

Svalard is the territory you find just above Scandinavia and is connected to Scandinavia and Greenland. It can be attacked from Greenland and Scandinavia. It is part of the European continent.

Hawaii is found west of Western United States and can be attacked from Western United States and Japan. It is part of the North American continent.

Philippines is located between Japan and Indonesia and can between attacked from Japan and Indonesia. It is part of the Australian or Oceania territory.

New Zealand is located east of Eastern Australia and can be attacked from
Eastern Australia and Argentina. It is part of Australia or Oceania.

Falkland Islands are located between Argentina and South Africa and can be attacked from Argentina and South Africa. It is part of the South American continent.

The values for the different continents are as follows:

1. North America 6

2. South America 4

3. Europe 6

4. Asia 8

5. Oceania 4

6. Africa 5
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Postby Unit_2 on Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:29 pm

i would like to see this but not in the classic map, i would like to see someone(like you oaktown) do it like the classic map but not the same map.
Image
User avatar
Cook Unit_2
 
Posts: 1834
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A, North America, Earth, Milky Way, Universe.

Postby tim02 on Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:34 pm

I would really look forward to this, but could we have a image just to back it up?
Highest/Current
Score: 2900
User avatar
Colonel tim02
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:51 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby premio53 on Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:05 pm

I don't know how Grand Strategy does it but they use the exact Risk I and Risk II maps on their site. Maybe they have have a deal with Hasbro? You could go there and see what it looks like.
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Re: Classic Map with added options

Postby Blitzaholic on Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:22 pm

premio53 wrote:Has anyone considered making a classic map with the added options found on the Risk II PC program? The six added territories should be a welcome addition to the smaller classic map. I believe it would be hugely popular.

The newly added territories are:

1. Oikiqtaluk

2. Svalbard

3. Hawaii

4. Falkland Islands

5. New Zealand

6. Philippines



you posted this in both 2 different areas?


anyways, like i said, i would keep the original, but also add this as another option, i like it
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby premio53 on Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:31 pm

you posted this in both 2 different areas?

Sorry about that. I am not that familiar with all the different forums.
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Postby whitestazn88 on Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:41 pm

premio53 wrote:I don't know how Grand Strategy does it but they use the exact Risk I and Risk II maps on their site. Maybe they have have a deal with Hasbro? You could go there and see what it looks like.


i believe i speak for most of the ppl on cc when i say that we don't take ideas from grand strategy. thats what they do with our maps
Lieutenant whitestazn88
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: behind you

Postby premio53 on Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:32 am

whitestazn88 wrote:
premio53 wrote:I don't know how Grand Strategy does it but they use the exact Risk I and Risk II maps on their site. Maybe they have have a deal with Hasbro? You could go there and see what it looks like.


i believe i speak for most of the ppl on cc when i say that we don't take ideas from grand strategy. thats what they do with our maps


I agree that Conquer Club is superior and it is the only one I recommend to my friends but the Classic Map as found on the Risk II program is also superior to the old Classic Map in that there is more strategy involved without changing the familiar layout.

The World 2.1 map is OK except sometimes the connected countries can sometimes be confusing and has cost me at least one game because of this. The Classic Map with added territories is clear as the blue sky and has a pleasant look.

As far as stealing ideas from Grand Strategy how is using the same map with the exception of changing Australia to Oceania any different than them using the same layout and not changing it?
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Postby gimil on Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:36 am

I think the exact same classic map (graphically) with these added connectinos and naming in classic 2.0 would be sufficent. 8)
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby tim02 on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:12 am

gimil wrote:I think the exact same classic map (graphically) with these added connectinos and naming in classic 2.0 would be sufficent. 8)


I agree
Highest/Current
Score: 2900
User avatar
Colonel tim02
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:51 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby bryguy on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:14 am

and while your at it, add in the southern sandwich islands

edit: off the southern coast of south america
Corporal bryguy
 
Posts: 4381
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:50 am
Location: Lost in a Jigsaw

Postby premio53 on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:25 am

bryguy wrote:and while your at it, add in the southern sandwich islands

edit: off the southern coast of south america


That might be OK but if too many more are added it could become cluttered. I love it as found on the Risk II program.
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Postby gimil on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:42 am

premio53 wrote:
bryguy wrote:and while your at it, add in the southern sandwich islands

edit: off the southern coast of south america


That might be OK but if too many more are added it could become cluttered. I love it as found on the Risk II program.


could you perhaps get a screen shot for reference?
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby premio53 on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:50 am

gimil wrote:
premio53 wrote:
bryguy wrote:and while your at it, add in the southern sandwich islands

edit: off the southern coast of south america


That might be OK but if too many more are added it could become cluttered. I love it as found on the Risk II program.


could you perhaps get a screen shot for reference?


I believe one can download a trial version of Risk II. You can see it there. It's a beautiful map that doesn't change the familiar Classic layout.
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Postby gimil on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:57 am

premio53 wrote:
gimil wrote:
premio53 wrote:
bryguy wrote:and while your at it, add in the southern sandwich islands

edit: off the southern coast of south america


That might be OK but if too many more are added it could become cluttered. I love it as found on the Risk II program.


could you perhaps get a screen shot for reference?


I believe one can download a trial version of Risk II. You can see it there. It's a beautiful map that doesn't change the familiar Classic layout.


thank you but i dont feel like downloading a game jsut to view hte connections.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby premio53 on Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:58 am

I have no idea how to post anything like that. My computer skills aren't that good.
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Postby Sir. Ricco on Wed Jan 02, 2008 12:15 pm

I really think this is a pointless map. We already have world 2.0. There is no need for this map.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Captain Sir. Ricco
 
Posts: 4555
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Making kingdoms burn and bloodshed start.

Postby premio53 on Wed Jan 02, 2008 12:21 pm

Sir. Ricco wrote:I really think this is a pointless map. We already have world 2.0. There is no need for this map.


I was born in the early 50's and probably most people were familiar with the board game long before the internet came into existence. I believe you would be surprised how popular it would be. It adds much more strategy to the original and would certainly make it more suitable for 7 or 8 players than the Classic now used. It would be a welcome alternative to the World 2.1 which can be confusing at times, at least to me.
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Postby premio53 on Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:19 am

Image


My daughter posted this for me. Hope it works.
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Postby heirware on Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:27 am

Looks good, a middle ground for Classic and World 2.1
Lieutenant heirware
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:54 pm

Postby Risky_Stud on Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:32 am

fun game to play.........i would play this map if it were made for cc! :D
User avatar
Private 1st Class Risky_Stud
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:04 am
Location: Recliner Surfing in my living room

Poll on Classic Map with added variations

Postby premio53 on Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:11 pm

[quote="premio53"]Image


Okikiqtaluk is a territory created between Northwest Territory and Greenland.

Svalard is the territory you find just above Scandinavia and is connected to Scandinavia and Greenland. It can be attacked from Greenland and Scandinavia. It is part of the European continent.

Hawaii is found west of Western United States and can be attacked from Western United States and Japan. It is part of the North American continent.

Philippines is located between Japan and Indonesia and can between attacked from Japan and Indonesia. It is part of the Australian or Oceania territory.

New Zealand is located east of Eastern Australia and can be attacked from
Eastern Australia and Argentina. It is part of Australia or Oceania.

Falkland Islands are located between Argentina and South Africa and can be attacked from Argentina and South Africa. It is part of the South American continent.

The values for the different continents are as follows:

1. North America 6

2. South America 4

3. Europe 6

4. Asia 8

5. Oceania 4

6. Africa 5

With the six added territories it would be a second world map that would be suited for 8 players. The original Classic is too small. Also there would be the familiar layout of the Classic and no confusion as to where one could attack? How many would like to see this?
Lieutenant premio53
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

Next

Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users