Moderator: Cartographers
whitestazn88 wrote:i still don't like how the names fit inside the territs...
ZeakCytho wrote:It looks like part of the Danube Delta territory covers the Black Sea? I'd redraw the borders so they hug the coastline.
ZeakCytho wrote:Could you take the continent names from the main map and put them on the minimap instead? I think they'd fit better and be more legible there.
foregone wrote:ZeakCytho wrote:It looks like part of the Danube Delta territory covers the Black Sea? I'd redraw the borders so they hug the coastline.
Not sure what you mean there, sorry. There isn't any space between the border and the territory there at the mo?
foregone wrote:ZeakCytho wrote:Could you take the continent names from the main map and put them on the minimap instead? I think they'd fit better and be more legible there.
I had it like this before (v8.5, pg5) but how it is currently was preferred. Take a look and tell me if you prefer the old way and I can maybe try that again. One of the problems is the length of the names of the continents as they stick out off the minimap as well.
ZeakCytho wrote:foregone wrote:ZeakCytho wrote:It looks like part of the Danube Delta territory covers the Black Sea? I'd redraw the borders so they hug the coastline.
Not sure what you mean there, sorry. There isn't any space between the border and the territory there at the mo?
My apologies. I thought part of the territory overlapped the Black Sea water, but after checking with a Google Maps satellite image, I see this is not the case. Ignore this comment.
ZeakCytho wrote:foregone wrote:ZeakCytho wrote:Could you take the continent names from the main map and put them on the minimap instead? I think they'd fit better and be more legible there.
I had it like this before (v8.5, pg5) but how it is currently was preferred. Take a look and tell me if you prefer the old way and I can maybe try that again. One of the problems is the length of the names of the continents as they stick out off the minimap as well.
I do think I prefer that style to the current one - if other people disagree, though, I guess keep it the way it is.
Ruben Cassar wrote:Also I think it should be Moldavia and not Moldovia.
Ruben Cassar wrote:I would opt for Bucuresti and not Bucharest since all your other names are in Romanian.
Ruben Cassar wrote:Sorry to come in so late, but some of the central colours are a bit too similar to distinguish, Maybe you could try some different tones?
DiM wrote:first of all i love the look and feel of the map. congrats for that.
there are minor spelling issues that have probably been already covered. if not here they are:
Moldova instead of Moldovia
BucureČti instead of Bucharest
MaramureČ instead of Maramures
Delta DunÄrii instead of Danube Delta
about the graphics i like the choice of colours and the parchment theme but i think you should go a bit further and add even more finesse details:
1. folding marks
2. curled corners
3. jagged margins (as if the map is so old it started tearing at the edges)
4. a darker appearance
here's a sample of what i mean (without curled corners and jagged edges cause i don't have time to do those right now)
ZeakCytho wrote:Could you darken the entire map a shade? Or bump the contrast up. Not much, but a little.
Also, consider adding a drop shadow under the paper so it looks like it's sitting on top of the wood. This is especially needed around the curled up edges.
oaktown wrote:this is looking very nice foregone. I'm liking this map!
As you have probably figured out by now, I love antique maps so I love the old parchment style of the map, but it is possible to look too weathered - we still need to be able to make out borders and names or it will be frustrating to play. Right now my eyes are straining to make out the playable aspects of the map. Little stuff that i think would make play easier:Other than where visuals interfere with playability, I don't have any concerns with the gameplay. Seems balanced and should be fun to play.
- The entire Dobrogea region seems to have been washed out to the point htat it no longer looks like playable area anymore; it gets lost in the legend and unplayable map border. And it's hard to tell what's going on with the borders of the terits in that region.
- Much of your text is looking a bit too faded, in my opinion. Especially in the small version it is tough to read the region names, legend text, and some territory names.
- Buzau's title seems like it would be better up higher - right now it seems to cross a border unnecessarily, and since Buzau seems to change color in the middle of the territory it's a bit muddled in through there. In fact, in general there are a lot of territory titles that can come off borders.
- The new border between Brasov and Buzau could use perhaps a bit less grunge to make it obvious - with the markings and stains in there, it could be missed.
foregone wrote:Updates:Mainly, I worked on the grunge factor. Did it a little differently to attempt to ensure that it doesn't muck with the clarity overly. The coloration is mildly different for the grunge layer and the amount of age "noise" is slightly less.
Moved territory names off borders. One or two of them still hit border, mainly to ensure space for army numbers on the small map.
Darkened the territory names and the inner borders on the small map, to make sure they are still clear on it.
Tried some drop shadows around the edge of the map but it didn't really look good in my opinion. I want it to look flatish on the table, rather than lifted off. Does anyone else feel strongly about the need for shadows?
foregone wrote:Main question: Does it look old yet clear enough for gameplay?
yeti_c wrote:If you look at DiM's version - the territory names & borders are really a lot darker - and I think that helps?!
C.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users