There's 1 already and a possible 2nd about to happen(?). (and I played first)
Should I miss my 2nd turn to even things out?
Maybe it's just me.

Moderator: Community Team
ODWO wrote:Is it the norm for players to miss their 1st turns in a paid tournament? Conquer Cup II. (just) Seems kind of like deadbeating. 10554460
There's 1 already and a possible 2nd about to happen(?). (and I played first)
Should I miss my 2nd turn to even things out?
Maybe it's just me.
ODWO wrote:ODWO wrote:Is it the norm for players to miss their 1st turns in a paid tournament? Conquer Cup II. (just) Seems kind of like deadbeating. 10554460
There's 1 already and a possible 2nd about to happen(?). (and I played first)
Should I miss my 2nd turn to even things out?
Maybe it's just me.
Yep. Now 2 or 3 people have missed turns .. myself being the 1st one to play. Game 10554460
So now they get deferred troops, and firepower if/when they do decide to jump back in?
If they miss a 2nd turn, then it's 6 deferred? Ha! I could've played in a public game to see this happen.
Is this "Fair Play" for a "Paid Tournament?"
You are correct, the Conquer Cup is not a speed tournament. From time to time, community-run tournaments may be speed tournaments, but the Conquer Cup for the foreseeable future won't be!noddaclue wrote:This is my first conquer cup game ever. It is NOT a speed game.
While missing turns isn't against the rule, you may put yourself at a disadvantage by not taking your turns, and you may also receive poor ratings from your opponents.I'm confused, hence my name.I've two questions . Are you allowed to skip turns in order to "pile up" troops for disbursement ?
Diplomacy is allowed, as long as it occurs in game chat and not via any other communication channels.Also are treaties allowed in conquer cup tournaments?
Rockerseatrocks wrote:Anyone know what is going on with the round 2 games? I can't see the map and there is a 5th nonexistent player.
Gilligan wrote:Rockerseatrocks wrote:Anyone know what is going on with the round 2 games? I can't see the map and there is a 5th nonexistent player.
lack has been notified.
AndyDufresne wrote:Looks like the Conquer Cup II is trucking along...a couple of speed demon players are already making their way into Round 4!
Hm, I wonder if the next champion will be under the rank of Lieutenant, or over it...or will it be another like jleaux?
--Andy
denominator wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Looks like the Conquer Cup II is trucking along...a couple of speed demon players are already making their way into Round 4!
Hm, I wonder if the next champion will be under the rank of Lieutenant, or over it...or will it be another like jleaux?
--Andy
If jleaux's rank changes, does it update on the Conquer Cup page? Or does that record that he won it as Lieutenant and never change?
AndyDufresne wrote:denominator wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Looks like the Conquer Cup II is trucking along...a couple of speed demon players are already making their way into Round 4!
Hm, I wonder if the next champion will be under the rank of Lieutenant, or over it...or will it be another like jleaux?
--Andy
If jleaux's rank changes, does it update on the Conquer Cup page? Or does that record that he won it as Lieutenant and never change?
I believe the links to his ratings and rank are just like any links in-game from the participant list---I.E. they aren't static, but linked to the latest data.
--Andy
QoH wrote:Wow. I'm never playing in one of these again. The quality of these players is just incredible... incredibly terrible. Both games I was in (lost the first game)progressed further than 5 rounds before someone cashed because no one carded and left spots. The current game has progressed to round 8 and I only have 4 cards, and the spoils are at 8. Completely ridiculous.
QoH wrote:When it was impossible to get a card unless I wanted to attack stacks of 3? Yeah. My strategy might not be the best in multi-player games, but at least I know basic strategies.
denominator wrote:You lost your first game and are complaining that your opponent's strategy was flawed? It seems to me that your strategy is probably the one lacking since you lost. It never ceases to amaze me when high rankers lose a game and they complain that the reason they lost was because their opponent did something unexpected.
drunkmonkey wrote:denominator wrote:You lost your first game and are complaining that your opponent's strategy was flawed? It seems to me that your strategy is probably the one lacking since you lost. It never ceases to amaze me when high rankers lose a game and they complain that the reason they lost was because their opponent did something unexpected.
In fairness, in games like these, it's usually that Player A loses because Player B did something unexpected that gave Player C the win.
denominator wrote:What happens if someone breaks the account sitting rule?
I was away for the long weekend, and my sitter played a turn in Game 10554484 for me. Should I report myself in C&Aor what should I do in this case?
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users