Moderator: Community Team
mibi wrote:There is a script for this.
Georgerx7di wrote:mibi wrote:There is a script for this.
Other than the dice analyzer? One that counts rolls won and lost?
Timminz wrote:Georgerx7di wrote:mibi wrote:There is a script for this.
Other than the dice analyzer? One that counts rolls won and lost?
No. The dice analyzer gives you this.
Georgerx7di wrote:
Oh, I guess I need to change my suggestion then. I am a little old school though. I was going to suggest that people use a chisel and stone tablet, but I figured nobody would go for it; so I went modern and suggested paper instead.
captainwalrus wrote:Yeah but having them do it by hand makes them realize that it is not worth it so they should just shut up and deal.
qwert wrote:Did dice analyzer,can analized missed logs to?
Georgerx7di wrote:One more reason for people to do this on paper. It would force a person to recognize the times when they go 6-0 or 10-0, which people never seem to mention in their dice threads.
sully800 wrote:Georgerx7di wrote:One more reason for people to do this on paper. It would force a person to recognize the times when they go 6-0 or 10-0, which people never seem to mention in their dice threads.
But those are good outcomes George, why would we complain about them?
Timminz wrote:Georgerx7di wrote:mibi wrote:There is a script for this.
Other than the dice analyzer? One that counts rolls won and lost?
No. The dice analyzer gives you this.
edit- here it is.
xelabale wrote:Timminz wrote:Georgerx7di wrote:mibi wrote:There is a script for this.
Other than the dice analyzer? One that counts rolls won and lost?
No. The dice analyzer gives you this.
edit- here it is.
According to that you've attacked 1vs2 624 times. Would you like a game?
Timminz wrote:xelabale wrote:Timminz wrote:Georgerx7di wrote:mibi wrote:There is a script for this.
Other than the dice analyzer? One that counts rolls won and lost?
No. The dice analyzer gives you this.
edit- here it is.
According to that you've attacked 1vs2 624 times. Would you like a game?
I have indeed, but perhaps you missed that I win 1v2 a whole 0.78% more than is statistically expected.
Pedronicus wrote:Battle Outcomes Actual Stats Ideal Stats
3v2 15103 / 13509 / 11876 (37.3% / 33.37% / 29.33%) (37.17% / 33.58% / 29.26%)
3v1 16915 / 8850 (65.65% / 34.35%) (65.97% / 34.03%)
2v2 166 / 207 / 307 (24.41% / 30.44% / 45.15%) (22.76% / 32.41% / 44.83%)
2v1 1509 / 1092 (58.02% / 41.98%) (57.87% / 42.13%)
1v2 33 / 135 (19.64% / 80.36%) (25.46% / 74.54%)
1v1 491 / 725 (40.38% / 59.62%) (41.67% / 58.33%)
Robinette wrote:The only thing worse than dice complainers...
Are people who complain about the complainers...
My god, those people, like george, are the worst kind of complainers EVER,,,
and it drives me insane... i'm sure you all agree, well... unless you're not a complainer...
but still... you can see why i am complaining about this, right?
trinicardinal wrote:Robinette wrote:The only thing worse than dice complainers...
Are people who complain about the complainers...
My god, those people, like george, are the worst kind of complainers EVER,,,
and it drives me insane... i'm sure you all agree, well... unless you're not a complainer...
but still... you can see why i am complaining about this, right?
Hey who can complain with that logic...![]()
![]()
unless you're a complainer that is
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users