Moderator: Community Team
a.sub wrote:or if you posted that in the Hot + Sexy + NSFW thread ...
Snorri1234 wrote:a.sub wrote:or if you posted that in the Hot + Sexy + NSFW thread ...
Well that's a valid complaint. I wouldn't call it bigotry but it's a joke in bad taste.
But you can't claim that the picture is a goddess in a degraded form. Because it is not.
AAFitz wrote:Again, one might consider the very act of one dressing up as their deity to be degradation.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
AAFitz wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:a.sub wrote:or if you posted that in the Hot + Sexy + NSFW thread ...
Well that's a valid complaint. I wouldn't call it bigotry but it's a joke in bad taste.
But you can't claim that the picture is a goddess in a degraded form. Because it is not.
Again, one might consider the very act of one dressing up as their deity to be degradation.
a.sub wrote:K i will admit the gore was be being nit picky to justify my self in as many ways as i can
But posting her in that thread was the part that got me
Im even Ok with people questioning the religion as a whole, but i found that to be going to far
a.sub wrote:K i will admit the gore was be being nit picky to justify my self in as many ways as i can
But posting her in that thread was the part that got me
Im even Ok with people questioning the religion as a whole, but i found that to be going to far
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
a.sub wrote:K i will admit the gore was be being nit picky to justify my self in as many ways as i can
But posting her in that thread was the part that got me
Im even Ok with people questioning the religion as a whole, but i found that to be going to far
DevilDuck wrote:Hot Goddess...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
jonesthecurl wrote:a.sub wrote:K i will admit the gore was be being nit picky to justify my self in as many ways as i can
But posting her in that thread was the part that got me
Im even Ok with people questioning the religion as a whole, but i found that to be going to far
Is Kali not meant to be "hot"?
In fact is much of Hindu holy art not meant to be erotic?
a.sub wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:a.sub wrote:K i will admit the gore was be being nit picky to justify my self in as many ways as i can
But posting her in that thread was the part that got me
Im even Ok with people questioning the religion as a whole, but i found that to be going to far
Is Kali not meant to be "hot"?
In fact is much of Hindu holy art not meant to be erotic?
no
and
no
a.sub wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:a.sub wrote:K i will admit the gore was be being nit picky to justify my self in as many ways as i can
But posting her in that thread was the part that got me
Im even Ok with people questioning the religion as a whole, but i found that to be going to far
Is Kali not meant to be "hot"?
In fact is much of Hindu holy art not meant to be erotic?
no
and
no
a.sub wrote:Kali is not meant to be hot, she is simply supposed to be a beautiful form of god. I would like to point out that those are two different things entirely.
and Hinduism is NOT meant to be erotic at all
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
a.sub wrote:Kali is not meant to be hot, she is simply supposed to be a beautiful form of god. I would like to point out that those are two different things entirely.
and Hinduism is NOT meant to be erotic at all
jonesthecurl wrote:a.sub wrote:Kali is not meant to be hot, she is simply supposed to be a beautiful form of god. I would like to point out that those are two different things entirely.
and Hinduism is NOT meant to be erotic at all
Here are some photos of lots of Hindu sculpture.
Be warned, A,Sub would appear to be worng, and I apologise for posting a link to rude things here, but this is simpley to point out how wrong he is.
I would be happy for mods to remove the link, and people who wish to pursue the question to google something along the lines of "erotic hindu art".
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
cyrenius wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:a.sub wrote:Kali is not meant to be hot, she is simply supposed to be a beautiful form of god. I would like to point out that those are two different things entirely.
and Hinduism is NOT meant to be erotic at all
Here are some photos of lots of Hindu sculpture.
Be warned, A,Sub would appear to be worng, and I apologise for posting a link to rude things here, but this is simpley to point out how wrong he is.
I would be happy for mods to remove the link, and people who wish to pursue the question to google something along the lines of "erotic hindu art".
He is right, hinduism gave us Kama Sutra, a lot of beautiful erotic art, and a transfigured vision of sexuality.I personaly I'm greatfull for it.A.sub I don't know why are you ashemed of it?
And yes, Kali is beautiful,she's gorgeous, she's divine.Some people say's "hot" meaning beautyfull
Maybe we are a bit confused.Is Tantra a part of the Hinduism?
jonesthecurl wrote:a.sub wrote:K i will admit the gore was be being nit picky to justify my self in as many ways as i can
But posting her in that thread was the part that got me
Im even Ok with people questioning the religion as a whole, but i found that to be going to far
Is Kali not meant to be "hot"?
In fact is much of Hindu holy art not meant to be erotic?
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Where's the link? I think we need some great masterbation material for this thread!
Clapper, you obviously crossed the line, with your authority.
....and a.sub needs to learn more about Hindu sex manuals. It wouldn't hurt, unless you don't have permission from your farm animals.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users