Moderator: Cartographers
Enigma wrote:ok i read through page 6 and got boredso if someone has already said this correct me-
but it seems that if you code all of the possibilities, if a person gets a 4x5 rectangle they will get a +40 bonus. thats insane...and you said as much at the bottom of the legend.
but it seems impossible not to have that occur. if you promise a +2 bonus for every possible 4 in a row, then the coding is going to have to include all of the possibilities. and unless there are a multitude of "if __ bonus then not ___ bonus," like, 2 conditionals for every single possible line of 4, then the bonus will automatically be granted.
i hope this makes sense. im saying it from my understanding of xml code, and a fellow mathematically oriented mind. correct me if im wrong- i hope i am. id love to play this map.
sully800 wrote:Enigma wrote:ok i read through page 6 and got boredso if someone has already said this correct me-
but it seems that if you code all of the possibilities, if a person gets a 4x5 rectangle they will get a +40 bonus. thats insane...and you said as much at the bottom of the legend.
but it seems impossible not to have that occur. if you promise a +2 bonus for every possible 4 in a row, then the coding is going to have to include all of the possibilities. and unless there are a multitude of "if __ bonus then not ___ bonus," like, 2 conditionals for every single possible line of 4, then the bonus will automatically be granted.
i hope this makes sense. im saying it from my understanding of xml code, and a fellow mathematically oriented mind. correct me if im wrong- i hope i am. id love to play this map.
Did you read the part about a +2 bonus for each 4 in a row, a -2 for each 5 in a row and a +2 for each 7 in a row? That simplifies everything so that each unique 4 in a row produces a single bonus (ie 5 in a row doesn't count as two)
And I believe the XML is finished.
AndyDufresne wrote:Lastly, if you can...try fitting the CC star in there...perhaps on either side of the phrase 'Bonus Guide'.
yeti_c wrote:
if it was 59,4 than we did not have 60% and 39,5 rounds up...
KEYOGI wrote:It's already been discussed. Go back and read Guiscard's posts on page 7.
Guiscard wrote:
The 'two bonuses can only share a single space' is confusing though...if you have the +20 do you also get the +14?
I think it's pretty straightforward. If you have four in a row you get +2 for each combo. You would only get the +20.
Guiscard wrote:
Would it not be simpler (and more in keeping with the game) to just give a +1 or +2 for every complete row of four you hold in any direction, but spaces can't overlap as a bonus. For example if you held the +20 example you would get +8, if you held the +10 example you would get +6, any of the +4 examples would get you +2 (as they can't overlap).
You're right, but lets see what everyone else has to say about it.
KEYOGIhulmey wrote:
dont waste your time on this one mate...To be blunt i wouldnt play it if you paid me
That's ok, you don't have to play it.
There seems to be enough support for it to continue.
hulmey wrote:DiM !!!!! Hate is a strong word, dont you think? It just seems a very confusing map and maybe keyogi's talents are served better in a more visual and not so confusing map....Because he is a good map maker.
I like different Maps like king of the hills etc... But i fear after playin this map twice its appeal will be lost. Just my opinon and alot more people in this thread seem to agree with that opinon judging by the feedback left!!
Wisse wrote:yeti_c wrote:
if it was 59,4 than we did not have 60% and 39,5 rounds up...
Sorry - I meant 60.4 and 39.5!!
C.
max is gr8 wrote:I still love crossword even though people hated it I think it's ready for quenching you cant change much the html will take quite a long time but oh well
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users