Scott-Land wrote:Fruitcake wrote:kyusskam wrote:ok, stupid question...
why would someone want to "point dump"?
Multiple reasons. It could be to enjoy stripping senior ranks of high points when ambushing their games, it could be the enjoyment of rising again etc etc.
Regarding the philosophy of point dumping, I cannot see how anyone could have a problem with it, it is perfectly allowable, and actually does a lot of good. It reverses the inherent flow of points momentarily. It gives people a good feeling should they rise in rank...if they are not actually that good, they will quickly lose them again to more deserving types, so those points will ultimately end up where they should be. It levels the playing field and adds to the frission of who one takes on...
I am staggered at poohs suggestion, it reeks of elitism, something I cannot abide (for all my tongue in cheek remarks to the contrary).
Your opinion is highly flawed here Fruit- if those were indeed the reasons, all is required is a pm to an admin for a point reset. There would be no abuse of the system nor abuse from the players that join to scrape off a few extra points. Although there may be 'enjoyment of rising again' but that's after the fact. It has no bearing on why they did it. If you take a look at all the players that Fble mentioned, they were all high ranks- guys that wanted to stay on top and due to the pressure cracked. Those that point dump, do because of their inability to maintain a desired rank.
Yet another example of how 1 vs 1s are grossly abused- if it were not for the game type, you'd rarely ever see this happening.
I PM'd the admins for a point reset and it wasn't granted... I just lost all mine in doodle assassins by playing stupidly... aka deploying at the beginning of the round and autoing my target's first territory... something that most players do... so as a result I ended up losing 7/8 of the games and plummeting. It's not too hard to win them actually, I was winning about 40%, KG said he managed to win 40-45% of them, and skillerman said he was managing 50%.