Conquer Club

Deadwood Mafia Its all over! Thanks for playing

Housing completed games. Come take a walk through a history of suspicion!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby lord voldemort on Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:45 am

100 pages on day 2...we need to act or this game is just gonna die
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Postby F1fth on Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:48 am

Koesen wrote:Since we're all listing suspects...

- ExplainThis very likely is an actor and therefore very likely town.
- AD seems to be on the same page as me in many respects, which looks good to me. I interpreted his vote on ET as an accusation of submarining too, but it seems that may just be a difference of playing styles.
- Skoffin: I was about to say she had gone back to her submarining ways, but then she came back and posted something substantial. Given her name claim, I am inclined to trust her for now.
- Diddle: I find his behavior more scummy than not, but his name claim seems solid, thus benefit of the doubt.
- Nagerous: quiet and therefore hard to read, but I agree with most things he said.
I don't think I'll vote for any of these at this point.

- F1fth looks most scummy to me at this point. I find his reasoning throughout the thread unconvincing and over the top, both when he's defending people and when he's attacking them.
- Iliad comes in second in the Scummy Top Whatever. The fact that he sort of backed off after my reply to his accusations pleads for him, but it might just be a strategic acknowledgement that my lynch isn't going to happen and that pursuing it would draw unwanted attention to him.
These two I'll vote for if there is a chance of lynching them.

- Talapus, Crab, Sierra Leon, Mandy and Brown-ng: various degrees of possibly scummy vibes, but no real proof against any of them.
These are lynches that I might support to end the day, but they're not my first choice.

The rest of you, I don't really have an idea about.


Wow, you must be pretty special to think that anybody would accuse you of being scum is scummy themselves. Notice how I'm your #1 and I've also been the one to make the best points about your scumminess? Iliad accused you and now he's #2?

You've still done nothing to disprove the fact that you look scummy except call me scummy.

Anyway, I agree with the "Clive = Idiot, Idiot =/= Scum" group. As annoying as it is to see him vote for someone just because someone else did, and he doesn't like the person, it's still not reason enough to lynch him with no apparent deadline in sight.
<>---------------------------<>
......Come play CC Mafia,
.....where happiness lies
<>----------[Link]----------<>

REMEMBER NORSE // REMEMBER DANCING MUSTARD
User avatar
Corporal F1fth
 
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:15 am

Postby kwanton on Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:09 am

nagerous wrote:A vote on clive will just be another wasted lynch? Anyone who suggests lynching him or diddle is coming accross as quite scummy as it will just means we've wasted the day and the progress we've made. Thats partly why I'm considering dropping a vote on talapus, purely because he would rather lynch the idiots as opposed to the potential scums.

Anyways, I'm happy lynching tal, mandy, brown or crab today. They are my favourites for the chop. Also, sierra is playing the role of overly helpful townie considering the amount of spare time he appears to have that he can evaluate every comment I've made in this game. The fact hes pushing against me however, makes me naturally suspicious of him and his real motives. Also, the thing he actually accused me for I feel naturally justified in as I will always push for claims before someone is lynched and make sure people don't hammer before the claim etc.


Everyone! Listen to nag. This is pretty much what I said before but better put.
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby Koesen on Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:17 am

F1fth wrote: You've still done nothing to disprove the fact that you look scummy except call me scummy.


I have dedicated several long posts to explaining all of my so called suspicious actions. The fact that you have managed to miss all of them them does nothing to reduce my suspicion of you.

It's not about you voting for me. Brown-ng voted me too and he's not very high on my list of suspects. Another little fact that you conveniently ignore in your witch hunt against me.

It's about the way you are going after me. You have not a shred of evidence against me. I responded to every single accusation thrown against me, to the satisfacting of the overwhelming majority of players. You simply pretend that didn't happen.

It is you who doesn't do anything to disprove suspicion. I asked you and others who thought I shouldn't go after people what your pro town alternative was. No answer. You want to let the submariners submarine, although you know that town will suffer for it.

I pointed out that when people come with a convincing claim, I unvote. Unlike you who voted not just once but twice for a townie with a convincing claim, and then refused to look at his bandwagon because you are so sure there is no evidence there at all. :roll:

I don't have as much of an impression of you as a mafia player as of, say, Mandy, but the rigid and unreasonable behavior you are displaying in this game doesn't fit the image that I do have of you. And in my experience, when usually reasonable people are suddenly hellbent on lynching someone for no reason, they're often scum.

Vote F1fth
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
User avatar
Sergeant Koesen
 
Posts: 1937
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Muskoka, Ontario

Postby CrabNebula on Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:02 am

Skittles! wrote:Jester?


Why does it happen that whenever someone acts unusually odd (scummy odd more like), someone brings up "JESTER!"?
rebelman wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thats why my next wife will be a player from this site. I wont mention who :wink:
obviously you are looking for a woman thats a good cook and likes you to dominate in one on one
Sergeant 1st Class CrabNebula
 
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:19 pm

Postby Koesen on Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:22 am

Because lynching a jester is the worst way to end a game.
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
User avatar
Sergeant Koesen
 
Posts: 1937
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Muskoka, Ontario

Postby nagerous on Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:25 am

I have never seen the lynch of a jester end the game.


Also, if gimpy made respectable settings this game probably doesn't have jester settings. Speaking from a failed jester three times, lets just drop the jester talk.
User avatar
Captain nagerous
 
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:39 am

Postby CrabNebula on Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:03 pm

Koesen wrote:Because lynching a jester is the worst way to end a game.


I'd rather have Jester win than mafia!
rebelman wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thats why my next wife will be a player from this site. I wont mention who :wink:
obviously you are looking for a woman thats a good cook and likes you to dominate in one on one
Sergeant 1st Class CrabNebula
 
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:19 pm

Postby mandalorian2298 on Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:00 pm

CrabNebula wrote:
Koesen wrote:Because lynching a jester is the worst way to end a game.


I'd rather have Jester win than mafia!


You would rather lose then lose? :?

Anyways, I agree with Nagerus' list of suspects. I don't buy browng's Mayor claim and I don't believe that Mayor brovng is a good thing for the Town anyway (he has equal chances of blocking a Scum lynch as he has of blocking the Town Lynch). So lynch browng, cocksuckers and if he is pro-Town, you can lynch the next candidate on Nag's list (AKA as me) 8) tommorow.
Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore.

Image

Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
User avatar
Lieutenant mandalorian2298
 
Posts: 4536
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: www.chess.com

Postby CrabNebula on Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:15 pm

Actually its diddle who claimed Mayor not browng.
rebelman wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thats why my next wife will be a player from this site. I wont mention who :wink:
obviously you are looking for a woman thats a good cook and likes you to dominate in one on one
Sergeant 1st Class CrabNebula
 
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:19 pm

Postby Koesen on Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:31 pm

CrabNebula wrote:Actually its diddle who claimed Mayor not browng.


That is correct, but I bet that from Mandy's point of view, it means there's even less reason not to lynch him :)
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
User avatar
Sergeant Koesen
 
Posts: 1937
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Muskoka, Ontario

Postby ExplainThis on Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:00 pm

@diddle, then ask now please.

@nagerous, Ive given up trying to place that avatar who are you on other forums?

@lord 100 pages at 9 ppp for a game this size is about or less then a regular day one from where I started playing I hardly see it killing the game (now 2 month day 1's those kill games)

@ad point out the question(s) I have yet to answer or unvote me, or at least admit you have no reason to vote me.
Private ExplainThis
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:37 am

Postby gimpyThewonder on Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:29 pm

ok you cocksuckers there is 1 week left for this day (I did say a 2 week max on days). Don't feel rushed or anything, just letting ya know.

Also my grandmother is in town visiting so i will be able to do less votecounts (ie don't expect them daily)
"You see stars that are clear, have been dead for years…
But the idea, just lives on…" ~ Bright Eyes
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class gimpyThewonder
 
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: the PNW

Postby Anarkistsdream on Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:48 pm

ExplainThis wrote:@diddle, then ask now please.

@nagerous, Ive given up trying to place that avatar who are you on other forums?

@lord 100 pages at 9 ppp for a game this size is about or less then a regular day one from where I started playing I hardly see it killing the game (now 2 month day 1's those kill games)

@ad point out the question(s) I have yet to answer or unvote me, or at least admit you have no reason to vote me.


I went back to quote the question and talk shit to you, and then I realized you already did and I missed it.

:oops:

Unvote
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
Cook Anarkistsdream
 
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am

Postby lord voldemort on Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:13 pm

10 ppp. and usually a whole game is a goood 130 odd pages....day 2 and we are 102...this is unusually long for this site.
nagerous doesnt do other forums btw...thought id answer for him
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Postby Koesen on Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:16 pm

I'd like some of the quiet people to contribute more. Russianfire, Pancake, LSU, Lalaland...

I'm not saying you're all scum and I'm sure some of you have good reasons, but the fact is that those of us who do most of the talking can only go so far by ourselves, and the game would benefit from more activity.

I think we've reached a point where, unless there's some fresh input, the game is going to stall.
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
User avatar
Sergeant Koesen
 
Posts: 1937
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:11 am
Location: Muskoka, Ontario

Postby nagerous on Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:35 pm

The dog avatar lol is taken straight from msn.
User avatar
Captain nagerous
 
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:39 am

Postby pancakemix on Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:24 pm

Since a reply has been requested and I've taken care of my other duties, I'll post now. Additions below.

Koesen wrote:Since we're all listing suspects...

- ExplainThis very likely is an actor and therefore very likely town.


Agreed. But of course, people here are crazy, and will change anything for a twist. We can't let our guard down.

- AD seems to be on the same page as me in many respects, which looks good to me. I interpreted his vote on ET as an accusation of submarining too, but it seems that may just be a difference of playing styles.


I agree that that might have been what he was thinking, but unless AD says anything, I don't know.

One thing I will say: I know how much AD hates submarining, but he might be overdoing it a bit. Scum makes up a minority of players in a game unless you have a crazy game (See TRUAMGOT I), and I don't think this is a crazy game. So if scum is 5 people out of 30 (16%) and there are 6 submariners with 1 person trying to whip everyone into shape, what are the chances, in a random draw, that 1 of those submariners is scum? What are the chances that the whipper is scum?

I'm not condemning the practice of whipping submariners, I'm just not sure about AD's intents, so Mini FOS AD

- Diddle: I find his behavior more scummy than not, but his name claim seems solid, thus benefit of the doubt.


Like I said earlier, if he doesn't care, forget about him. Gimpy's got enough trouble replacing people already. BTW, Mod, prods would be a good idea.

- Nagerous: quiet and therefore hard to read, but I agree with most things he said.I don't think I'll vote for any of these at this point.


I agree, too little to tell, but since he, as I understand, was away, it's excused, and since then, he's said some good things.

- Iliad comes in second in the Scummy Top Whatever. The fact that he sort of backed off after my reply to his accusations pleads for him, but it might just be a strategic acknowledgment that my lynch isn't going to happen and that pursuing it would draw unwanted attention to him.


This quote makes you sound pretty confident in your townieness, Koesen. I recall someone saying something to the effect that you were leading the inquisition. Remember, people, last time we let Koesen lead the inquisition,he screwed us over. :lol: :wink:

Joking aside, I don't think we can trust Koesen entirely until there's conclusive proof. And you can't actually get 100% conclusive proof. I'm not saying don't trust him, just make sure you're sure about him.

- Talapus, Crab, Sierra Leon, Mandy and Brown-ng: various degrees of possibly scummy vibes, but no real proof against any of them.


Talapus, as I said earlier, needs to back off on the stupidwagons.

Brown, I've also addressed earlier. I'll also support a lynch for him given the opportunity.

Sierra, I think is overanalyzing people. Analysis is good, but highlighting details that don't matter to you? That's a bit much.

Crab and Mandy I haven't picked up much on, which is odd, especially for mandy. I'd watch him.

That's about all I have to say for now. If you have any questions, PM me so I can report you to the mod for breaking the rules and get you modkilled for being dumb.
Epic Win

"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class pancakemix
 
Posts: 7973
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: The Grim Guzzler

Postby ExplainThis on Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:52 pm

pancakemix wrote:Since a reply has been requested and I've taken care of my other duties, I'll post now. Additions below.

Koesen wrote:Since we're all listing suspects...

- ExplainThis very likely is an actor and therefore very likely town.


Agreed. But of course, people here are crazy, and will change anything for a twist. We can't let our guard down.

- AD seems to be on the same page as me in many respects, which looks good to me. I interpreted his vote on ET as an accusation of submarining too, but it seems that may just be a difference of playing styles.


I agree that that might have been what he was thinking, but unless AD says anything, I don't know.

One thing I will say: I know how much AD hates submarining, but he might be overdoing it a bit. Scum makes up a minority of players in a game unless you have a crazy game (See TRUAMGOT I), and I don't think this is a crazy game. So if scum is 5 people out of 30 (16%) and there are 6 submariners with 1 person trying to whip everyone into shape, what are the chances, in a random draw, that 1 of those submariners is scum? What are the chances that the whipper is scum?

I'm not condemning the practice of whipping submariners, I'm just not sure about AD's intents, so Mini FOS AD

- Diddle: I find his behavior more scummy than not, but his name claim seems solid, thus benefit of the doubt.


Like I said earlier, if he doesn't care, forget about him. Gimpy's got enough trouble replacing people already. BTW, Mod, prods would be a good idea.

- Nagerous: quiet and therefore hard to read, but I agree with most things he said.I don't think I'll vote for any of these at this point.


I agree, too little to tell, but since he, as I understand, was away, it's excused, and since then, he's said some good things.

- Iliad comes in second in the Scummy Top Whatever. The fact that he sort of backed off after my reply to his accusations pleads for him, but it might just be a strategic acknowledgment that my lynch isn't going to happen and that pursuing it would draw unwanted attention to him.


This quote makes you sound pretty confident in your townieness, Koesen. I recall someone saying something to the effect that you were leading the inquisition. Remember, people, last time we let Koesen lead the inquisition,he screwed us over. :lol: :wink:

Joking aside, I don't think we can trust Koesen entirely until there's conclusive proof. And you can't actually get 100% conclusive proof. I'm not saying don't trust him, just make sure you're sure about him.

- Talapus, Crab, Sierra Leon, Mandy and Brown-ng: various degrees of possibly scummy vibes, but no real proof against any of them.


Talapus, as I said earlier, needs to back off on the stupidwagons.

Brown, I've also addressed earlier. I'll also support a lynch for him given the opportunity.

Sierra, I think is overanalyzing people. Analysis is good, but highlighting details that don't matter to you? That's a bit much.

Crab and Mandy I haven't picked up much on, which is odd, especially for mandy. I'd watch him.

That's about all I have to say for now. If you have any questions, PM me so I can report you to the mod for breaking the rules and get you modkilled for being dumb.


^someone who actually sounds like he's played mafia before^ (no offense to everyone else here)
Private ExplainThis
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:37 am

Postby gimpyThewonder on Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:08 pm

i'll try to get some prods out there in the next few days
"You see stars that are clear, have been dead for years…
But the idea, just lives on…" ~ Bright Eyes
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class gimpyThewonder
 
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: the PNW

Postby LSU Tiger Josh on Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:50 pm

Ok I just got done rereading all of Day 2. My initial thoughts were that BrownG, Fifth, and Iliad are the scummiest of that group. Knowing how the game was progressing and how day 1 went down, I have for the most part felt pretty comfortible in that Koesen was town as he was along the same wave length for many thoughts I have had while rereading this mess. While Fifth does the focus on Koesen so far, I don't think he is the scummiest on this day. I believe that falls on BrownG who hasn't really helped much in this game other then follow Fifth around like a lap dog. Unvote Vote BrownG for this behavior. Iliad I still don't see why you're so focused on going after Koesen, but if BrownG or Fifth turn up as scum, you'll also be on my list for scumminess. Kwanton I'm glad to see is actually trying to contribute now although I'm still suspicious of him.
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
Corporal LSU Tiger Josh
 
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Louisiana

Postby kwanton on Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:48 am

Currently I'll also have to agree with those suspicious of mandy. Only slightly though. It seems he hasn't taken control of the game like he usually tries to do. Maybe it's cuz no one has actually made a strong enough argument against him to draw him out. Ah well, I think at this point we should just point out any odd behavior and see where it leads us. Maybe it'll help us with a lead or two.
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby Iliad on Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:59 am

Koesen wrote:Since we're all listing suspects...

- ExplainThis very likely is an actor and therefore very likely town.
- AD seems to be on the same page as me in many respects, which looks good to me. I interpreted his vote on ET as an accusation of submarining too, but it seems that may just be a difference of playing styles.
- Skoffin: I was about to say she had gone back to her submarining ways, but then she came back and posted something substantial. Given her name claim, I am inclined to trust her for now.
- Diddle: I find his behavior more scummy than not, but his name claim seems solid, thus benefit of the doubt.
- Nagerous: quiet and therefore hard to read, but I agree with most things he said.
I don't think I'll vote for any of these at this point.

- F1fth looks most scummy to me at this point. I find his reasoning throughout the thread unconvincing and over the top, both when he's defending people and when he's attacking them.
- Iliad comes in second in the Scummy Top Whatever. The fact that he sort of backed off after my reply to his accusations pleads for him, but it might just be a strategic acknowledgement that my lynch isn't going to happen and that pursuing it would draw unwanted attention to him.
These two I'll vote for if there is a chance of lynching them.

- Talapus, Crab, Sierra Leon, Mandy and Brown-ng: various degrees of possibly scummy vibes, but no real proof against any of them.
These are lynches that I might support to end the day, but they're not my first choice.

The rest of you, I don't really have an idea about.
When I read it it looked scummy because I was reading with biased POV. Then you explained yourself and I with an unbiased POV unvoted.

I fail to see how that is scummy
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Postby Iliad on Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:00 am

Koesen wrote:Because lynching a jester is the worst way to end a game.
it doesn't end the game, the game continues unless it's really small
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Postby Iliad on Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:02 am

ExplainThis wrote:
pancakemix wrote:Since a reply has been requested and I've taken care of my other duties, I'll post now. Additions below.

Koesen wrote:Since we're all listing suspects...

- ExplainThis very likely is an actor and therefore very likely town.


Agreed. But of course, people here are crazy, and will change anything for a twist. We can't let our guard down.

- AD seems to be on the same page as me in many respects, which looks good to me. I interpreted his vote on ET as an accusation of submarining too, but it seems that may just be a difference of playing styles.


I agree that that might have been what he was thinking, but unless AD says anything, I don't know.

One thing I will say: I know how much AD hates submarining, but he might be overdoing it a bit. Scum makes up a minority of players in a game unless you have a crazy game (See TRUAMGOT I), and I don't think this is a crazy game. So if scum is 5 people out of 30 (16%) and there are 6 submariners with 1 person trying to whip everyone into shape, what are the chances, in a random draw, that 1 of those submariners is scum? What are the chances that the whipper is scum?

I'm not condemning the practice of whipping submariners, I'm just not sure about AD's intents, so Mini FOS AD

- Diddle: I find his behavior more scummy than not, but his name claim seems solid, thus benefit of the doubt.


Like I said earlier, if he doesn't care, forget about him. Gimpy's got enough trouble replacing people already. BTW, Mod, prods would be a good idea.

- Nagerous: quiet and therefore hard to read, but I agree with most things he said.I don't think I'll vote for any of these at this point.


I agree, too little to tell, but since he, as I understand, was away, it's excused, and since then, he's said some good things.

- Iliad comes in second in the Scummy Top Whatever. The fact that he sort of backed off after my reply to his accusations pleads for him, but it might just be a strategic acknowledgment that my lynch isn't going to happen and that pursuing it would draw unwanted attention to him.


This quote makes you sound pretty confident in your townieness, Koesen. I recall someone saying something to the effect that you were leading the inquisition. Remember, people, last time we let Koesen lead the inquisition,he screwed us over. :lol: :wink:

Joking aside, I don't think we can trust Koesen entirely until there's conclusive proof. And you can't actually get 100% conclusive proof. I'm not saying don't trust him, just make sure you're sure about him.

- Talapus, Crab, Sierra Leon, Mandy and Brown-ng: various degrees of possibly scummy vibes, but no real proof against any of them.


Talapus, as I said earlier, needs to back off on the stupidwagons.

Brown, I've also addressed earlier. I'll also support a lynch for him given the opportunity.

Sierra, I think is overanalyzing people. Analysis is good, but highlighting details that don't matter to you? That's a bit much.

Crab and Mandy I haven't picked up much on, which is odd, especially for mandy. I'd watch him.

That's about all I have to say for now. If you have any questions, PM me so I can report you to the mod for breaking the rules and get you modkilled for being dumb.


^someone who actually sounds like he's played mafia before^ (no offense to everyone else here)
yeah just say that we all can't play mafia, but no offense :roll:
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

PreviousNext

Return to Mafia Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users